check this out ... listen carefully. https://youtu.be/Fs0pZ_GrTy8?t=4234. And check on what has been done.

hmmm, interesting perspective! And I commend you for your honesty in this. Appreciated!

I have thought about the Adam and Eve story too. And honestly, the story is not what I was told it was. O yes, Adam whined like a good little bitch for not taking responsibility, he was hugely in denial: Your fault God. that bitch you gave me, that cost me my rib. Seen from this perspective, it is quite amusing. He could neither claim incompatibility of genes or jeans. Have tried sowing figleaves together? ... I did ... it did not hold long ....hahahaha

In Greek mythology, there is also the same kind of story of Prometheus and Epimetheus. This has to do with types of thinking. planning, execution, evaluation, best practices, in modern parlance. Prometheus stole the art of fire from the gods, and was punished for eternity to a life of pain. His liver was daily removed by a bird of prey, and grew again after it was removed.

Eating from the tree of knowledge, or rather it's fruit, would entail: knowing good and evil. Here is the thing: what doe it mean to know? Interestingly, to know a woman, is having sexual intercourse with her. It is an act of intimate familiarity. Applying this view onto knowing good and evil, it is a fact of live, we now come to intimately familiar with both. In that sense they, and by extension, we, have become like God, knowing it. This is not about deciding what is good and evil, but being intimately familiar with it,

Proverbs 1-5 goes into the art of gaining wisdom, or applied knowledge. The two women that can be embraced are a foreign alien one, and a domestic one. The former is the stupid choice, the latter the smart one. But wisdom does not spring from external sources, but from within.

So, it is not knowledge that lead to the fall. In essence, you could say, before eating from the knowledge of the Gods, they were nescient, bliss in only knowing what they knew, and that was not much. Our curse, if you want to call it that, is choice.

When you read the letters and book of the founding fathers, it is inescapable to note they speak of virtue in the classical sense. Virtues, the RCC has expanded upon, as they were handed down by classical thinkers. And only a virtuous and religious people were calculated as being capable of keeping The Republic they created. Ironicly, compare th writings of Thomas Jefferson with his presidential decisions ..... If it was hard in 1790, when the country was smaller, and society less complex, by Jove, how difficult must it be today?

You could say, God is the unifying principle under which people tend to seek not only their own advantage, but also that of others with whom they are compacted into a social construct, be it family, tribe or Nation. For this reason, they grappled with the problem of slaves. Interestingly, from what I read, they considered it to be abolished by each and every ones own moral considerations, as a matter of choice. Virtue alone did not lead the Romans to abolish slavery. Far from it, although Marcus Aurelius was no fan of the Colosseum. But virtue and the unifying principle leads to the moral choice of rejecting slavery. Another example: In Roman law, in case you were being cheated knowingly (to good to be true, is probably not true), it is on your own head. If you do not stand up for your rights, you have no rights.

Hence, also, their reluctance when it came to Jewish faith, as the Talmud does not reject it. Quite the contrary: institutes and promotes it. I think the acquisition of land in Africa, called Liberia, as a new homeland for black slaves, is an interesting move to obtain an equitable and practical solution to the question of virtue and religiousness. In a way, it is reminiscent of the Jubilee, as mentioned in the books of Moses. (Jesus words: had you believed Moses ..., which he knew they did not, but believed the Talmud)

The current economical and social state of our societies is such that after 100 years of incessant brainwashing in feminism and trans-/ multigenderism, a sudden change seems not viable. So, the prerequisites need to be enhanced that by choice, people can be virtuous and religious without problem. Those that still have problems to accommodate this change back to normalcy, are not left out hanging in the wind, but are enticed by choice and example to rethink their ways. And what better way to penetrate their brainwashed mind, than to provide for better opportunity?

in essence, this is what Potus said during his second address to the UN about Us national sovereignty. Not as a bully, but as an example to follow by choice.