(NSFW) The NZ Shooting and Bloodstain Pattern Analysis

I decided to make this post after a handful of comments today on this subject. I welcome the collective mind to murderboard this theory with facts and science. Shills, save your shit for someone else.

BLUF: Video “broadcast” by the “shooter” in the Christchurch, NZ mosque video shows very strong evidence that none of the victims in the main hall were shot with a with a high-velocity, small-caliber 5.56 rifle round as evidenced by Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA). Background: Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (also known as Blood Spatter Analysis) is a forensic science relying heavily on ballistics, mathematics, physics, serology, hematology, materials engineering and other hard sciences. BPA recreates the actions of a shooting based on the science and data behind gunshot wounds (GSW). BPA discoveries are widely recognized as near irrefutable science in a court of law in the United States. BPA background:

• https://gizmodo.com/physicists-are-sciencing-the-shit-out-of-gunshot-blood-1784548597

• http://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/blood/principles.html

• https://www.ifscolorado.com/bloodstain-pattern-analysis/

• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340918314689

Let’s look at some real gunshot wounds (NSFW):

• Gunshot victim, unknown caliber: https://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/images-articles/computersvstrings-fig6.jpg (note volume of blood; shot pointing downward)

• Wall shot: https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/10180000/gettyimages-157649729-800x533.jpg

• A more horizontal shot – Note the very large drops, fast bleed out: https://66.media.tumblr.com/c5827528f2e25f808667e8fee7d71df0/tumblr_nk4maiKNkQ1u2roero1_400.jpg

• Arterial spraying (lots of people shot and no spraying?): http://cristabuscheforensics.weebly.com/uploads/2/0/9/4/20946836/6902936.jpg?505

• And one last wall shot: https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/blood-staining-on-white-tiled-wall-picture-id174653420

• Note figure 2 – 30 caliber cartridge, self-inflicted. Headshots are a huge mess: https://medcraveonline.com/FRCIJ/FRCIJ-04-00117.pdf

Now let’s look at some examples of BPA from the main hall in the Mosque (Linwood? if someone can fill in the name of the building, I’d be grateful):

Source: https://www.bestgore.com/murder/livestream-video-deadly-shooting-attack-mosque-christchurch-new-zealand/

• @6:58: Shooter fires an almost level trajectory at 10-12 people. No blood spatter on the wall: https://files.catbox.moe/cg8yqp.GIF

• @07:04: Shooter gets head/upper torso shot against the outside corner of a wall while victim moves in direction down hall. At 07:18, shooter returns past same wall and there is no blood on wall from a pointblank shot: https://files.catbox.moe/omhctd.GIF

• @07:11: Shooter shines his weapon light on a victim lying facedown on the floor. Note the complete lack of blood spatter, spray or pooling from a multiple GSW: https://files.catbox.moe/fvsvhk.GIF

• @07:23: Shooter returns to shooting previously shot people still in pile. Again, no blood consistent with over 100 5.56 rounds fired on 15-20 people against a white wall: https://files.catbox.moe/p62f7j.GIF

There are no signs of mass pooling from multiple GSW. All of the victims are against, or within 5’ of a wall when they are shot. This is also worth a read on debunking a snuff film: http://www.alexanderjason.com/analysis-of-a-snuff-video-is-it-real

In summary, there is nothing in the video to support that “victims” within this room and the hallway leading up to it were shot with a fatal weapon.

Please feel free to share this work. Spread the word. Fuck their feelings.

@vindicator @srayzie @molochhunter @think- @kyjane