I'm not calling you a liar, but I'm an extreme skeptic of everything in general. I'd like to follow what you have to say, but what can you offer me as proof?
Please continue posting and making videos. Consider making backups other than on YT, and consider regularly backing up files to a "deadman" switch (can simply be a trusted individual, can be encrypted a la WL insurance) in case you get suicided, arrested for something bogus, or otherwise hushed. Seriously. The more real and serious the allegations, the more you should set up defenses.
pay close attention to the video's first few minutes with the timeline - note the corroboration between my posts, the media articles, Q proxy posts, and QMAP, particularly the timeframes where I post, wording and Q posts... I put some in larger form at the top of this https://acchat40.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=164&t=132667 - I give tons of interactions I've had including a POTUS tweet that gave me a nod with context included. I don' t need deadman switches or anything like that, I'm being protected 24/7 and have been for over a year now. They can't directly interact with anyone including me but they needed to let me know a few things like the fact that I was a cult victim. None of the victims of what I'm a victim of (filmed experimentation, torture, and also one stop playgrounds for traveling sleep rape blackmail ops) anyway none of the victims of that are aware as it kind of defeats the purpose of having a test tube subject if they are aware they are in a test tube.
I appreciate the skepticism, I wish people would be more skeptical of everything actually, I can answer any and all questions and have done so, I've just been silenced many times now. I got shouted down for the first week of both twitters I started (first one got deleted by my family which had been flipped but then got un-flipped through threats) They didn't kill me but after that I was moved to a secret location and both before and now I'm protected at all times. It's astounding just how much protection i have actually, all by people who can't talk to me about it. I'll be moved from here soon as the court case is soon, it's going all the way to the supreme court apparently and that's why the only two people in the QMAP that got a welcome aboard are me and Brett K - because it's my case (and people like me) who are at the heart of a massive upcoming case that'll drag out a lot of horrifying secrets about powerful people.
1121272
Alison Mack singing like a canary, as Alan Dershowitz would say
1121283
Canary palm tree?
Signal?
Q
why when someone asked Q about what it meant we get this?
Q can you double confirm the #17 was regarding the jerseys, when i asked yesterday for confirmation.
Anons are bringing up every other 17 under the sun, KEK
1008670
Alan.
Welcome aboard.
Plane.
17.
Q
Alan period - it was never Dershowitz, it was me,but if my proofs aren't good enough (and you can see them both in the acc link as well as the video if you look close at the timeline (this was days before it was deleted so giving that proof might have been what got it deleted - I mean you can see my interactions - go back in the 8chan archive see it at the literal moment I was talking to a Q proxy and then he references the conversation on the QMAP. anyway, doesn't' really matter I suppose if you believe it, my tapes will be made public soon and that'll be the ultimate confirmation.
Q often uses abbreviations and shortened names. Ridiculous to say it’s some random person when q often links to twitter accounts— but never once on yours. Never talks about random people— but we are supposed to believe you are that special?! Wow. Your ego is ridiculous.
"soon" because they don't give me timetables - and to guess would just be setting myself up for failure. Not so much a pattern as it is a consistency I have of only answering questions that I know the answer to.
So are you saying that when nothing comes to pass- you are just going to keep saying “soon”? So November, December, January... just keep waiting? I hope whoever you live with doesn’t mind supporting you forever.
Thanks for the reply. You speak and write well for someone who gets lost in 20 feet and can't tie shoes. That isn't meant as an insult. Take it as a compliment if you like. It's interesting and TBH perpetuates my skepticism. I have a couple of questions.
What exactly was the FOIA for and when will you release it?
Will your SCOTUS case be accessible in records as it's ongoing, after it's decided, long afterward, or never? It seems if Q and all of this is legit, it should come out before too long.
Your phone call... the bluff... was that related to the location you were formerly living at or safehouse? We can set up PGP or something if you like.
thank you for the kind words, I am very uneven tho, and while I think I've got a handle on most of my psychological issues it's been a long battle, luckily my disability makes me very hard to break as my mind resets, I don't think many people could handle as well as I can psychological manipulation - with me my brain just constantly dumps all negative and positive emotions - it's why I get lost so easy and it's also why I'm much harder to traumatize (I think) than others - it's why I can sound pretty normal despite the past I have - 9/10 times I don't carry the weight of my trauma as it's flushed from the mind at every reset my brain has. A curse and a strange blessing that only is a blessing due to me being the kind of victim I am.... a very strange thing to talk about yet that's the secret to why I can talk well and don't sound as crazy as I might otherwise would if I carried my scars like a normal person. that's not to say I don't have problems, oh boy do I.... I think they viewed me as a heck of a challenge and ratcheted it up for much of my life - so well... a lot to say about that and you'll see the tapes like everyone else will and it'll be quite a story.
the foia was for my sister's filings - she worked under Obama in Washington D.C. two years ago for the E.P.A. - she filed illegal tapes from the E.P.A. and they were picked up through the D.O.E. which I believe is where many illegal recordings were piled together since you can't FOIA it. But since these tapes are of me and were sent through the E.P.A. that means they should be available through just the request I made.
