PGLiterati2 ago

I have always believed this. The impeachment thing was total BS, and killed any meaningful investigation of Whitewater and other Clinton crimes, such as the activities in Mena, the Arkansas state patrol and a list that could continue on. Lewinsky was nothing, and more Americans were upset that their kids had to hear the details discussed on TV than cared about the sex. Starr has some very questionable activities in his background.

kestrel9 ago

and a list that could continue on...

Agree, so much fake news for so long, and so many awful crimes in plain sight, yet hidden and/or downplayed by the circus clowns.

PGLiterati2 ago

I actually sent my best friend of 30 years (a Hillary supporter) a 76 page article, printed, about their crimes. She threw up her hands and voted independent. If people took the time to read what is documented, and felt outrage, they would have been taken out long ago.....

kestrel9 ago

Fake News propaganda has steered people away from even considering to read what is documented. The enormity of the psyop to keep people in the dark, even when information is available, has created social ills, to cover up even worse social ills, corruption and evil. They (Fake News Industrial Complex) really are the enemy of the people.

1Paydaddy ago

Star and Douschowitz should be pushing a broom in Gitmo, Prove me wrong.

kestrel9 ago

I don't think you're wrong.

1Paydaddy ago

Might be they are angling for leniency?

kestrel9 ago

Good one, why didn't I think of that? ;)

1Paydaddy ago

Logical thinking Q taught us. Nice to hear from you Patriot!

GoodGodKirk ago

Are you sure? Starr is on defense, not prosecution.

1Paydaddy ago

Star has not played any part thus far in the plan. Logical thinking says he's compromised.

kestrel9 ago

Yes I'm sure. And with Starr being on Trump defense, it makes me wonder whether he will be exposed (like others that were supposedly 'on Trump's side'), OR whether he is now free from some blackmail situation/threat, etc. that he may have had in the past? I'm just wondering.

GoodGodKirk ago

That's just stupid to bring him on the defense. Leaks would occur if true.

kestrel9 ago

Whatever the situation really is, Q team is aware of it. Trap? (Not for Trump) Maybe Opportunity for old info to surface under a new light, old swamp creatures (connected to other countries?) end up with exposure? Read my post about James Riady a lot of connections I see not fleshed out regarding old topics A LOT of them. Arkansas, Chinese Intelligence, Indonesia, Obama, Jacksons Stephens, Lippo Group … where it stops nobody knows? http://archive.is/hbBQ4

kestrel9 ago

From same link, "During the time Starr was investigating the Clintons, Starr was working for a company wholly owned by Chinaís Peoples Liberation Army and notorious arms dealer Wang Jun

Also, "The Real Ken Starr" (From Hillary's Secret War)

Wang Jun was one of Starr's personal legal clients. While serving as independent counsel, Starr simultaneously argued a case before the National Labor Relations Board on behalf of one of Wang's companies, CitiSteel, a subsidiary of CITIC. Wang Jun serves as chairman of CITIC, but the company is wholly owned by the Peoples' Liberation Army of China. Starr won the case for his Chinese clients.

In addition to being a major arms dealer, Wang Jun is also a high-level Chinese military intelligence operative and one of the major players in the Chinagate scandal. In ordinary times, the mere fact that Ken Starr was on Wang Jun's payroll would have disqualified him from acting as independent counsel. But these were not ordinary times.

...

Hill told Ruddy that Starr's entire investigative team had been infiltrated by Clinton operatives. Even the FBI agents assigned to Starr "were not working for Ken Starr in his Whitewater probe but for Reno and the White House, giving the Clinton administration de facto control over the Starr investigations," writes Christopher Ruddy. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1443444/posts

1Paydaddy ago

George Nader just plead guilty to laundering Clinton cash and child trafficking.Ken Star appears out of nowhere. My opinion is Trump is on offense not defense.

kestrel9 ago

My opinion is Trump is on offense not defense.

I agree.