I can be bothered! Qurious indeed.

Voat looks like an Israeli Disco.

yea the numbers are figurative.

you wanna substitute your own numbers? Go for it. So long as the post Q number is millions higher than the pre Q number, knock yourself out, i wont be a stickler for accuracy

you still havent accounted for the very pertinent issue of why the CIA would run a program that wakes millions of people up to the critical necessity of destroying the Deep State

RECONCILE THAT before descending into ad hominems

Nixon: The, uh—Now, uh, we could—Have you considered any other poss—, have you considered the other, all other possibilities you see here, John? You, you’re the one who is supposed to—

DEAN: That’s right. I think we,

PRESIDENT: You know the bodies.

DEAN: I think we’ve had a good go-round on— >PRESIDENT: You think, you think we want to, want to go this route now? And the—let it hang out, so to speak?

DEAN: Well, it’s, it isn’t really that— >HALDEMAN: It’s a limited hang out.

DEAN: It’s a limited hang out.

EHRLICHMAN: It’s a modified limited hang out.

PRESIDENT: Well, it’s only the questions of the thing hanging out publicly or privately.

DEAN: What it’s doing, Mr. President, is getting you up above and away from it. And that’s the most important thing.

PRESIDENT: Oh, I know. But I suggested that the other day and we all came down on, uh, remember we came down on, uh, on the negative on it. Now what’s changed our mind? >DEAN: The lack of alternatives, or a body. (Laughter)

EHRLICHMAN: We, we went down every alley. (Laughter) Let it go over.

Richard Nixon, John Dean, John Ehrlichman, John Mitchell and H.R. Haldeman (transcript from an audio-recorded meeting at the White House, Washington, D.C. March 22, 1973)

@molochhunter @kobold

ahh yes, The faggot who banned me, then quit as a Moderator because people complained.

If you haven't already, I believe it would be helpful for voat users if you update info on your reposts on PG regarding Mr. Walsh aka "Sir John" as you did on reddit.

kobold [S] 1 point (+1|-0) 1.3 years ago (edited 1.3 years ago)

the so called chief justice is also alarming "order st john of jerusalem" https://cdn.legalcheek.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/sir-john.pngPNG

https://www.legalcheek.com/2014/10/sir-john-walsh-of-branaghs-cv-may-be-even-more-spectacular-than-lord-harley-of-counsels/

Useful update info exposing his fraud a year ago (which you did post on reddit account a day ago):

https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/itnj-chief-justice-stripped-of-ability-to-practise-law/

Link to reddit post updating the info regarding Mr. Walsh a year ago:

https://www.reddit.com/r/auslaw/comments/85yzs4/its_finally_here_the_full_saga_of_the_removal_of/

I appreciate you backtracking enough from: "so, i think it is time for voat to do something about q and i mean to kick them out asap hopefully. all the associated subs. i might post this same info to v/protectvoat in some shape or form..." to your conceding that banning Q related subs is "also bad form".

(*How exactly were you planning to kick them out? Besides sperging out about Q subs on PG and Protect Voat?)

There is more backstory to the fraud of itnj according to Rebecca Cope (fmr? itnj director/trustee). (see the posted letters) She describes what appears to be a group of activists collecting money but without the transparency they promise, instead what they are offering doesn't exist as they claim, instead it's an internet scam, preying on the ideals of people, just as socialist progressives, btw, prey on well meaning but uninformed voters, offering false narratives within FAKE NEWS organizations to help hide their fraud and keep the donations flowing to help build more bridges to nowhere. https://claimsoftheliving.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-itnj-rears-its-ugly-head-law-of-new.html

June 29, 2017

THE ITNJ REARS ITS UGLY HEAD: THE LAW OF THE NEW AGE ORDER PART VII

The most important thing to know about this court is it has little to do with the people. It's all about The Titles sending an illusion to the public to lead them to believe they're working to solve the problems of humanity. This in turn creates the illusion that all of their related projects are designed to help humanity. To summarize;

We've established the ITNJ is a product of Humanitad and New Earth Trust, and that Humanitad and New Earth Trust support many of the concepts of the United Nations, particularly the environment and even their financial system.

We've established that New Earth Trust facilitates projects within New Earth Nation that seek to govern the use of land, education, media, finance, and law, wrapped in fancy graphics and new age language.

hmmm, nothing communist aka Cynthia McKinney-esque about THAT. /s So who would jump to a conclusion and suddenly claim that qanon is either honestly endorsed by these grifter communist globalists or part of them? You I guess.

con't

We've established the same principals of the Trust are the same principals within each of these sub-organizations.

