I have returned as moderator/owner (ProtectVoat)

submitted ago by sguevar

It is clear that u/Crensch will still try to attack this sub that even as a simple user he thinks he can attack me as he did on this post: https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3311363

It is clear that his motivations and his supporters are misguided.

I have accepted to return again because his arrogance doesn't let him see how much he has lost:

  • Credibility
  • His principles
  • His cause

So thanks for the invite again u/kevdude.

I stand with v/ProtectVoat all the way and hence I stand by Voat all the way.

My dear typhoon, keep whistling away.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

BraunF14 ago

This is a good addition to a strong and positive sub. @crensch just went ahead and built a pseudonym subverse called v/Protectgoats trying to act like he's a true goat himself. Despicable. At least we'll have open discussions and freedom of speech here, unlike any sub that's controlled by QRV, GA, or their third spammy board theawakening.

Let's open Voat's eyes to the censorship happening in those subs and work towards running the anti-free speech, paranoid Q worshippers out of our site.

sguevar ago

Let's open Voat's eyes to the censorship happening in those subs

Agreed

work towards running the anti-free speech, paranoid Q worshippers out of our site.

Disagree :)

They have a right to be here and express their opinions. So I will defend their right to do it.

But u/Crensch is requesting me to give hard proof that he coordinated that doxx team when he knows I can't. I based my statement on probable cause/motive and his past interactions with those users and defense he made for one of them.

Is like I posted here: https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3269930

Does the user constantly denies the validity of your claims?

Despite all the evidence that you can bring to the table, they continue to contest the validity of your arguments. Usually they take information out of context to use conveniently in order to argue against the validity of certain aspect of your statements. They use this approach in a general way. For example: I personally don't trust (((Psychologists))) because their field is full of (((jews in the letter))) and as a Christian I don't trust the tools of the synagogue of Satan. This is my personal position on it. However some of their material can be interesting to read and yet somewhat relevant to a particular discussion. Nonetheless, a user engaging in trolling/shilling will probably use a more generic approach that doesn't express their position: Psychology is not a real science. Psychology is social engineering. The field of Psychology is full of jews. These statements all present a somewhat valid perspective and hence without stating their position right away they use generality to deny your position on a certain aspect.

They can also label your claims as rumors, start demanding proofs that would be impossible for you to acquire. As you can't proof your claims further then your position loses credibility. Additionally they can ask for you to propose a detail solution to the problem at hand. If you can't produce it then you don't know what you are talking about.

He is not that stupid to coordinate openly on Voat. There is also a just assumption that he has active communication with u/srayzie and u/shizy outside of Voat. And for that any coordination would have either happened outside of Voat or within PMs he has with the users banned that were posted on this post: https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3311363.

The only way anyone can get hard evidence of it is that we accessed his communications with those users. But I will not push for that. I will push for him to change my mind about. He won't, he will redirect and keep on attacking me in order to try to attack my credibility... the one he lost a while back.

BraunF14 ago

Lol I don't even think he's the same guy anymore tbh. I find it fair you disagree with part of my comment. It's just my opinion. With all the seriousness of the majority of Voat's posts and discussions, it's difficult to watch GA subs "flourish" while spatting baby babble and conspiracy theories. Every post is tinfoil hat worthy. So much conspiracy theories. They're all essentially spam posts at this point. Nothing the GA subs put out have any weight in content. That's important and sad due to the very heavy weight they all carry above and below their waistlines there.

sguevar ago

Well I see where you are coming from.

I never trusted the movement but I do find their motivations and reading about it interesting.I can understand why in from the vaccum of leadership there was in the US and the corruption of the luciferian elite where this is coming from also.

I prefer to put my faith in the Lord (whether you agree with it or not) the rest is just entertainment. But as I will defend their right to share their opinions uncensored, I will with yours. That is it. You have a right to openly say what you want about their movement and you have a right to share it with whomever you want. They don't have a right to suppress your speech as you don't have the right to suppress theirs.

The problem is that u/Crensch thinks that he can suppress the right of speech of anyone he doesn't like and that is openly against the movement he defends. If the subscribers of that sub want to blindly accept his actions then that I will leave it be. But I will always be critical of them (his actions).

BraunF14 ago

Yep. Got banned for Reason: "Other" awhile back. Sparked an outrage and now I guess ive become a SDBH guy idk. I'm not even sure what the soap subs do to be honest lol. But they're on my side? I used to be Christian. Still am in a way. My mom was a pastor for a long time and I'd lead teen groups in fellowship. It was fun and interesting. I hold beliefs I'll never give up because of it :)

That being said, one big gripe I have about the movement is their idol worship of trump, Q, and their subs moderation team. It's weird

sguevar ago

That being said, one big gripe I have about the movement is their idol worship of trump, Q, and their subs moderation team. It's weird

I hear you. As I see it and have expressed in the past. Trump is to me the last breath we have before all goes south. But he is a supporter of the satanic state of Israel hence he is a tool of the Synagogue.

So that is my take on the US president. I do support some of the things he has said and done but always remain skeptic because I put no blind faith in men nor the tools of men.

I must say however that my work colleagues like to mess with me because I have defended Trump against normal sjw false narratives. Quite a fun time I had during the elections XD.

BraunF14 ago

Oh dude I bet. Most people in the US are so polarized all they see is absolute support or complete hatred of the guy. They don't think there could be any in between. I'm all in with your exact thoughts about him