I have been thinking about that proposal and I am not so sure it would.

Making v/GreatAwakening a system sub may solve the inaction of it's user base to act and apply downvotes where it's due. Meaning that it's user base would be forced to be more proactive and to inform itself on how to deal with shills and trolls effectively. But the sub would still need to have a janitor/moderator that would need to curate the content. And given the size of that sub it would need several to do what the moderator team is supposed to do.

From all this experience this is my opinion on the following that might solve the voids and insatisfactions created by the current state of affairs:

• u/Crensch should not be the owner of the sub. He should step down and give that title to u/srayz
• u/srayz was a good moderator/owner and content curator. Despite her lack of judgement on her support for the group that was attacking her detractors that doesn't change the fact she was a good one. Even if many don't like her for her constant denunciations and emotional responses, her work cannot be undone. The v/GreatAwakening user base is grateful with her and quite appreciative.
• Some of the current set of rules should be modified to make clear, objective and effective rules. This includes creating an specific one for doxxing that goes along with the site's one but that it is more specific. i.e. If the owner of the information gives/removes permission of sharing it or if the owner of the information made the link him/herself, then those should be considered acceptable exceptions.
• Guilty by association rules should be removed.
• Unjustifiable bans should be reversed as @Puttitout has made precedent that it is possible. Mine for example was unjustified and several others should be removed.
• Comments should only be deleted if they are illegal or go against the site's global rules (which includes doxxing of Voat's user base)
• Despite of the fact that I find it to be a questionable character, u/Molochhunter has proved to be somewhat fair in his moderation. My questions regard on his defense for an unjust ban on u/trigglyppuff. But his activity as a moderator is consistent so he should also stay in the moderator team in v/GreatAwakening.
• u/shizie should also stay despite of the fact that she fell under the same bus that the previous users did. Her commitment with v/GreatAwakening is not in question to my eyes. Though she called me a cuck with her alt u/hollacost, I hold no grudge against her. She sould also stay in the moderator team.

- It is clear that one of the tasks of being a moderator, specially in the case of the v/GreatAwakening sub, is to continuously inform and educate their user base so the subscribers of their sub become more proactive and do not rely only on the moderators to act (downvote disingenuous users' posts and comments, upvote genuine users' posts and comments, block users that are annoying to their eyes, report suspicious behaviors - not through posts on their sub but archiving and then making an informative post on v/ProtectVoat about said users that they can link in their comments to others to inform them). After all I recognize the risk that carries being a moderator of such a polemic subverse. And the safety of the moderators can only be better insured if their user base helps them protect them.

In the end if our admin decides to make the sub a system sub, then they should remain janitors of the sub. But that decision also resides on the v/GreatAwakening user base. The admin team should consider their say on the matter.

But that is my opinion and I am sure many will disagree.