basically the tapes were of the filmed experimentation - the code "Stay Tuned" references the 1992 film of the same name https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Bs2icpiR1s which is something they showed me on a cult night as a way to laugh about the upcoming trials and tribulations they would set up while laughing about it all on camera - of course that's the entertainment aspect of killing a child on film - and there's a lot to say about that - it was also experimentation in making school shooters and market research and who knows what else, I've only recently understood it
as for the SCOTUS thing... I have no freaking idea about that part, I only became aware of the Brett K connection due to him being welcomed aboard like I was - and the welcome aboard being also used for a pic of the inside of AF1 - I knew there would be a court case but up until this week I didn't realize it was so tied to the highest court. - I think my case will prevent the need to DECLAS material that would hurt good people - basically DECLAS would by itself mean a lot of good people would be thrown under the bus due to the bad guys media control and ability to spin - but my case allows for selective people, the ones that fucked me over all my life to be brought out in the open and that ties it to other victims - and all the people who rape us in our sleep and experiment - tying it to the worst of the worst - basically it's a very special DECLAS that will only involve the worst players allowing the bad guys to crumble before we go full DECLAS and when we do the bad guys will be so weakened by my case going public that it won't be the threat it otherwise would have. that's my theory anyway : )
as for the bluff that was as my mother had unflipped - truthfully she may never have unflipped as I have asserted, she just scared the crap out of me with what she did and said - i know she was threatened due to the messages the good guys sent and yet she still delivered me to the facility with the other victims rather than the bad guys so the bluff might have been something they were having her do as the bad guys still had the cameras set up in the Alan house which is where I was staying at the time. that part is confusing to me... whether she was acting for the bad guys who were watching and therefore it was a bluff for them or whether she was not acting and it was a bluff against me... I guess it could be both but I need to ask the good guys directly about it when I can.
Anyway to be specific, the bluff code was given to me as I was being driven to the facility which I refused to stay at (at first) and then they drove me to the hotel which is where they further clarified that my family was being threatened on 8ch (the pic post of text so as to avoid sniffers sent to me) - and then a cop came by and took me back to the facility which I accepted and then met the 20 other victims of the filming where I was tasked to basically let them know they were victims which i did.
view the rest of the comments →
14301990? ago
I'm not calling you a liar, but I'm an extreme skeptic of everything in general. I'd like to follow what you have to say, but what can you offer me as proof?
Please continue posting and making videos. Consider making backups other than on YT, and consider regularly backing up files to a "deadman" switch (can simply be a trusted individual, can be encrypted a la WL insurance) in case you get suicided, arrested for something bogus, or otherwise hushed. Seriously. The more real and serious the allegations, the more you should set up defenses.
14302196? ago
pay close attention to the video's first few minutes with the timeline - note the corroboration between my posts, the media articles, Q proxy posts, and QMAP, particularly the timeframes where I post, wording and Q posts... I put some in larger form at the top of this https://acchat40.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=164&t=132667 - I give tons of interactions I've had including a POTUS tweet that gave me a nod with context included. I don' t need deadman switches or anything like that, I'm being protected 24/7 and have been for over a year now. They can't directly interact with anyone including me but they needed to let me know a few things like the fact that I was a cult victim. None of the victims of what I'm a victim of (filmed experimentation, torture, and also one stop playgrounds for traveling sleep rape blackmail ops) anyway none of the victims of that are aware as it kind of defeats the purpose of having a test tube subject if they are aware they are in a test tube.
I appreciate the skepticism, I wish people would be more skeptical of everything actually, I can answer any and all questions and have done so, I've just been silenced many times now. I got shouted down for the first week of both twitters I started (first one got deleted by my family which had been flipped but then got un-flipped through threats) They didn't kill me but after that I was moved to a secret location and both before and now I'm protected at all times. It's astounding just how much protection i have actually, all by people who can't talk to me about it. I'll be moved from here soon as the court case is soon, it's going all the way to the supreme court apparently and that's why the only two people in the QMAP that got a welcome aboard are me and Brett K - because it's my case (and people like me) who are at the heart of a massive upcoming case that'll drag out a lot of horrifying secrets about powerful people.
14306999? ago
ALAN is Alan Dershowitz. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ai0mIjosxqI
14309033? ago
where in the QMAP did it say the word Dershowitz? ah that's right in reply to someone
Apr 20 2018 19:36:21 (EST) Anonymous ID: 29a790 No.1121283 📁 Apr 20 2018 19:31:44 (EST)
why when someone asked Q about what it meant we get this?
Q can you double confirm the #17 was regarding the jerseys, when i asked yesterday for confirmation.
Anons are bringing up every other 17 under the sun, KEK
Alan period - it was never Dershowitz, it was me,but if my proofs aren't good enough (and you can see them both in the acc link as well as the video if you look close at the timeline (this was days before it was deleted so giving that proof might have been what got it deleted - I mean you can see my interactions - go back in the 8chan archive see it at the literal moment I was talking to a Q proxy and then he references the conversation on the QMAP. anyway, doesn't' really matter I suppose if you believe it, my tapes will be made public soon and that'll be the ultimate confirmation.
