I know this will be a controversial topic, but as you all know, we’ve been programmed since we were born to believe what we were taught in school. The media and entertainment industry continue to program us.
Us red pilled Patriots do not just believe what we’re told. We’re no longer blind sheep. We do our own research and spread the word. So why not do the same when it comes to the Holocaust?
For over 2 years now, many people on Voat have said that the Holocaust was a lie. I’ve been researching the subject and found an awesome website about it on https://8ch.net/qresearch. I was up late reading this last night, and I am convinced now that we were absolutely lied to. I’m not saying people didn’t die, but the whole story is very different than we’ve been taught to believe.
There are tons of pictures included. It’s a very interesting read no matter what your belief is regarding the Holocaust. So for those of you that are curious, here’s the link...
https://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com/
view the rest of the comments →
I_lost_my_password ago
You have now taken your first step into the real great awakening. Keep up your research and you will begin to see everything going on today and for the last century with increasing clarity.
zxcvzxcv ago
The facts the holocaust was a hoax and that jews are the enemy and that Hitler was the good guy seems, at least to me, like the biggest red pill a person can swallow. It is even harder for people to accept that than people accepting pedovours and hidden cancer cures. Are you suggesting there is more to this awakening? Please dish the info if you have it! At least give direction to my research.
the_art_collector ago
Hitler played a good guy. That doesn't mean he was one.
zxcvzxcv ago
I'm open to looking at evidence if you have any.
the_art_collector ago
There's plenty.
First, there are reasons to believe Hitler threw the game:
http://subversify.com/2012/02/10/did-hitler-deliberately-lose-the-war/
Next, you've got the Nazi occult/illuminati connection. Lightning bolt, Vatican, occult military division.
Last consider that the illuminati themselves are big fans. You see nazi symbolism in occult album imagery, and the British royal family are notorious fans.
zxcvzxcv ago
Ok, here are some quotes from your article:
"The main facts are pretty well known: he took over Germany, made himself dictator, militarised the country, tried to wipe out the Jews, ... and anyone else who even thought of disagreeing with him, and then went and started (well, not technically, since Britain and France actually declared war on Germany, but he was directly responsible for creating the circumstances for said declaration) a war with half the world." (seriously..."tried to wipe out the jews"...you mean with his wooden door technology? This is the same guy who wrote "if I were an academic historian I’d have specialised in the Third Reich"....yet this nazi specialist seems to have no idea about basic historical concepts that are easily researched... Remember the Ruhr? Remember Danzig? Remember Versailles? Oh, I guess this "historian" forgot about those.)
"The Germans wanted, in the meantime, a road through the Polish Corridor so that the two parts of Germany were connected by other than sea or air. So, Hitler demanded Danzig and the road through the Corridor." (ummm...no. Germany wanted the Polish jews to stop murdering and raping Germans. I guess the "historian and nazi expert" forgot about the million+ refugee crisis that the jew-poles created).
"As Hitler had no reason to want war with either France or Britain, this was even more inexplicable." (...just wow. I guess this "nazi expert" forgot to read mein kampf)
"instead of either making peace with Britain or fighting it out to a conclusion, he shifted his attention elsewhere." (hitler had not choice. the french were defeated and a land invasion against the UK was not possible with peace still on the table. I guess the "historian" forgot about the peace treaties hitler was sending to the UK. USSR was always Hitler's primary goal, and with western europe secured, it was time).
"Stalin had, via his foreign minister Molotov, offered an alliance against the Western Allies, with the end objective of carving up the French and British colonial empires between the Axis members. (A man of honor does not make an alliance in order to steal; hitler wanted to save the world from evil, not use evil to steal the world).
"while the Wehrmacht was fighting a street-by-street battle in the ruins of the city, the Russians prepared a colossal counteroffensive against the weak Nazi flanks. In November, they launched this offensive and cut off the Sixth Army.Even then, Hitler could have retreated. but Hitler forbade any attempt at retreat. (Hitler tried several times to save them, but by then, his resources were dwindling and did not have the ability to do so).
"Hitler, who was in full command of the German Army, and who was used to ordering his generals around (as at Stalingrad), and had no desire to launch this attack, went ahead and let it happen anyway, despite knowing it must be defeated. How does one explain this?" (first, that is not how nazism worked... individual responsibility prevailed in nazism, and so hitler would have given orders, but the generals would have decided what was and was not possible and the best way to accomplish this; the orders hitler likely gave was this: 'we must win here, or else we will lose the war for the following reasons...and if we lose the war, the marxists will kill all of us and rape our womem'. And so they went for it, despite all odds.)
