You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

argosciv ago

This subverse came up recently, somewhere, in some context(not a good one) and I can't remember why...

Anywho, both the banned user and the subverse owner have negative ccp.

This seems like, honestly, a steaming waste of time for everyone involved.

Silly ban reason, though, given that yes, the banned user can't even downvote...

Not ironically at all, there's that -50 again(banned user's ccp)...

@kevdude @Crensch @MadWorld

Mumbleberry ago

Is this what you're thinking of?

https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/2975467

argosciv ago

Yes actually, it is. Cheers.

Mumbleberry ago

Weird that there's only the one alt left as mod now.

argosciv ago

It is a bit... I wonder what happened there.

*/shrug*

If I may ask, how did you become aware of the ban? Did you just check in there or did the banned user contact you? (not interrogating you btw, just wondering if someone's deliberately trying to take up your time)

Edit: Typo; bane fixed to ban

Mumbleberry ago

I ran across the anon post and it smelled fishy, checked the ban log this am out of curiosity

argosciv ago

Ah yep, fair enough. Yeah I agree, something smells fishy there but at the same time it smells fishy in the sense that it might be a manufactured situation.

Personally I'm not going to spend much time on it, kinda got a full plate as is. But that's just me, others might find more suspicious stuff going on there though.