Redditor meets a girl | MeanwhileOnReddit

You think pointing out that I had a sociopath junkie for a mom that, unintentionally, showed me the true nature of women at an early age is a 'brag'? How fucking pathetic are you? I had a shitty fucking life but I learned some important lessons. That's not a brag shit-for-brains.

link

Simonsaysgoat 5.5 years ago

I don't think so, some of the most popular subs here are things that reflect the best in our people. Even in unrelated topics I see offhand comments that refer back to wholesome values

link

Dortex 5.5 years ago

Voat is right wing chads

And child porn solicitors.

link

theoldones 5.5 years ago

hey dortex, remember that time you said you'd fuck a 6 year old, then ran a spamlie campaign on me you had to stop spamlinking, because i laced your links with a mega-rebbutal that sowed you were a lying snake?

link

Broc_Lia 5.5 years ago

Not since pizzagate lol

link

Dortex 5.5 years ago

This copypasta begs to differ:

Did you know u/theoldones begged for child porn,repeatedly, and again for good measure, then had a mental breakdown for over a day when he got called out for it? Also u/TruthDefender is his alt.

link

Broc_Lia 5.5 years ago

I don't like that guy (I suspect he's also shadow323), but I think it's pretty obvious he wasn't begging for child porn, he was challenging the guy to cross a line he suspected the guy wasn't actually willing to cross. Nor is trying to clear his name after you accused him of being a pedo a "mental breakdown."

link

Dortex 5.5 years ago

I think it's pretty obvious he wasn't begging for child porn, he was challenging the guy to cross a line he suspected the guy wasn't actually willing to cross.

That "line" being to post child porn. What's it called when you repeatedly request something?

Nor is trying to clear his name after you accused him of being a pedo a "mental breakdown."

Where did I accuse him of being a pedo?

link

Broc_Lia 5.5 years ago

That "line" being to post child porn. What's it called when you repeatedly request something?

You make it sound like he wanted to watch childporn, instead it's pretty clear he was challenging the other guy to live up to his words.

Where did I accuse him of being a pedo?

You accused him of "begging for childporn repeatedly."

link

Dortex 5.5 years ago

You make it sound like he wanted to watch childporn

I've never said he wanted to watch child porn. Where did you see that? I said he begged for child porn. Which he plainly did. You don't even deny it. I don't know about Ireland, but in the US, and Canada, trying to convince others to commit crimes is illegal. And in this case, I'm not talking about slap-on-the-wrist illegal, I'm talking "spend two decades in prison because that's a class B felony" illegal.

You accused him of "begging for childporn repeatedly."

Which is a factual statement linking to the actual thread where one can plainly see the felony taking place. Now if you want to read other stuff into that, that's on you. I don't see why I need to go out of my way to preserve a felon's name. Especially a child porn solicitor's.

link

Broc_Lia 5.5 years ago

I've never said he wanted to watch child porn. Where did you see that? I said he begged for child porn.

Which is a factual statement linking to the actual thread where one can plainly see the felony taking place. Now if you want to read other stuff into that, that's on you.

Oh come on. You knew full well what you were implying. No one's that autistic.

link

Dortex 5.5 years ago

I don't know how I can imply anything when I literally tell you what I mean, link you to the conversations, then have all but one (Crensch) agree my description is perfectly accurate. The only difference is some people like to throw in an implicit "but" and tell me it was all "provocation", as if that's somehow less illegal/disgusting.

I know it's surprising, but sometimes people tell you exactly what they mean and leave no room for ambiguity. If I wanted to call TOO a pedophile, I'd call him a pedophile. It's not like he can do anything about it anyway.

link

Broc_Lia 5.5 years ago

At the very best you mischaractarised what happened. If you don't agree then ok, but that's my take on it having seen the links.

link

Dortex 5.5 years ago

I'm trying to understand how it is you feel I mis-characterized the exchange. From my perspective, I:

1) told you what happened, then you

2)looked at the links and

3) independently concluded the same thing. Only after that, you

4) threw in additional objections to things I never said.

Somewhere between 3 and 4 we're having an issue, and it may be happening with other people who aren't direct enough to actually tell me, unlike you.

link

Broc_Lia 5.5 years ago

Your original post claimed he was "begging for childporn." Begging is a verb which suggests desperation and need on the beggar's part, whereas in fact he exhibited neither desperation nor need, he was issuing a challenge to the guy to put his keyboard where his mouth was. That is not begging.

You then claimed that he "had a mental breakdown" when you called him on it. I see no evidence whatsoever of a mental breakdown. He was clearly just defending himself.

So no, I did not "independently conclude the same thing."

link

Dortex 5.5 years ago

That is not begging.

After the third or fourth time he gets shut down, I would have imagined most people would start to call it "begging". This wasn't a single, isolated (but still illegal) request. It was several. To several different users. Over the course of days.

. I see no evidence whatsoever of a mental breakdown. He was clearly just defending himself.

Interesting take.

So no, I did not "independently conclude the same thing."

Well we agree he solicited child pornography, if nothing else. Looks like this all disagreement boils down to semantics. I would imagine committing felonies would have stood on its own, but apparently semantic issues derail from the real point.

link

Broc_Lia 5.5 years ago

After the third or fourth time he gets shut down, I would have imagined most people would start to call it "begging". This wasn't a single, isolated (but still illegal) request. It was several. To several different users. Over the course of days.

Begging isn't defined by how many times you ask something, it's defined by desperate need. For example: If a cop points his gun at you and repeatedly orders you to get on the ground, it would not be accurate to describe this as "begging." Or if a duelist issued three challenges to an opponent only to be ignored, that could not reasonably be described as "begging."

Well we agree he solicited child pornography

No. I'm pretty sure he posted that knowing the guy wouldn't post childporn, so I don't think it could be described as solicitation. I agree that's a fine distinction though.

I would imagine committing felonies would have stood on its own, but apparently semantic issues derail from the real point.

Everyone commits felonies. The fact that doing something is against the law in one country or another doesn't make it immoral or deserving of censure.

How would you suggest I rephrase this so people understand me better?

Well, first you'd need to explain why you want to spread this so badly.

link

Dortex 5.5 years ago

that could not reasonably be described as "begging."

We'll have to agree to disagree, since this isn't a factual issue, but rather one of perspective. Thanks for sharing yours.

No. I'm pretty sure he posted that knowing the guy wouldn't post childporn, so I don't think it could be described as solicitation.

It can. Also, you're wrong, since he's explicitly stated his intent. You need to be consistent with your arguments. You're not issuing a serious challenge if you don't actually intend anyone to follow through with it. Nobody disagrees he's challenging someone to post child porn. His intent was specifically for it to happen. That it didn't is imaterial.

Everyone commits felonies. The fact that doing something is against the law in one country or another doesn't make it immoral or deserving of censure.

Yes it does. I don't think you understand: This is America. We don't have your stupid "hate speech" laws protecting everyone and everything that isn't white. Our restrictions on speech are probably the most reasonable on the planet. Unless you're about to argue that child porn solicitation isn't absolutely disgusting and shouldn't be an indictable offense, I suggest we stop this line of argument.

In fact, let's stop it regardless. Child porn solicitation is illegal for good reason. The only context it should ever be legal is as a joke. I dare you to disagree.

Well, first you'd need to explain why you want to spread this so badly.

Because I don't think child porn soliciting felons should get to chide others for posting legal content. Much less get them banned. Even less so keep their platform after using it to censor others for doing nothing wrong.