"Stalin was always far and away the most pragmatic of all the major leaders of the war, on either side. It is highly likely that at that stage of the war, when victory was still far from assured, he would have jumped at the chance for this separate peace, with the withdrawal of German troops and some kind of compensation from Berlin, probably in territorial terms. But Hitler refused even to try." (you have literally must be kidding me. was this article written by the mossod? this guy claims to be a "nazi expert" and yet his statements make it clear that he has never read mein kampf. To me, it seems the argument that this article is written by a jew is actually becoming more and more likely the longer I read)
"The Alliance with Mussolini: I’ll intrude a personal note here – I could never understand just what Hitler wanted to ally with il Duce for. He brought absolutely nothing to the table. By allying with him, Hitler merely made Italy’s problems his own." (what!?!? read MK, you idiot author! Hitler knew that Spain was germany's only real ally, Hitler thought it possible that the UK would ally with germany if the brits hadn't been completely cuckolded by the jews. hitler was hoping there were enough good men left in the UK to know this. by 1944, he realized his hope in the brits had been in vain.)
"It’s telling that (Antony Beevor, Berlin, The Downfall 1945) Hitler’s generals had begun to feel he was subconsciously trying to lose the war." (yes, let's quote as a source a book written by jews that is about hitler...I'm sure it will be filled with a bunch of really really true facts and stuff. muh 6 million!)
"It was only after January 1942, or in other words after the Reich had quite signally failed to beat the British or the Russians, and in addition had just acquired a powerful new enemy in the US, that Hitler began a campaign of systematic extermination." (ahahahahahahahaha! wooden door technology! ahahahaha!)
"Hitler was concerned with not allowing any of his subordinates to become so powerful as to threaten his own position, he made sure they competed against each other constantly." (hahahahah...you have no idea how wrong this is. you think 'struggling against one another' violates nazi principles... ahahaha! hitler literally wrote the book about his 'struggle').
"how could Hitler risk peace, where his position as God Almighty’s Representative on Earth and Ordained Ruler of the German People might be threatened?" (now this is getting abysmal and I'm sorry for myself that I've read this far into this shame of article. it is little more than a fairly tale. And to top it all over, the article ends talking about the degenerate jew Sigmund Freud. you have got to be kidding me. If you have a real source you would like to provide, I am still open to research, but do not post any more fake jew dribble like you did in your previous post.
the_art_collector ago
I actually saw the red flags at the beginning but was hoping at least some of it would be accurate. As far as his military leadership feeling that he was was trying to lose the war, I got that more from the number of military leaders plotting to assassinate him towards the end.
zxcvzxcv ago
I am sure that some of it was accurate. (((they))) always mix truth in with the lies to make the lies harder to see. The author was betting that most people hadn't read MK and so he got lazy, which made his lies easy to see. The assassination attempts are easily explained. At least one attempt (that I know of) was made by jews who had infiltrated the military and so I assume they were under orders from the marxist cabal.
Other attempts were legitimate attempts by disloyal leaders. This occurred because those soldiers were put into a hopeless situation and Hitler asked them to fight on even thought it was impossible. They thought that by eliminating Hitler, they could sue for peace, but their reasoning was flawed. Hitler knew what was coming, and that is why he asked the impossible of them. After the war, just look what happened to those Nazi leaders at the Nuremberg trails. They were tortured so badly that they didn't even know what they "admitted" to doing. Many were tortured to death in attempts to get "confessions". And the Nazi soldiers who surrendered were starved to death in allied camps. Others surrendered only to be murdered by the marxists. Look at what happened to the Cossacks at Lienz. Hitler knew this would happen, and that is why he gave those impossible orders. When ordered to do the impossible, it is reasonable for some men to flee.
But on the other hand, imagine where Germany could be today if Hitler had won: the world at peace, disease and hunger ended, and mankind finally uniting together to conquer the stars. But instead, look at what the marxists have given to Germany: https://files.catbox.moe/2ch502.jpg
ifuckdolphinseverday ago
You mean those runes that have been around for thousands of years and that have no relation to the Illuminati in anyway?
IdoubtIt2 ago
Yep. Prince Edward in particular, right? It was a big scandal at the time for the “royal family” once it got out what a huge supporter he was. Funny that, eh?
RockmanRaiden ago
Very nice. The meme that Hitler was a hero is hilarious. In my opinion, and I'm welcome to be corrected, he sold out for safety. Witness protection program in South America basically.
IdoubtIt2 ago
I wish for the life of me I could remember what documentary I saw years ago. It went into detail the men behind Hitler, it was 4 in particular IIRC, and made him into what he was. Taught him how to speak publicly, funded the SS, the whole thing. I’ve heard the Rothschild played both sides (no surprise there) but cannot remember if that’s who these men were. It was the first time I really questioned the “Hitler as world’s greatest monster” narrative. Really wish I could remember the documentary. Interestingly enough, it was a cable network, so fairly mainstream.
RockmanRaiden ago
That's something I definitely want to look at.