Ballot Printing (GreatAwakening)

submitted ago by Blacksmith21

I've discovered 2 interesting things relating to the ballots:

There is a patent for a technology called "gamma printing" which uses gamma radiation emitting particles to watermark documents, and is otherwise undetectable without specialized equipment. This lends validity to the theory of using "isotopes" to mark ballots: https://www.osti.gov/doepatents/biblio/1174865

In the process of researching this, I came across something very interesting:

One of the largest printers of ballots, and provider of election-related services is Runbeck Election Services in AZ: https://runbeck.net/about/our-company/

A little background: https://www.npr.org/2020/05/03/848347895/ballot-printers-increase-capacity-to-prepare-for-mail-voting-surge

So I dug a little. Brian Runbeck, an immediate relation to the CEO of RES, as well as immediate family, are also political donors to ActBlue and Biden For President: https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?contributor_name=runbeck&two_year_transaction_period=2020&min_date=01%2F01%2F2019&max_date=12%2F31%2F2020

Does anyone see a problem with an immediate relation to the the ownership of what is one, if not the largest distributor of ballots in the US, donating to the Democrats?

If anyone has some free time today, more digging is warranted. I've got meetings and will do my best to fill this out more.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Louisiana_Patriot ago

real ballots were water marked and the trap set. Now Trump and Co just sit back and let ALL the fake ballots pour in, with that Trump smile on his face. They took the bait!

wrathfulmomes ago

Printers don't make the paper. So they use the same legit paper to print up extras far ahead of time citing record registration and need for the ballots early.

Now what? This hypothesis is bullshit without proof.

solo7 ago

real ballots may have been printed by that printer with the legitimate paper.

Do you not think the Dem wouldn't have known about the water mark? They may be corrupt, but they're not all stupid.

Louisiana_Patriot ago

Q - "These people are stupid"

wrathfulmomes ago

Good job regurgitating the koolaid.

Now answer the question.

Louisiana_Patriot ago

A random sample of mail-ins are presented to the SCOTUS with proof that ALL mail-ins were water marked. If the mark fails to show, then we have fake ballots, thus we can proceed with a recount and throw out all that don't have the water mark. Would be epic if the water mark was Trump smiling.

wrathfulmomes ago

What part of requesting real ballots to use for fraudulent votes based on inflated requests do you still not get?

langoleer ago

It could be this. What better way to enact new voting laws than holding up this debacle as the reason we need voter ID and in-person voting

Invicta ago

More than 14 million ballots have been reviewed nationwide for the department of homeland security. So far, 80% of the ballots have failed ballot integrity checks under this measure. DHS sting

Cloudrdr ago

Or, we could step up out of the 18th century and develop a rock solid, Quantum based, blockchained national voting system.

One Citizen One Vote

Kwagga ago

Is this fact or pure speculation?

TrulyISayToThee ago

Fully semi-automatic.

ReverendDobbs ago

Sir this is Pure factual speculation.

Kwagga ago

Thank you. So time will tell.

1scm ago

You are clueless. This was already set up after the midterm elections. Watch and learn during the next few days.

ReverendDobbs ago

A stern verbal scolding or GTFO

1scm ago

we let to have some people die dumb.