14310120? ago
Check the Lolita express log... not hard to see this is Alan Dershowitz
14313219? ago
if it was Dershowitz, Q would have said Dershowitz - there's a billion Alan's out there and he said ALAN PERIOD - nothing after the Alan -
14313781? ago
Q often uses abbreviations and shortened names. Ridiculous to say it’s some random person when q often links to twitter accounts— but never once on yours. Never talks about random people— but we are supposed to believe you are that special?! Wow. Your ego is ridiculous.
14309930? ago
and here’s another “soon”. Quite the pattern you’ve got going.
14313079? ago
"soon" because they don't give me timetables - and to guess would just be setting myself up for failure. Not so much a pattern as it is a consistency I have of only answering questions that I know the answer to.
14313683? ago
So are you saying that when nothing comes to pass- you are just going to keep saying “soon”? So November, December, January... just keep waiting? I hope whoever you live with doesn’t mind supporting you forever.
14313727? ago
meh, i already said I'm not going to talk about my living arrangements, that's off limits for safety reasons.
14357665? ago
Tell suzanna and james hi!!
14303566? ago
So glad you are being protected! Continue to speak your truth, no matter what!
14302439? ago
Thanks for the reply. You speak and write well for someone who gets lost in 20 feet and can't tie shoes. That isn't meant as an insult. Take it as a compliment if you like. It's interesting and TBH perpetuates my skepticism. I have a couple of questions.
What exactly was the FOIA for and when will you release it?
Will your SCOTUS case be accessible in records as it's ongoing, after it's decided, long afterward, or never? It seems if Q and all of this is legit, it should come out before too long.
Your phone call... the bluff... was that related to the location you were formerly living at or safehouse? We can set up PGP or something if you like.
14302695? ago
thank you for the kind words, I am very uneven tho, and while I think I've got a handle on most of my psychological issues it's been a long battle, luckily my disability makes me very hard to break as my mind resets, I don't think many people could handle as well as I can psychological manipulation - with me my brain just constantly dumps all negative and positive emotions - it's why I get lost so easy and it's also why I'm much harder to traumatize (I think) than others - it's why I can sound pretty normal despite the past I have - 9/10 times I don't carry the weight of my trauma as it's flushed from the mind at every reset my brain has. A curse and a strange blessing that only is a blessing due to me being the kind of victim I am.... a very strange thing to talk about yet that's the secret to why I can talk well and don't sound as crazy as I might otherwise would if I carried my scars like a normal person. that's not to say I don't have problems, oh boy do I.... I think they viewed me as a heck of a challenge and ratcheted it up for much of my life - so well... a lot to say about that and you'll see the tapes like everyone else will and it'll be quite a story.
the foia was for my sister's filings - she worked under Obama in Washington D.C. two years ago for the E.P.A. - she filed illegal tapes from the E.P.A. and they were picked up through the D.O.E. which I believe is where many illegal recordings were piled together since you can't FOIA it. But since these tapes are of me and were sent through the E.P.A. that means they should be available through just the request I made.
basically the tapes were of the filmed experimentation - the code "Stay Tuned" references the 1992 film of the same name https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Bs2icpiR1s which is something they showed me on a cult night as a way to laugh about the upcoming trials and tribulations they would set up while laughing about it all on camera - of course that's the entertainment aspect of killing a child on film - and there's a lot to say about that - it was also experimentation in making school shooters and market research and who knows what else, I've only recently understood it
as for the SCOTUS thing... I have no freaking idea about that part, I only became aware of the Brett K connection due to him being welcomed aboard like I was - and the welcome aboard being also used for a pic of the inside of AF1 - I knew there would be a court case but up until this week I didn't realize it was so tied to the highest court. - I think my case will prevent the need to DECLAS material that would hurt good people - basically DECLAS would by itself mean a lot of good people would be thrown under the bus due to the bad guys media control and ability to spin - but my case allows for selective people, the ones that fucked me over all my life to be brought out in the open and that ties it to other victims - and all the people who rape us in our sleep and experiment - tying it to the worst of the worst - basically it's a very special DECLAS that will only involve the worst players allowing the bad guys to crumble before we go full DECLAS and when we do the bad guys will be so weakened by my case going public that it won't be the threat it otherwise would have. that's my theory anyway : )
as for the bluff that was as my mother had unflipped - truthfully she may never have unflipped as I have asserted, she just scared the crap out of me with what she did and said - i know she was threatened due to the messages the good guys sent and yet she still delivered me to the facility with the other victims rather than the bad guys so the bluff might have been something they were having her do as the bad guys still had the cameras set up in the Alan house which is where I was staying at the time. that part is confusing to me... whether she was acting for the bad guys who were watching and therefore it was a bluff for them or whether she was not acting and it was a bluff against me... I guess it could be both but I need to ask the good guys directly about it when I can.
Anyway to be specific, the bluff code was given to me as I was being driven to the facility which I refused to stay at (at first) and then they drove me to the hotel which is where they further clarified that my family was being threatened on 8ch (the pic post of text so as to avoid sniffers sent to me) - and then a cop came by and took me back to the facility which I accepted and then met the 20 other victims of the filming where I was tasked to basically let them know they were victims which i did.