I'm glad you linked to a thread where you get BTFO for your ceaseless kikery so no one else has to put in the effort of providing the link, CP solicitor.
Solicitation is the act of persuading or soliciting another individual or entity to perform or participate in an activity that is typically criminal, illegal, and unlawful in nature. The classification of Soliciting behavior can be a difficult task due to the fact that prosecutors in litigation of a case involving Solicitation must prove the criminal intent displayed by the individual charged. As a result, there oftentimes exists an ambiguity to selling or peddling and Soliciting. However, intent is far more noticeable within events such as scams, schemes, and manipulations involving the unlawful persuasion of participation.
Motte and bailey motherfucker, do you speak it? You are attempting to paint /u/theoldones as a pedo, and when you get called out on it you shift the goalposts. He is probably not a pedo. You are probably not a pedo either. Behave like a goddamed adult and have reasonable rational discussions with no spurious and ridiculous accusations.
I understand that you're angry. Rise above that anger and use the magic of logic.
Trying to bait you into entrapping yourself is not the same as actually desiring CP
Where did I claim this? I posted those links where he tried getting me to engage in a criminal act. My claims were about him soliciting CP, not being a pedo itself. If you want to argue intent to refute solicitation, then go ahead.
If I thought he was a pedo, I would straight up call him that. You shifted the goalposts from asking me to show his solicitation to saying it can't be that because he didn't desire it. Even you inadvertently agreed on his intent (scheme), by recognizing the entrapment.
Yes. It's what I'm going with. I've spent days spamming direct links to him begging for child porn. So either you're a fucking moron, blind, Or a liar. We both know he begged for child porn. You admit it yourself and make excuses for it when you try to shove in whether or not the beggar actually wanted to own CP personally, as if anyone but you and the faggot was talking about this at all.
view the rest of the comments →
Decidueye ago
I'm glad you linked to a thread where you get BTFO for your ceaseless kikery so no one else has to put in the effort of providing the link, CP solicitor.
Fambida ago
There's plenty to hate about him without making huge exaggerations. He didn't solicit CP and you fucking know it.
And please feel free to link the post that you think constitutes asking for CP, because it only shows just how disingenuous you are.
Just be honest. He's wrong and you're right. You don't need to tell lies to win here. Argue in good faith and be an adult.
Decidueye ago
Here's one, here's another. No matter what reasons or excuses might be said, he tried getting me to post pics of naked kids.
Fambida ago
Trying to bait you into entrapping yourself is not the same as actually desiring CP and you know it.
Decidueye ago
https://criminal.laws.com/solicitation
OP has stated his intent for doing so in this thread and in comments in the sole nested chain on one of the links I provided.
theoldones ago
MY REBUTTAL. FUCKING READ IT
fuck you
Fambida ago
Motte and bailey motherfucker, do you speak it? You are attempting to paint /u/theoldones as a pedo, and when you get called out on it you shift the goalposts. He is probably not a pedo. You are probably not a pedo either. Behave like a goddamed adult and have reasonable rational discussions with no spurious and ridiculous accusations.
I understand that you're angry. Rise above that anger and use the magic of logic.
Decidueye ago
Where did I claim this? I posted those links where he tried getting me to engage in a criminal act. My claims were about him soliciting CP, not being a pedo itself. If you want to argue intent to refute solicitation, then go ahead.
Fambida ago
OK, you lying rules lawyering faggot. You didn't REALLY do it, you just did everything that constitutes it instead...
You can be a better person than this.
Decidueye ago
If I thought he was a pedo, I would straight up call him that. You shifted the goalposts from asking me to show his solicitation to saying it can't be that because he didn't desire it. Even you inadvertently agreed on his intent (scheme), by recognizing the entrapment.
theoldones ago
what a difference from your accusations.
Decidueye ago
Demonstrating you're a CP solicitor doesn't prove that you're a pedo. You admitted your intent was a sting, which falls under scheme for solicitation.
Dortex ago
Well now. Where is anyone calling him. a pedo?
Fambida ago
Really? That's what you're going with? I'm pretty sure i pointed out the whole disingenuous thing already.
Argue in good faith. You're on the right side. You don't need tricks to win.
Dortex ago
Yes. It's what I'm going with. I've spent days spamming direct links to him begging for child porn. So either you're a fucking moron, blind, Or a liar. We both know he begged for child porn. You admit it yourself and make excuses for it when you try to shove in whether or not the beggar actually wanted to own CP personally, as if anyone but you and the faggot was talking about this at all.
So tell me: Where did anyone call him a pedo?
theoldones ago
you had my rebuttal and you white-lied.
every time you spammed it, i had to be the one to fucking point out my side, you piece of dishonest shit
theoldones ago
go read my rebuttal, and shut the fuck up.
Decidueye ago
You're the one continuing to lose your god damn marbles with each post.
theoldones ago
you motherfuckers are literally accusing me of being a "CP solicitor" when i have a goddamn rebuttal written opposing that read.
if that spic-fuck hadnt white-lied we wouldn't be here, doing this.