Just checked most of his postings and what I don't understand is what you are claiming here.
He gives posts and evidence of his claims himself but your assertions towards his intentions are vague.
So my question to you is have you checked all of the posts that he has made and double check them?
Here is the deal, usually when someone is giving desinformation they tend to keep their claims vague and also provide conflicting evidence to their claims which then make their assertions fall apart.
When someones looks to proof his point clearly, provides as much evidence that corroborate to the best of their capabilities what they are warning about.
None of the posts that he has done contradict in any way what he is stating: Some users use multiple sources that are proven to be fake news sources and that could have hidden personal interests in the middle of their postings, hidden. Which in fact makes them suspects of the matter. Not guilty. Being a suspect doesn't mean that you are guilty of anything, it just means that we are to be more careful when dealing with you or when checking what you post.
However your post is vague and your reference contradicts what you are saying in your vague comments which means that this complaint of yours is superficial and without substance.
Don't take me wrong, not trying to offend you, but it does seem that you have taken the matter personally against him, whilst he is just being objective, as I am being now, in his denunciations.
So in conclusion, I don't agree with your post. Thanks for leading me to the compendium of evidence he provided though.
Being a suspect doesn't mean that you are guilty of anything, it just means that we are to be more careful when dealing with you or when checking what you post.
Frankly old ones. There is enough evidence in madworld's post to accomplish your arrest and scheduling you for a trial. I'm carrying your guilty until proven innocent analogy to it's conclusion here.
This stuff Madworld is exposing is fishy as fuck. You have basically been caught red fucking handed and now you try and defend yourself with some goddamned sophistry.
i see interesting information, i post it, time goes by, what fuck do i give, and then now i suddenly get accused of being a shill. what the fuck are the charges on me.
view the rest of the comments →
sguevar ago
Could you please show references to the claim you are making. I need context to believe a man's word.
theoldones ago
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3001782
below is the part where he shows metrics and attached is a blatant suspect list for each
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3001782/16431113/10
sguevar ago
Just checked most of his postings and what I don't understand is what you are claiming here.
He gives posts and evidence of his claims himself but your assertions towards his intentions are vague.
So my question to you is have you checked all of the posts that he has made and double check them?
Here is the deal, usually when someone is giving desinformation they tend to keep their claims vague and also provide conflicting evidence to their claims which then make their assertions fall apart.
When someones looks to proof his point clearly, provides as much evidence that corroborate to the best of their capabilities what they are warning about.
None of the posts that he has done contradict in any way what he is stating: Some users use multiple sources that are proven to be fake news sources and that could have hidden personal interests in the middle of their postings, hidden. Which in fact makes them suspects of the matter. Not guilty. Being a suspect doesn't mean that you are guilty of anything, it just means that we are to be more careful when dealing with you or when checking what you post.
However your post is vague and your reference contradicts what you are saying in your vague comments which means that this complaint of yours is superficial and without substance.
Don't take me wrong, not trying to offend you, but it does seem that you have taken the matter personally against him, whilst he is just being objective, as I am being now, in his denunciations.
So in conclusion, I don't agree with your post. Thanks for leading me to the compendium of evidence he provided though.
theoldones ago
assumed guilty then. oh joy
can you fucking see the root of my question then?
dontforgetaboutevil ago
Frankly old ones. There is enough evidence in madworld's post to accomplish your arrest and scheduling you for a trial. I'm carrying your guilty until proven innocent analogy to it's conclusion here.
This stuff Madworld is exposing is fishy as fuck. You have basically been caught red fucking handed and now you try and defend yourself with some goddamned sophistry.
theoldones ago
red handed doing what?
i see interesting information, i post it, time goes by, what fuck do i give, and then now i suddenly get accused of being a shill. what the fuck are the charges on me.