Indeed, but also history, logistics, and transportation are something of a hobby for me. Most of Europe had the means to kill and dispose of millions of people discretely already even before the "concentration camps" were built in the 1940's. You don't need to go much father than the slaughter houses at the railway junctures. A bus load of oblivious Jewish men, women, and children go in and ground human flesh comes out. Load barrels full of human flesh onto train freezer cars, ship them off to receiving locations in Axis controlled North Africa, or the near east, and scatter the material about liberally for use as fertilizer.
Simply shooting them would have been, indeed, MUCH easier, logistically speaking... instead of going through the whole "death camp, gas chambers, armed guards, crematoriums" shtick.
I kind of see your point. Logically speaking, there would have been NO NEED for actual death camps where people were kept for a while and THEN killed, if all one wanted was to dispose of a huge number of people.
I've also long concluded that much of the Jewish community is consciously aware that the "holocaust" as the media presents it to non-Jewish people wasn't the killing of Jewish "concentration" camp prisoners, but the organized mass murder of non-Jewish people from the age of enlightenment period to the present day in retaliation for mass expulsion of Jewish people in prior centuries from those host countries. Given the lengths the oligarchs, through their media and political field proxies, work to suppress discussion on the subject likely means everyone of reasonable intelligence is aware of both the inconsistencies, the scope, and horror of the truth.
LatexSanta ago
Even IF it's NOT a complete hoax, a lot of things about this supposed genocide don't add up.
For info, please see your nearest "holohoax redpill collection."
And even if it WERE true, people should STILL be able to be skeptical about it and question it.
Instead, it's treated as something sacred that absolutely CAN NEVER BE QUESTIONED.
Hmmm. Interesting, veeeeery interesting... isn't it?
carnold03 ago
Indeed, but also history, logistics, and transportation are something of a hobby for me. Most of Europe had the means to kill and dispose of millions of people discretely already even before the "concentration camps" were built in the 1940's. You don't need to go much father than the slaughter houses at the railway junctures. A bus load of oblivious Jewish men, women, and children go in and ground human flesh comes out. Load barrels full of human flesh onto train freezer cars, ship them off to receiving locations in Axis controlled North Africa, or the near east, and scatter the material about liberally for use as fertilizer.
LatexSanta ago
Simply shooting them would have been, indeed, MUCH easier, logistically speaking... instead of going through the whole "death camp, gas chambers, armed guards, crematoriums" shtick.
I kind of see your point. Logically speaking, there would have been NO NEED for actual death camps where people were kept for a while and THEN killed, if all one wanted was to dispose of a huge number of people.
carnold03 ago
I've also long concluded that much of the Jewish community is consciously aware that the "holocaust" as the media presents it to non-Jewish people wasn't the killing of Jewish "concentration" camp prisoners, but the organized mass murder of non-Jewish people from the age of enlightenment period to the present day in retaliation for mass expulsion of Jewish people in prior centuries from those host countries. Given the lengths the oligarchs, through their media and political field proxies, work to suppress discussion on the subject likely means everyone of reasonable intelligence is aware of both the inconsistencies, the scope, and horror of the truth.