Posts about other users are not allowed. You are welcome to post this in the comment section, but not as a submission post.

Of course!! And yes, we all have to stay vigilant!!! Thanks for the info!! I appreciate it!! Sometimes people latch onto a story and just want it to be true. You have to check and recheck. Patriots need to stick together!!

Maybe she is just too deep man, we all know that there are a lot of shills, and so she felt like she had a good source and because at times it seems like everyone is a shill attacking you it can be hard to tell the difference... So maybe she just let it all get to her and lashed out. Some people have a hard time putting their tails between their legs and admitting they were incorrect. Also some people have a hard time debating and I'll admit it can be frustrating when you feel you have provided good proof of something and people still won't open their eyes.

It's hard to sometimes admit you were wrong. I know I have to do it sometimes (very very rare 😂) but yeah sometimes. And it's not easy to flip the switch and say you know what you opened my eyes and I have changed my opinions. Some have a hard time with that.

What I'm saying is I don't know if I'm convinced she is a shill, just that maybe it's hard for her to admit she was wrong..

Peace bro

Thank you!! Stand Strong!! #WWG1WGA

A couple things, first this post itself is a rule violation in this subverse. No posts about specific users.

Secondly, @Godsangell flips out often on people calling them out for posting unsubstantiated information. It looks like to me they're a user here to push a narrative. Beyond that, they will often go back and edit their posts, sometimes with lengthy edits after you have responded to them, with no indication of what their edits were.

All in all, their actions are shill like. If they're not a shill, they sure act like one. What is the effective difference at that point?

I tried guiding and educating for weeks on constant stating pundit opinions as facts in the title of posts and jumping to the "Its happening" every other week posts. He just responded with personal attacks and then goes into how persecuted he is. Eventually, This made me double down and I started showing up at all his posts and talking to everyone up voting his stuff about how it was not fact and how false hope is dangerous to Q movement. More personal attacks. I attempted to clarify for him that all he had to do was present opinion as opinion and not fact and not attack me personally but attack my argument, and try to be a bit more discerning on sites to trust. After 2 months of this, he seems to be doing better at presenting opinions as opinions rather than facts. His posts are often shorter and more factual recently. I think he is working on it. But change on his part is slow and one can only wonder at what is going on for him that he struggles to post appropriately. I've never been like this with any other poster. But his posts felt dangerous to me, and I am protective of Q.

Like OP, I wondered for a while if he was a shill here to sabotage through false hope but after sometime now I don't think so. He just has different strengths than others and some deficits, like all of us. Some ppl can't handle even constructive criticism without attacking. I imagine on some subs across the internet his behavior would not stick out much. The Q crowd has less troll personalities and ppl tend to be more respectful. Godsangel may not have figured that out. GA brings energy and dedication. Hope he learns to not attack ppl who disagree with the way he posts or that he learns to present opinion as opinion. He is an asset underneath his poor choices.

2 days ago he/she posted an "outrageous" article about El Chappo giving the Clinton foundation $15mil. The listed source was an odd ball site, and someone griped about godsangel not being trustworthy.

2 days later, I see other, more credible news outlets picking up the story. So I would rule out troll. Probably just gambles on odd sources more than the average poster. I don't have a problem with it.

Something disguised as a patriot for sure. I'm just not sure what yet.

Preach brother, preach!

Q said beware of who you follow....

s/he posts too much with too much depth to be a troll/shill - s/he's a true believer - and its LOGIC that s/he needs and less reaction - s/he is pure emotion, albeit on the side of good/light - Q said stay UNITED - we cannot shun him/her - there must be a way but i'm not a psychologist

We all make mistakes, but a wise person will admit such, and seek to apologize if things got heated, IMO. That said, I always thought GodsAngell jumped the gun on conclusions, and offered false hope, often. (Besides the irritating all caps!!). Thought the username a bit prideful as well. If she/he/ze/zim is a shill, it is the right time to flake out, as all the others are freaking, and exposing themselves. Either some of our fellow VOAT Patriots are missing does of Prozac, or they are DS assets. (Off topic, I was shocked to see UK Bloke Awoke on the naughty list, I always liked him, and didn't see any flaking). All of the trees are "Fruiting", only some are just nutz!! :)

I watched the exposed godsangell she posted the same answer and I made fun of her. No response. I’ll go find it and repost. She’s a bot shill or niggerfaggot.

https://catbox.moe/c/t4b49k :

https://files.catbox.moe/5jmwvk.png :

This has been an automated message.

Isn't that Edie?