Ken Starr - The Clinton's Accomplice
Nolanda Hill's comments
Source: NewsMax.com
Published: July 1, 1999
Author: Chris Ruddy
http://archive.is/X38JK#selection-41.3-46.0
As the long-time lover and business partner of Clinton confidant Ron Brown, Nolanda Hill had intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton White House.
As a result of Congressional complaints, Janet Reno was forced to appoint an Independent Counsel to investigate Brown, his business dealings with Nolanda Hill, Brown's son Michael, and several other people.
The Independent Counsel in this case was Daniel Pearson from Miami. Unlike Starr, Pearson and his deputy were no one's patsies. Instead of using Starr's delaying tactics, Pearson had, within months, built a strong case against Brown, Brownís son, and Hill. Nolanda Hill told me they were going to be indicted.
Then Brown made a desperate bid to save himself. Just weeks before his death on April 6, 1996 Brown met with Clinton at the White House and made it clear he was not going to take the fall for an administration rampant with corruption. Brown wanted Clinton to handle Pearson the same way the White House had handled Starr.
Handled Starr?
Hill explained. Starr was appointed Independent Counsel in August of 1994, after the three-judge panel decided not to appoint Robert Fiske. The Clinton White House publicly expressed outrage that Starr, a "partisan" Republican, had been selected as Independent Counsel.
That's the way the Clintons wanted the world to see it.
In fact, Hill told me, "when Starr was appointed, they were opening champagne bottles in the White House, they were celebrating. According to Hill, Starr has actually been on Janet Reno's short list for the post of Special Counsel at the time she picked Robert Fiske.
"They would never had put him on the short list if they were worried about him," she said.
In his meeting with Clinton, Brown knew that Starr was under the White House's thumb. He pleaded with Clinton to do the same with Pearson by having Reno interfere in Pearson's probe, and by ordering Justice Department attorneys on Pearson's staff to back off.
Brown also asked Clinton to have the FBI obstruct the Pearson probe by withholding critical information. Brown, Hill said, was well aware that FBI agents were not working for Ken Starr in his Whitewater probe but for Reno and the White House, giving the Clinton Administration de facto control over the Starr investigations.
According to Hill, Clinton told Brown not to worry. "I'll take care of it," Clinton said.
Just weeks later, Brown's plane mysteriously crashed into the side of a mountain in Yugoslavia and the Pearson probe was closed.
PGLiterati2 ago
I have always believed this. The impeachment thing was total BS, and killed any meaningful investigation of Whitewater and other Clinton crimes, such as the activities in Mena, the Arkansas state patrol and a list that could continue on. Lewinsky was nothing, and more Americans were upset that their kids had to hear the details discussed on TV than cared about the sex. Starr has some very questionable activities in his background.
kestrel9 ago
Agree, so much fake news for so long, and so many awful crimes in plain sight, yet hidden and/or downplayed by the circus clowns.
PGLiterati2 ago
I actually sent my best friend of 30 years (a Hillary supporter) a 76 page article, printed, about their crimes. She threw up her hands and voted independent. If people took the time to read what is documented, and felt outrage, they would have been taken out long ago.....
kestrel9 ago
Fake News propaganda has steered people away from even considering to read what is documented. The enormity of the psyop to keep people in the dark, even when information is available, has created social ills, to cover up even worse social ills, corruption and evil. They (Fake News Industrial Complex) really are the enemy of the people.
1Paydaddy ago
Star and Douschowitz should be pushing a broom in Gitmo, Prove me wrong.
kestrel9 ago
I don't think you're wrong.
1Paydaddy ago
Might be they are angling for leniency?
kestrel9 ago
Good one, why didn't I think of that? ;)
1Paydaddy ago
Logical thinking Q taught us. Nice to hear from you Patriot!
GoodGodKirk ago
Are you sure? Starr is on defense, not prosecution.
1Paydaddy ago
Star has not played any part thus far in the plan. Logical thinking says he's compromised.
kestrel9 ago
Yes I'm sure. And with Starr being on Trump defense, it makes me wonder whether he will be exposed (like others that were supposedly 'on Trump's side'), OR whether he is now free from some blackmail situation/threat, etc. that he may have had in the past? I'm just wondering.
GoodGodKirk ago
That's just stupid to bring him on the defense. Leaks would occur if true.
kestrel9 ago
Whatever the situation really is, Q team is aware of it. Trap? (Not for Trump) Maybe Opportunity for old info to surface under a new light, old swamp creatures (connected to other countries?) end up with exposure? Read my post about James Riady a lot of connections I see not fleshed out regarding old topics A LOT of them. Arkansas, Chinese Intelligence, Indonesia, Obama, Jacksons Stephens, Lippo Group … where it stops nobody knows? http://archive.is/hbBQ4
kestrel9 ago
From same link, "During the time Starr was investigating the Clintons, Starr was working for a company wholly owned by Chinaís Peoples Liberation Army and notorious arms dealer Wang Jun
Also, "The Real Ken Starr" (From Hillary's Secret War)
...
1Paydaddy ago
George Nader just plead guilty to laundering Clinton cash and child trafficking.Ken Star appears out of nowhere. My opinion is Trump is on offense not defense.
kestrel9 ago
I agree.