What percent of families in the US would you say are cult families? That's a hard question to answer, certainly small I would be surprised if it was more than 1% but it's not like I can extrapolate the numbers.... even cult operations are only partly headed by the cult - and cult families are only partly stocked with the cult. They operate in secret so even a cult family is usually only going to be half cult if even that - often just the wife who marries in to take over the family - one/two of her kids the other of which gets sacrificed - and then they own another family bloodline and all the money accrued over generations.... do that a whole bunch of times and you take over the world.

What is the hierarchy of cult families? To me it seems like the top would be the +, ++, and +++. - yep it's all on the QMAP tho the QMAP mentions the 4th which many including me think is Rockefeller but for the Saud/Soros/Roth it's pretty clear how they control the world... basically from the QMAP- Dec 7 2017 22:05:16 (EST) Rothschilds (cult leaders)(church)(P) Banks / Financial Institutions WW Gov Control Gov Controls People SA =Oil Tech Sex/Children -SA Controls (assigned) US / UK Politicians / Tech Co's (primary) Soros Controls organizations of people (create division / brainwash) + management / operator of slush funds (personal net worth never reduces think DOJ settlements Consumer Iran Enviro pacts etc etc) /_\ - Rock (past)(auth over followers) _\ (present)

Then you have the elite politicians, hollywood people, business people, and other various million/billionaires. Then it seems like you have the big group of everyone else like where your family would belong (let me know if my thinking is not correct). I guess what I'm trying to get at is I see the "benefit" of the cult for the top, top people, but why would what seems like the vast majority of the cult families remain cult families? Are they provided lots of money and power themselves?

a- you are mostly correct based on my understanding - as for why they remain? Well it gives them a legup on everyone else - they get secret knowledge and learn the true history, they get a get out of jail free card forever so long as they don't break the cult rules (don't talk about the cult just use symbolism) - they can "climb the vine" and get to the tippy top of any organization they choose and all it takes is the small price (to them) of their soul - sacrifice a kid and have an easier, possibly luxurious life. Not necessarily certain about it being luxirious but unlike the sheep (to their eyes) they actually have a real chance in the world and they know it. They abide by different rules and learn different non tainted things and well as the film by John Carpenter says "They Live, We Sleep" - basically that... so it's no wonder they would stay in I think. They can take pictures of their kids with the gold code as I've talked about and win contests (most contests are rigged and they put cultists that run them so when cultists enter they always win while we always lose) - and well anything really - the money is potential money and the power is potential power - it's up to the individual cultists to use the cult to climb up in the world - but unlike the rest of us they can get the stellar MSM coverage, they can win the awards, they can do whatever the heck they want - we don't stop them and they only prop up themselves while they beat everyone else down.

Are they too scared to leave the cult so once they are in they are stuck?
That's another thing yea, if a cultist mother sacrifices a child they are pretty much stuck since they know without the cult they'd go to jail - and also any child rapists also would be on film so they are stuck as well...

Are there any poor families that are cult? - Yes, two situations I'm aware of for this - firstly in the case of the filmed victims where they want to mess with someone in poverty so it requires a cultist to live in poverty with them - but of course they leave for much of the day as a respite from it. - Also they have homeless people addicted - not truly members of the cult more like victims of it - but they abide by the cult still. So it's a yes and a no on that one... I actually decoded the week when our side rounded them up but can no longer link to it.

Could you post somewhere your twitter feed from Sept 28 to when it was suspended? - No... it turns out it's a bit more complicated than just "the bad guys suspended it". I'm not 100% sure on this but it appears that the bad guys were trying to screw something up legally by using another victim of the cult in my family to try and bring things to court for the things I was saying about my family on twitter.. true things but by putting 5 cultist family members and 1 cult victim family member who would work as the face of it, it makes it harder for the good guys to hit the bad guys when they use a hostage like that... well I don't want to talk about it and so I won't, but while my case will go to court we don't want it to be a victim versus a victim case. So until that all gets resolved I'm not going to be talking about my family.