"To the trolls who celebrated thinking Q made a mistake. As more research is uncovered, it appears the Obama PR team created that George Floyd Twitter card image before he "died", and their test using this validation service was detected by the NSA. BUSTED. https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator"
I was on 8chan the evening Q had the epic twitter control battle with the algorithms (human or AI?) all of us watching were refreshing like crazy to see how it would change back and forth.It was to demonstrate that Q can control media.This is both satisfying and scary
Anons went to POTUS' twitter and what I described above occurred.every qanon on 8chan Qresearch was happy to have witnessed it,gave us insight that there are good guys helping.
Not Made up.Don't care if you don't believe it.
In the interest of Truth I've been digging and considering other people's argument and thus discovered the 'CARD' linked to the site DOES appear now in Oct, April & Feb 2019 so this is not the same as the standard image. The mystery now deepens. Q said "Reconcile"
Image
Image
Image
Image
I'll (let's) step back and consider all possibilities. Logical thinking.... 🤔 Is Q pointing us to something else? Or are we still over the target? Why no tweets reflecting the card from Oct - May 17, 2020?? Twitter trick??
Anyone who is perpetuating the notion that the George Floyd image was uploaded on May 17, before Floyd's death, please stop now....this is 100% false, easy for anyone to debunk, simply by viewing the source code of the Obama site, locating the 'card' image, and seeing that it has the timestamp of 05-30-20 ('053020') in the image url itself. This is auto-generated by WordPress, which powers the Obama site. Please do NOT spread this false interpretation of Q's directive to 'reconcile'.
On the other hand, consider this...The ONLY way I can 'reconcile' this post is that perhaps Q INTENTIONALLY points out the fact that images change on Twitter posts, based on the source website 'card' image. Is there some ramification to this? Other posts where this has occurred, and the original meaning of the tweet was changed because they only needed to swap out the image on their own site? Is he calling them out to this by showing the source code that indicates images are pulled in dynamically?
I don't have enough CCP to post anything, but I would like to enlist others to know if this is a possible interpretation? Are there any Twitter posts (linked to by Q, by deepstate players, etc.) where the original meaning of the tweet is changed and interpreted differently based on the image that was swapped out? Has this been a tool of the deep state (or Q)? Maybe he's using this easily identifiable example to alert us of this Twitter functionality that could be easily exploited?
The only other interpretation is that Q screwed up. There is NO way that image is from before Floyd's death. Please don't perpetuate that notion.
I get that it's not about the GF image, since Q says this is not directed at anons, maybe it has more to do with the who is shifting the message or something similar.
Knowing a bit about coding, but little for Twitter specific. That code bit seems to grab a form (not sure which form). Since it's saying that images are linked to the tweet, could it be a way to make a tweet with a form link that can be updated.
The particular tweet points to Obama originally, then George, and now something new. Since the tweet is pointing to a link, it can be updated?
I think the suggestion is to let those involved with Obama.org to receive a message that they know what Obama was involved in, which does seem to reconcile the image, the tweet, and the not intended for anons.
Lots of words, you cannot gaslight in short form?? You don't know shit. We will perpetuate and believe what we please. I think SBBH is your kind of sub.
This is beyond predictive programming. Way beyond. They don't just predict from possible outcomes, they are seeing fixed outcomes.
Or (thinking out loud here)...or they saw all the outcomes and planned contingencies around all of them. Thats mind blowing.
But Obama...how long did they plan this out? May 17th or earlier? We know now that Floyd and Chauvin were connected to this nightclub that was suspect in money laundering operations.
Maya Santamaria, the club's former owner who sold the venue within the last few months.
Hmmm in the last few months...still digging, anybody have the sayce?
TalesRatKingsTell ago
https://twitter.com/SheepKnowMore/status/1269680088876015618
"To the trolls who celebrated thinking Q made a mistake. As more research is uncovered, it appears the Obama PR team created that George Floyd Twitter card image before he "died", and their test using this validation service was detected by the NSA. BUSTED. https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator"
more commentary:
https://twitter.com/Aaron96859884/status/1269541285813075968
moderator99 ago
This threadreader thread is bullshit.
Just because the guy says he knows something about programming, we're supposed to believe what he claims.
I know some things about programming as well.
That highlighted comment he points to in the article only says the URL can't change. But he ignores the fact that the image embedded in the URL can.
You are being taken way off base.
Q was posting for an entirely different reason.
Post #4438 tells us that.
Christosgnosis ago
Here's an alternative to consider:
Q4436 points out we're dealing with a Jim Jones style religious cult, fully with its own George-Floyd-as-a-martyred-Jesus narrative (let me explain)
TalesRatKingsTell ago
I was on 8chan the evening Q had the epic twitter control battle with the algorithms (human or AI?) all of us watching were refreshing like crazy to see how it would change back and forth.It was to demonstrate that Q can control media.This is both satisfying and scary
Commahorror ago
How long ago, was this?
TalesRatKingsTell ago
several years ago? it was after CBTS on reddit got canned IIRC. I'd hoped somebody on 8chan archived those posts/threads, it was amazing.
moderator99 ago
Whatever you claim Q posted in that 'battle' will be in his posts. So where are they?
