For fresh eyes to this sort of malarkey, Consensus Cracking Sock Puppeteering is where an individual - or a group of individuals who collaborate outside the walls of Voat - come here to manufacture a consensus view among the users here
where this differs from honest persuasion and argumentation is in the Fraudulent Fabrication of agreement or disagreement around certain topics
I'd like you all to cast a cynical eye over this conversational thread here
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3791132/23591966
me paraphrasing for emphasis:
1 "I have something very important to say"
2 "oh wow you seems very important, just by your user name alone i can tell you have gems of wisdom to impart. tell me more, oh authoritative one"
3 "yes they are important, listen to them"
1 "I'm glad you asked, blah blah "
It's pretty obvious to experienced eyes that this is one person using a sock puppet larp to manufacture a conversation - or possibly two people with a prior agreement to construct a discussion
This sock puppetteering goes the other way, too. If you were to post something important and valuable that fucks up their disinformation campaign, one jerk will jump on 5 sock puppet accounts to all shitpost under your contribution, in order to make people think in herd mentality that your view is unpopular, therefore musnt be credible
these people are very organised with Malice Aforethought. 3 years ago they made dozens and dozens of sleeper accounts that spring to life after significant dormancy to suddenly be very assertive and opinionated
NOTES for users :
- Sock Puppeteering is a bannable offence
- Consensus Cracking is a bannable offence
- The topic of Racine Wisconsin is not off limits . But if you are going to post about it, just post like a normal fucking person with relevant links and make your points clear and not wanky cryptics.
and no, Q's cryptics arent wanky. They are a necessity bc team Q needs plausible deniability. You dont. You need plausible Credibility
Edit: and before anyone else doubts me spare yourself the Faggotry Aforethought by seeing how they have admitted their consensus cracking in the comments below by freshly created user @consesuscracker
view the rest of the comments →
alphazebra ago
I’ve noticed that too. Then a bunch of supporting comments are names I’ve never seen before. Us regulars are pretty familiar with the commenters and poster handles.
FLWFellowship ago
Racine, Wisconsin is the most off-limits topic related to Pizzagate. One reason is because the Anon before Q was SenateAnon who said this before they vanished to never return:
Jenny Moore’s last submission after they banned her from Pizzagate is here: @jem777
She is not the only one who was murdered for knowing The Truth.
Recently @gamepwn had his life threatened by former moderators for digging into Racine. Any others who dare investigate Racine are threatened, censored and banned as @ababcb @manyx and others have proven.
Srayzie and Shizy were running open blackmail operations on these forums. They then became sudden “victims” and resigned from their positions in a virtual false flag.
This new sticky post was created because the comment below became a bit too popular by pointing out the absolute hypocrisy of the moderators here.
Despite lying to everyone and saying the moderators do not delete comments, they absolutely did delete comments and lied to everyone saying they did not delete the comments, falsely claiming that the comments were “self-deleted”. The proof is in the link to the right under Removed Comments where it clearly states that Crensch deleted them.
The moderators manipulate the forum to hide and obfuscate The Truth that does not fit their agenda. This is after multiple members of the Pizzagate forum were slandered, doxxed, threatened, attacked and murdered in real life. This is not a joke or a game.
The comments below caused too much attention and now the moderators are warning others of “sock puppet” accounts because they ban any accounts that bring up Racine.
In many years, no one has been able to disprove any of the points made about Racine. Quite the opposite, when anyone does verify the information to be accurate and astounding, they are immediately attacked, downvoted, slandered, mocked, lied about, threatened, censored and banned.
Vindicator, Crensch, DarkKnight111, MolochHunter, Argosciv and a few others are all actively manipulating the forum to hide The Truth they cannot allow anyone to know. Argosciv is an admitted to Satan worship and blood drinking and Vindictor openly promotes Santa / Satan making a ‘naughty list’ on his Twitter account profile Vindic8tor - notice the images he uses and the missing Christ in Christmas. They openly mock Jesus Christ and The Truth and disclose Voat for what it really is - a honeypot.
We are the reason for the Tarmac meeting involving Paul Ryan. We are the reason why Reddit Pizzagate was shut down. We are the reason why they changed the rules at Voat and initiated the login screen.
Here was the comment that led to this “sticky post”:
What is The Truth they cannot allow The World to Know?
Why did George Webb Sweigert claim to have met Jesus Christ in Racine with Jenny?
What really happened to @Jem777 and @Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt?
Did the virus really begin in the US on January 15th, or is everyone being lied to?
Racine, Wisconsin is the “Root” and model for the real agenda beyond 21 and 2030 forged by the Great Deception of Sustainability (Satan’s Ability) with the Mark of the Beast enforced by 5G+ AI, Smart Cities, Resilient Communities and Community Policing.
This is The Parousia.
consensuscracker8 ago
Look at how they falsely claim that the account i had to make after being banned @consensuscracker4 was banned for Pornographic Images when anyone can easily verify by clicking on that account that I did not post pornographic images.
What I DID post was a link to an article that proved that a Police Chief in Racine County was convicted of possessing child porn.
voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3792911/23604781
consensuscracker2 ago
That's because they instantly ban anyone and everyone talking about this topic so they have to make new accounts. Look at ALL of the recent posts by my now banned account @ababcb and use your own common sense to decide whether or not I was a "sock puppet" account. That account had over 1600+ submission contribution points and over 1100 upvotes. That is not the hallmark of a sockpuppet account.
MolochHunter ago
you still think this is about racine, and not your retarded disingenuous conduct
says something about your faculties
consensuscracker3 ago
obviously that's not true. nobody is permitted to talk about Racine and this is proven by the fact that my posts are full of well sourced information that you clearly don't want anyone to see. like this.