Just checked most of his postings and what I don't understand is what you are claiming here.

He gives posts and evidence of his claims himself but your assertions towards his intentions are vague.

So my question to you is have you checked all of the posts that he has made and double check them?

Here is the deal, usually when someone is giving desinformation they tend to keep their claims vague and also provide conflicting evidence to their claims which then make their assertions fall apart.

When someones looks to proof his point clearly, provides as much evidence that corroborate to the best of their capabilities what they are warning about.

None of the posts that he has done contradict in any way what he is stating: Some users use multiple sources that are proven to be fake news sources and that could have hidden personal interests in the middle of their postings, hidden. Which in fact makes them suspects of the matter. Not guilty. Being a suspect doesn't mean that you are guilty of anything, it just means that we are to be more careful when dealing with you or when checking what you post.

However your post is vague and your reference contradicts what you are saying in your vague comments which means that this complaint of yours is superficial and without substance.

Don't take me wrong, not trying to offend you, but it does seem that you have taken the matter personally against him, whilst he is just being objective, as I am being now, in his denunciations.

So in conclusion, I don't agree with your post. Thanks for leading me to the compendium of evidence he provided though.