I reacted too quickly to the controversy that was surrounding all the discussion over the date-timestamp of the linked tweet
Here's my latest perspective (which is actually what my initial perspective was because I didn't first notice the May 17th date-timestamp when I went to look at the tweet):
view the rest of the comments →
25140875 ago
There HAS to be a logical explanation for this...
Grunge ago
the next Q post was "not all posts are meant for anons"
seems like Q is backtracking, making excuses.
Christosgnosis ago
yeah, sure looks that way - Q not wanting to admit to a fuck-up
robertdebruce ago
hey that same statement was made by a shill on 8 kun.
Christosgnosis ago
I reacted too quickly to the controversy that was surrounding all the discussion over the date-timestamp of the linked tweet
Here's my latest perspective (which is actually what my initial perspective was because I didn't first notice the May 17th date-timestamp when I went to look at the tweet):
Q4436 points out we're dealing with a Jim Jones style religious cult, fully with its own George-Floyd-as-a-martyred-Jesus narrative (let me explain)