Hahahahaha! You are the case study for why Narcissistic Personality Disorder should be considered a form of mental retardation. You're being completely dishonest, you're omitting actual proof of why he's doing this, you're mislabeling his accusations on purpose, and you're going straight to DARVO. When you ask and tell a user to post child pornography, people are going accuse you of soliciting child pornography. Just like when someone posts pictures of kids in a jailbait sub, they'll be accused of being a pedo.

It's funny that you purposely leave me out since I'm the user you solicited on more than one occasion. No one should trust your name, as you've earned your reputation as it is. IDGAF if people click on your deceptive rebuttal, because I already refuted your devious bullshit there, but I'll let it be known here too.

Liar. That cuntflicker @Aged never posted actual pictures of naked kids, otherwise he'd have been nuked from the site a long time ago. But you told me to post CP in more than one instance. You can't hide that shit, take it back, or your (((pilpul))) tactics regarding definitions.

Defamation only works when the statements are lies (they aren't). Claiming he's the one initiating the idea of suing is also an outright lie (check times on comments on this link versus the link OP provided). You've been directly accused of soliciting CP the entire time since you wanted me to post such appalling and illegal content, not as being a pedophile. So pretending your link in /v/whatever is what you've being accused of the entire time is absolute bullshit. Your defense is also bullshit, because it hinges on intentional misinterpretations of definitions (((pilpul))), and false equivalencies.

@Puttitout, would soliciting child pornography from another user be considered as a violation of rule 2 since it breaks federal law? He's also in the middle of the process of doxxing @Dortex, so is this a violation of the doxxing rule? I would like to hear your clarification on both.