u/Laurentius_the_pyro throwing a hissy fit and attempting to incite revenege petitions, after their favourite pedophile pornographer was banned for spam.

u/Laurentius_the_pyro throwing a hissy fit and attempting to incite revenege petitions, after their favourite pedophile pornographer was banned for spam. (voat.co)

submitted 5.7 years ago by theoldones

12 comments

Thrus2 5.7 years ago

You seem to like posting things to protect voat when someone disagrees with your stance. This isn't the first time you have done that.

link

theoldones 5.7 years ago

dammit, now how will i fantisize about cumming inside a 12 year old?

@Laurentius_the_pyro (probably)

link

Laurentius_the_pyro 5.7 years ago

Keep telling yourself that everyone who cares about free speech is a pedophile you SJW.

You cannot ban someone for not breaking the rules of a subverse, the argument for banning /u/aged "spam" applies to your own spam as well, therefore any argument for banning aged would also result in banning you if enforcement was even.

link

theoldones 5.7 years ago

i say he's a pedo because he got caught posting photos of actual children.

what now, pedo enabler? you want the source link to show who you're defending right now?

link

Laurentius_the_pyro 5.7 years ago

i say he's a pedo because he got caught posting photos of actual children.

What rule did be break in /v/gaming?

what now, pedo enabler? you want the source link to show who you're defending right now?

If you don't defend freedom of speech even for people you hate, then you don't care about freedom of speech.

link

theoldones 5.7 years ago

pedos get the rope.

in v/gaming he spammed posts.

pick a better person to make a martyr out of. currently you're holding up the person who posted this: https://voat.co/v/nonnude/2012506

link

Laurentius_the_pyro 5.7 years ago

pedos get the rope.

I agree.

in v/gaming he spammed posts.

this is false under the currently posted rules, unless you consider your own posts to also be spam.

pick a better person to make a martyr out of. currently you're holding up the person who posted this:

If you don't defend free speech even for people you'd rather see dead, then you don't care about free speech.

link

theoldones 5.7 years ago

pedos get the rope.

I agree.

bullshit. you're currently arguing for one to be unbanned, so he can continue to spam shit until he can finally post real CP and get the website shut down

link

Laurentius_the_pyro 5.7 years ago

bullshit. you're currently arguing for one to be unbanned, so he can continue to spam shit until he can finally post real CP and get the website shut down

please explain?

How exactly are these posts allowing aged to eventually post actual CP?

link

Thrus2 5.7 years ago

doesn't matter. We don't ban based on what they might do, we take actions based on what they have done.

link

theoldones 5.7 years ago

slippery slope progression as demonstrated over months and weeks by the content of his posts changing VS the extreme he's been busted for before

he used to be in one place, he came back at another, and has since been slowly working his way back to actual CP content.

this can be charted, because it's been a continuing problem.

link

Thrus2 5.7 years ago

You could make the argument that banning for what they are leading to is a slippery slope leading to banning for anything someone disagrees with. We are not thought police actions get consequences but something they might do is not reason to take action. If we start doing that Voat is dead as anyone posting content related to violence could be leading to inciting violence or taking action, any post against someone could lead to calling for their death and then killing them.

You repeatedly use this slippery slope claim on this topic but it applies to yourself as well, what you are calling for is a slippery slope to ending free speech on this site.

link