For fresh eyes to this sort of malarkey, Consensus Cracking Sock Puppeteering is where an individual - or a group of individuals who collaborate outside the walls of Voat - come here to manufacture a consensus view among the users here
where this differs from honest persuasion and argumentation is in the Fraudulent Fabrication of agreement or disagreement around certain topics
I'd like you all to cast a cynical eye over this conversational thread here
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3791132/23591966
me paraphrasing for emphasis:
1 "I have something very important to say"
2 "oh wow you seems very important, just by your user name alone i can tell you have gems of wisdom to impart. tell me more, oh authoritative one"
3 "yes they are important, listen to them"
1 "I'm glad you asked, blah blah "
It's pretty obvious to experienced eyes that this is one person using a sock puppet larp to manufacture a conversation - or possibly two people with a prior agreement to construct a discussion
This sock puppetteering goes the other way, too. If you were to post something important and valuable that fucks up their disinformation campaign, one jerk will jump on 5 sock puppet accounts to all shitpost under your contribution, in order to make people think in herd mentality that your view is unpopular, therefore musnt be credible
these people are very organised with Malice Aforethought. 3 years ago they made dozens and dozens of sleeper accounts that spring to life after significant dormancy to suddenly be very assertive and opinionated
NOTES for users :
- Sock Puppeteering is a bannable offence
- Consensus Cracking is a bannable offence
- The topic of Racine Wisconsin is not off limits . But if you are going to post about it, just post like a normal fucking person with relevant links and make your points clear and not wanky cryptics.
and no, Q's cryptics arent wanky. They are a necessity bc team Q needs plausible deniability. You dont. You need plausible Credibility
Edit: and before anyone else doubts me spare yourself the Faggotry Aforethought by seeing how they have admitted their consensus cracking in the comments below by freshly created user @consesuscracker
view the rest of the comments →
TexasPatriot972 ago
I’ve seen the tides turning. Drudge and Fox joining the “resistance” at such a time is interesting. Makes one wonder if someone funded Drudge and if a move to the left was a condition of the Disney money going to Fox. This in mind, and knowing about “4am talking points”, there’s got to be some hub that organizes these people and mobilizes them. Finding and outing their “safe house” would be great.
Ddboomer ago
I think the Chinese bought Drudge?! I believe I read that somewhere, but I read a ton of stuff. :-)
The Drudge has been compromised for a while now. It was obvious when it happened. Sad.