Don't make shit up that they aren't there because Q doesn't post outside of what we get.
So where are the posts you speak of?
TalesRatKingsTell ago
Q posted this drop:
Link to Drop 3108
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
17 Mar 2019 - 9:42:20 PM
Hello, Jack.png
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1107462671614570496📁
@Jack
Who has the 'real' control?
Can you remove the top comments?
Q
Anons went to POTUS' twitter and what I described above occurred.every qanon on 8chan Qresearch was happy to have witnessed it,gave us insight that there are good guys helping.
Not Made up.Don't care if you don't believe it.
moderator99 ago
Bullshit. You're going back to March 2019 and telling us they have anything to do with a recent 'battle' on 8kun.
Show me the recent exchange from 8kun that relates to the issue over #4436 #4437.
We've known for a long time that Q team can control twitter if they want to. You aren't making any points here.
OldKnowledgeNew ago
I remeber that was tge only tweet with positive comments first.
superpatriette ago
This changes the whole thread
(11) UPDATE:
In the interest of Truth I've been digging and considering other people's argument and thus discovered the 'CARD' linked to the site DOES appear now in Oct, April & Feb 2019 so this is not the same as the standard image. The mystery now deepens. Q said "Reconcile"
Image
Image
Image
Image
I'll (let's) step back and consider all possibilities. Logical thinking.... 🤔 Is Q pointing us to something else? Or are we still over the target? Why no tweets reflecting the card from Oct - May 17, 2020?? Twitter trick??
Letthepiecesfall17 ago
Anyone who is perpetuating the notion that the George Floyd image was uploaded on May 17, before Floyd's death, please stop now....this is 100% false, easy for anyone to debunk, simply by viewing the source code of the Obama site, locating the 'card' image, and seeing that it has the timestamp of 05-30-20 ('053020') in the image url itself. This is auto-generated by WordPress, which powers the Obama site. Please do NOT spread this false interpretation of Q's directive to 'reconcile'.
On the other hand, consider this...The ONLY way I can 'reconcile' this post is that perhaps Q INTENTIONALLY points out the fact that images change on Twitter posts, based on the source website 'card' image. Is there some ramification to this? Other posts where this has occurred, and the original meaning of the tweet was changed because they only needed to swap out the image on their own site? Is he calling them out to this by showing the source code that indicates images are pulled in dynamically?
I don't have enough CCP to post anything, but I would like to enlist others to know if this is a possible interpretation? Are there any Twitter posts (linked to by Q, by deepstate players, etc.) where the original meaning of the tweet is changed and interpreted differently based on the image that was swapped out? Has this been a tool of the deep state (or Q)? Maybe he's using this easily identifiable example to alert us of this Twitter functionality that could be easily exploited?
The only other interpretation is that Q screwed up. There is NO way that image is from before Floyd's death. Please don't perpetuate that notion.
Notimportant36 ago
I get that it's not about the GF image, since Q says this is not directed at anons, maybe it has more to do with the who is shifting the message or something similar.
Knowing a bit about coding, but little for Twitter specific. That code bit seems to grab a form (not sure which form). Since it's saying that images are linked to the tweet, could it be a way to make a tweet with a form link that can be updated.
The particular tweet points to Obama originally, then George, and now something new. Since the tweet is pointing to a link, it can be updated?
I think the suggestion is to let those involved with Obama.org to receive a message that they know what Obama was involved in, which does seem to reconcile the image, the tweet, and the not intended for anons.
Just my humble guess.
mark7 ago
Lots of words, you cannot gaslight in short form?? You don't know shit. We will perpetuate and believe what we please. I think SBBH is your kind of sub.
pjllama ago
Its pretty easily reconciled if you suppose Q is Gen Flynn or some other patriot boomer and not the prophetic cult leader most try to make it.
Its the same as your father-in-law repeatedly being duped into sharing fake memes on facebook.
OregonAngel2 ago
Could Q have been hacked? That would seem to be another explanation.
angelCole ago
No
MissyRed ago
So... it’s bringing up the topic of images being changed after the fact.
Something to consider in general.
MIDefender ago
But he ends the article noting maybe its not solved. Hmmmm....still confused
1618 ago
Yeah this needs to be seen and to keep eyes on.
Significant to drop #529 January 13, 2018.
If the GF spin is true...
This is beyond predictive programming. Way beyond. They don't just predict from possible outcomes, they are seeing fixed outcomes.
Or (thinking out loud here)...or they saw all the outcomes and planned contingencies around all of them. Thats mind blowing.
But Obama...how long did they plan this out? May 17th or earlier? We know now that Floyd and Chauvin were connected to this nightclub that was suspect in money laundering operations.
Maya Santamaria, the club's former owner who sold the venue within the last few months.
Hmmm in the last few months...still digging, anybody have the sayce?
Adopted-Patriot ago
Thought I saw on Q page here that nightclub was owned by Ilhan Omar’s father’s company. Maybe someone else saw it.
moderator99 ago
I've got the image saved:
https://files.catbox.moe/7eum53.jpeg
MAIDENanon ago
works for me.