After reading this article posted by @Mr_Wolf, I do find it rather hard to believe that Richard Krege's research is conclusive. I would like to see the research for myself. Playing devil's advocate, how can we know that Krege's research is conclusive? It may not have been a death camp, but if people thought it was and were digging around for dat jew gold, then wouldn't Krege's GPR have detected as instead of seeing absolutely nothing?
In 2001, Krege’s findings were presented in an article in the Journal of Historical Review, published by the Institute for Historical Review, an American Holocaust denial organization.[12] Krege announced at that time that his findings were to be published in book form but as of 2014, other than a lone and unsubstantiated computer image on the Internet showing undisturbed ground which Krege claims is representative of his findings at Treblinka,[13] there have been no further articles or books on the matter. Not even Carlo Mattogno, an Italian Holocaust denier, who funded Krege’s research and accompanied him to the site, has been willing to publicly endorse Krege’s spurious findings in the intervening years
His findings aren't available, and the only people arguing against him are professionals with pictures. Seems like one of those moments where they get told to shut up or else.
The ground is supposed to be riddled with bones and what not but there's nothing there. The professionals should have been able to show up and show us that there's bones everywhere.
view the rest of the comments →
OhBlindOne ago
Could someone link his findings?
After reading this article posted by @Mr_Wolf, I do find it rather hard to believe that Richard Krege's research is conclusive. I would like to see the research for myself. Playing devil's advocate, how can we know that Krege's research is conclusive? It may not have been a death camp, but if people thought it was and were digging around for dat jew gold, then wouldn't Krege's GPR have detected as instead of seeing absolutely nothing?
Mr_Wolf ago
Right at the bottom of the article
Historical review 12
His findings aren't available, and the only people arguing against him are professionals with pictures. Seems like one of those moments where they get told to shut up or else.
The ground is supposed to be riddled with bones and what not but there's nothing there. The professionals should have been able to show up and show us that there's bones everywhere.
OhBlindOne ago
I read that part, wasn't sure if there was possibly any bits of his findings out there. Thanks for the response!