Religion has nothing to do with basic human decency and morality. When people take their fetish from drawings to the real world a line is crossed and every single one of the those sick fucks that cross that line need to be shot.
Then why the fuck do I see so many comments about sinning and religious faggotry?
When people take their fetish from drawings to the real world a line is crossed and every single one of the those sick fucks that cross that line need to be shot.
That's pushing the agenda. I think he will not cross the line. Same shit with video game violence.
So point out anywhere in my history where I have pushed or supported Christianity?
He already crossed the line you dumb fuck, or else I would not be calling him out for posting a fetish rape video of a real living child.
Here you are defending someone who violated USA law with baseless attacks on me, which is funny considering how your op was bitching about people doing the same to pedos.
Its just a guess here but those so rabid in defense of people like fuark have all the same media he has on their computer without even having a basic grasp of what makes something legal or not.
The "free speech crowd" will defend drawings, they wont defend child predators like you have been.
I think I was defending drawings and I did not take time to find out whether he was a child predator.
You prosecute both, correct? Anyway, I'm tired of this. I don't want to be involved anymore. I think I've made my position clear over 2 posts. The two instances where I support you and the 2 where I don't.
Nope, I dont give fuck what drawings and fake media people like. It is when they cross that line into real children I hate them.
The biggest problem with your attitude is that you think only christcucks care about defending children, it shows a severe lack of basic moral values in you.
The biggest problem with your attitude is that you think only christcucks care about defending children, it shows a severe lack of basic moral values in you.
No. It probably also includes people who support social norms due to instinct and not reason or evidence. And my attitude is well informed given laws that ban both without distinction.
view the rest of the comments →
Octocopter ago
I suggest you go read the user agreement of Voat you retarded pedo defender.
ForTheUltimate ago
Ok. You're still a pathetic religious fundamentalist and I maintain everything I have said.
Octocopter ago
Religion has nothing to do with basic human decency and morality. When people take their fetish from drawings to the real world a line is crossed and every single one of the those sick fucks that cross that line need to be shot.
Better hope you never get found out in real life.
ForTheUltimate ago
Then why the fuck do I see so many comments about sinning and religious faggotry?
That's pushing the agenda. I think he will not cross the line. Same shit with video game violence.
Octocopter ago
So point out anywhere in my history where I have pushed or supported Christianity? He already crossed the line you dumb fuck, or else I would not be calling him out for posting a fetish rape video of a real living child.
Here you are defending someone who violated USA law with baseless attacks on me, which is funny considering how your op was bitching about people doing the same to pedos.
ForTheUltimate ago
It may not be you, but the others. https://voat.co/v/PedosOnVoat/3139354/18215966
where?
you were never specifically mentioned in my post.
Octocopter ago
"you were never specifically mentioned in my post." "Ok. You're still a pathetic religious fundamentalist and I maintain everything I have said."
You are one stupid pedo, its nice knowing the feds will have an easy time prosecuting you.
He even admits to posting it, only deleting it when it gets pointed out he was going to get banned. https://voat.co/v/fuark/3208304/18504763
ForTheUltimate ago
prosecuting me for what?
Octocopter ago
Its just a guess here but those so rabid in defense of people like fuark have all the same media he has on their computer without even having a basic grasp of what makes something legal or not.
The "free speech crowd" will defend drawings, they wont defend child predators like you have been.
ForTheUltimate ago
I think I was defending drawings and I did not take time to find out whether he was a child predator.
You prosecute both, correct? Anyway, I'm tired of this. I don't want to be involved anymore. I think I've made my position clear over 2 posts. The two instances where I support you and the 2 where I don't.
Octocopter ago
Nope, I dont give fuck what drawings and fake media people like. It is when they cross that line into real children I hate them.
The biggest problem with your attitude is that you think only christcucks care about defending children, it shows a severe lack of basic moral values in you.
ForTheUltimate ago
No. It probably also includes people who support social norms due to instinct and not reason or evidence. And my attitude is well informed given laws that ban both without distinction.