They have this rigid system whereby if someone meets the requirements and requests the sub first they will get it. So now the community of 50k suffers at the whims of a mad idiot.
Moderator action may either be censorship or curation, depending on the rules of the subverse.
Moderator action may either be censorship or curation depending on the rules the subverse, unless I don't like the moderator, in which case it's censorship.
Moderator action is always censorship, not curation, except in my own subverses - there it's curation.
Content curation is done with the karma system. It shouldn't be up to the mods to decide what is and isn't good. All mods should do it be janitors and clean up spam.
Content "curation" is part of how eddit ended up like it is. I'm not saying I want the sole power to dictate content. I have upvotes and downvotes for that.
LORD_SPARTACUS_00001 ago
pleeze kindely go phuk of bakk too redit
LORD_SPARTACUS_00001 ago
hippocrit much, faggotard?
LORD_SPARTACUS_00001 ago
LOL great job @9-11
MrPim ago
Who the fuck made him a mod of anything?
Mickgoestojail ago
They have this rigid system whereby if someone meets the requirements and requests the sub first they will get it. So now the community of 50k suffers at the whims of a mad idiot.
SkillYourself ago
I'm seriously getting tired of this cunt.
@SaneGoatISwear I hereby charge you with crimes of being an Indonesian muslim government shill. It's all in your post history. How do you plead?
SaneGoatiSwear ago
no.
post curation is not censorship.
user broke the sub rule 2. the spammed the same post using the previous posts as "evidence."
title is non congruous with evidence; user refused to provide actual evidence.
user spammed the post, then went complaining on v/protectvoat
after being clearly told that this is post curation not censorship
user is still free to post and comment in the sub.
SkillYourself ago
"no." isn't a valid defense in the courtoom. You are on trial for being a shill-faggot. How do you plead?
SpottyMatt ago
Now hold up a minute! Pick one:
Sane picks 4.
You seem to be picking 3.
A very vocal segment of Voat picks 1.
I maintain the right answer is 2.
SkillYourself ago
Content curation is done with the karma system. It shouldn't be up to the mods to decide what is and isn't good. All mods should do it be janitors and clean up spam.
SpottyMatt ago
It shouldn't be up to you to decide how every subverse's moderators should behave.
SkillYourself ago
Content "curation" is part of how eddit ended up like it is. I'm not saying I want the sole power to dictate content. I have upvotes and downvotes for that.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
post curation is not censorship.
you're free to post facts with correct titles within the rules
and free to comment
in this sub
you are not being censored.
no matter how much
you can muster
@puttitout check out the tiny little steel balls on this low level shill.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
no. you broke rule 2.
and now you're spamming the post.
at least you've posted this in a sub that's run by the cabal.
you'll be upvoat brigaded to the front page, now.
congratulations on formulating a weak as fuck false-evidence hit piece
v/til is a private sub,
the rules are community driven.
i have never banned a user there.
i only evenly enforce the posting rules that the community made.
if you want to call v/til pro-censorship, you would be calling voat users pro-censorship, which is categorically false.
your post title is incongruous with the link.
your "evidence" shows even post deletion in line with the rules
your title says the opposite.
you will be deleted again if your posts break the rules of the sub, like on any other sub.
and if cynabuns and or puttitout suggest i ban you if you continue to spam, i may consider it, although i really hate the idea.
if this is the kind of shit you contribute to voat, phucks and reddit are that away
Talc ago
The evidence is right there in the modlog. Liar, vote manipulator, and scumbag cannot remove things from the modlog.
Also, anyone who can't handle using markdown syntax should not be moderating a sub.