As for the ITNJ:

We've established the ITNJ Committee, which will include its international chapters, knows little to nothing about law. The principals in the international chapters DO know about law, which is primarily why there are few, if any, international chapters. The body count is currently at four (that we know of).

We've established the ITNJ Treaty is an adhesion contract tied directly to its ever-changing Constitution; and

We've established that a small group of people in front of the New Earth Trust run this entire show, while it is unknown who is or may be behind the Trust.

To illustrate the inconsistencies which create conflict with the ITNJ's mission as it advertises to the public at large versus law, policy and procedure that continue to put the authority and control in the hands of a few (where have we heard that before?) and the flexibility of those policies to which the people have no right to object to, we have to show how this court purports itself to be a solution for human rights violations "of global significance" but has no means or authority to implement its findings...

...We wanted to make absolutely sure that "we the people" were involved in this court and the power and authority was known to come from the people, not the judge, not The Titles, not The Others, not The Big Names, and we wanted to make absolutely sure that this theme was consistent in word and in deed throughout...

[However...]

The Titles didn't respect their own procedures enough to hold themselves accountable to them. What other stuff would they put in writing and ignore?

And this is why this court will never go anywhere save for a place in its own little world, with The Others and the Big Names coming and going, feeding off of the hard work of good-hearted and dedicated volunteers raising money and arranging calendars, meetings, conference calls, rushing to meet endless Deadlines for no payment or reward save the trust and the hope they have in The Titles, that they're changing the world for the better, while The Titles keep changing the rules only to hold a Big Meeting amongst Themselves to oust anyone who objects. No matter what Title They give you, there's still that little group who claims authority over all.

Within the link see The itnj media campaign graphic:

Below is a mind map, the result of a week's worth of putting the pieces of the entire project's current and projected infrastructure and goals into perspective, authored by the USA law team, using the Logical Framework Method in a course kindly provided to us by one of its teachers, Noel. We needed to know how to promote a court through education and media without the court's involvement as in promoting itself -- how to provide a space for education in common law, grand juries, etc. so that anyone wishing to participate in the court would have access to as much knowledge and information as possible. It was a massive project and a lot of work, and the final diagram came out in mid-July 2015.

BTW the diagram also resembles something you might see put out by a publicity company to spread a campaign.

We did not want anyone to have to pay for access to this court, so we built in a few options that might help make the court self-funded, along with a transparent system of education and media outreach that we thought might bring in educated and devoted people along with the donations from people and groups who would show their support that way. Our goal was that no one would have to pay to have access to justice if we could avoid it. We'd even left the option open to find ways to set aside a pool of funds for people less financially fortunate in order to pay the filing fee if we had to charge one, should it come down to it.

We presented the plan to Sacha Stone with excitement and enthusiasm.

It was flatly rejected for more reasons than I can put down here, the most notable of which it wasn't "international" enough. We all must consult with Sir John immediately. We'd left the rest of the world out. The USA was responsible for all the problems on the planet and we were tasked to fix them -- and here we were, thinking only of ourselves.

Not seeing any MAGA sentiment in that paragraph recalling the Sacha Stone response to Rebecca Core's concerns!

And we flatly rejected his rejection.

We'd based this model roughly on the first ITNJ Legislative Statute document drafted by The Titles Themselves, in late 2014:

You can compare this model to the public ITNJ documents today and see that they're actually two separate documents.

We stood our ground, and the whole show ended something like this:

The Titles always assumed they ran the show, and The Titles decided the ITNJ Director and a Trustee Emeritus and a Founding Member wasn't up to snuff. So they had this Big Meeting amongst Themselves. We think we scared the pants off The Titles by going off The Script, which promptly set the stage for Big Drama. If not good at anything else, they are all good with Big Drama.

So... if intj is purely a CIA psyop as you're inclined to believe, I'm inclined to believe that it's not one of their better ones.

And I want to add, that you have statements in general about how controlled opposition influences people which I agree with (NOT regarding your claims tying intj to Qanon because someone on reddit pedogate used a hashtag on a pro intj meme), but it's up to the researchers to contest those influences, such as vocal voices (and I've been one of them) on GA regarding controlled OP AJ and Corsi, CIA UFO ops, etc etc etc. PG shares the same early internet names in influencing their early cohesion (Pieczenik, Ronald Bernard, David Seaman for example) yet you haven't presumed to "kick PG out ASAP". Perhaps ideally you should appreciate some of the research that has been produced by Q supporters instead of painting the movement with the broad brush of your own political bias. Assuming that at the end of the day you have honest intent regarding the process of legitimate research and debate over it.

@Vindicator @gamepwn @Molochhunter