goatboy1127 ago

Hey guys, there is something I need help with. I've never understood how "FISA bring down the house" refers to the House of Representatives. What does the House have to do with FISA applications? Those are submitted by the DOJ/FBI. Unless certain members of Congress have had FISA warrants sworn out against them? Is that a possibility?

GodsAngell ago

I think the "bring down the House" refers to "The House of Cards".....playing off that horrible netflix series about how our gov't was run by psychopathic thugs....and it all (the Truth) turned out to be WORSE than the netflix series!

Revodude1 ago

My take is that in 30 days Boom. Followed by a Boom at the 45 day mark. Followed by a Boom at the 60 and 90 day marks. Keeping the pressure on and controlling the narrative for at least 4 months straight. Not sure when the clock starts; the 9th or the 1st (backing up 9 days) or the 18th (going forward 9 days). I am leaning toward the 18th, since it is the Monday after the clock runs out for a deal on the 15th.
As to the hops: My guess is that they ran spy information on the Trump campaign, etc. through each of the 4 other countries in 5 eyes so as to mask their trail.

numina18 ago

Complex and intricate, military planning at its finest. I just am watching. Don't need to understand everything, but excited to see something coming soon!!

redtoe_skipper ago

Your focus is on when. Q is focused on what.

redtoe_skipper ago

thank you for your efforts.

Placeholder. When you compare your view to what Q considers placeholder, there is a glaring difference. You are looking at specific people. Q is looking at specific productions. See Q 2481 - 2489

Comparing the " plan" to the countdown, you will find it is about objects being delivered.

[Placeholder - Indictments Tracking > Civ]

[Placeholder - Indictments Tracking > Non_Civ]

[Placeholder - SC rulings re: challenges re: Civ Non_Civ]

[Placeholder - SC rulings re: USA v Def appeals]

[Placeholder - FVEY_pub]

[Placeholder - FISA_pub]

[Placeholder - Acts of Treason + support Articles]

[Placeholder - Foreign Acts_pub]

[Placeholder - Branch termination(s)]

[Placeholder - Leak(s)]

[Placeholder - DECLAS GEN_pub]

[Placeholder - SPEC_C_pub]

[Placeholder - OIG Report & Findings]

[Placeholder - OIG report > FBI, DOJ, & Media Coll]

[Placeholder - OIG report > Exe B_ABCs & Media Coll]

[Placeholder - OIG report > Foreign ASST_D1]

[Placeholder - OIG report > Foreign_Insert(s)_ORec & Info Diss]

[Placeholder - OIG report > FISA Abuse DIR_INDIR_Source_DIS]

[Placeholder - OIG report > Umbrella SPY & Targeting]

[Placeholder - OIG report > OTR_C_]

2681 fits right in there.

corrbrick ago

UK/AUS narrative shift re: in_country spy campaign v. POTUS (hops 1 to 2; 2 to 3; 3 to 4; 4 to target)

Would the hops here refer to a series of FISA hops from the person under surveillance to those he communicates with? If, as I think, FISA only allows two hops that would mean hops 3 & 4 to the real target don't quite fit in. Anyone know the precise definition and limits of a hop?

GodsAngell ago

Yes, this thought occurred to me to, I just didn't know how to word it. This is good.

angelCole ago

Yes, that's it, kind of the 6 degrees of separation.

Spec1al1interest ago

Maybe the 3 & 4 hops were carried out by UK and Australia to circumvent the legal limits of FISA?

maga1234 ago

I think hop 1 is the "target" of the application, e.g. Carter Page. Then hop 2 is anyone that target talks with directly. Hop 3 is anyone that hop 1 or 2 directly communicates with, and hop 4 is anyone that 1,2, or 3 communicates with. So you can be pretty far removed from the person for whom you got the warrant and still spy on them (e.g. Trump).

RiiDERinthestorm ago

If you knew they’d know. Relax

M2Q2 ago

right?

Bushpilot ago

This whole post makes more sense to read from bottom to top. We are at T-30 and counting.

Fishdo169 ago

I think by OIG that Q may be referring to the ICOIG .... there’s something not right over there and hasn’t been for a while... that was underlined in the recent IC hearings and POTUS tweets as well as that evidence from some individuals whose answers to the committee helped push the democrats narrative and one guy in particular who was falling over himself to give the democrats the answers they wanted.. his name escapes me but his voice sticks in my mind as he had one of those camp sounds that people used to use to impersonate or play a part of a ‘is he or isn’t he’ character in 70s and 80s shows on TV...

Double_D ago

I'm still confused re: if RR is dirty, then RM is dirty and if RR is clean, RM is clean. If RM was designed to collect evidence on the DS, that would make him "clean" but it seems RR is still being referred to as a roadblock (dirty). Am I missing something?

Spec1al1interest ago

Well is it explicit that RR will be fired? Maybe he will resign because his work is done? Honestly don’t know where he sits white vs black hot but if he’s controlled could it not be that his purpose ends when SC ends?? If he was placed as a means to oversee, monitor or chaperone the whole situation when the Declas is imminent he’d be surplus?

Double_D ago

Maybe not explicitly, but in the last drop, 2681, one line refers to removing the "blockade" via the scaramucci method (which I think refers to Whitaker and RR in this case) then the next line is RR removal as it relates to oversight of mueller.

Why would they need Whitaker to come in and pull a scaramucci to remove RR, if RR is knowingly playing a "part"?

Spec1al1interest ago

Maybe Whitaker is cleaning others out and is part of the optics for the show? I mean if RR is piggy in the middle if there was no attempt to rein him in or counter him by potus wouldn’t that ring alarm bells with the swamp?

Double_D ago

Definitely a plausible theory from where I sit. Would be next level, for sure.

wealthword ago

It would simply mean they were controlled, not clean.

Play their roles as scripted, improvisation allow, but must maintain correct dialogue and scene progression.

Double_D ago

Yeah, I get the whole "gray hat by means of coercion" idea but I guess I was under the impression that either both of them are controlled or neither one of them is. If Mueller was "Desinged to" collect the goods on the DS the whole time, in theory, that would mean RR was also playing his gray hat role the whole time as well. If that were the case, why would Whitaker need to come in and take oversight of Mueller away from him? I realize, in the overall archof their lives, RR and RM aren't "clean", so maybe that was what Q was implying when connecting them in the "If RR is dirty..." drops; not necessarily in regards to this Op? See what I mean? A little confusing.

wealthword ago

They ARE both dirty.

The timing of the control is essential.

Their full control came when Sessions was ousted and the NEW AG forced the SCOPE to be collusion.

Any and all rabbit trails RR and RM were pursuing were dumped, and in my opinion deemed "fruit of a poisonous tree".

The information that they obtained CAN be used for prosecutors not tied to this specific special counsel.

They are opposition and were targets of Trump and the Republicans.

They are still dirty, the reports and final submission has to pass through the "cleaning" by the scope document. Thus their script didn't come into play until the the final few scenes of their section of the Movie.

What makes a good movie? Great Actors!

How to you make average actor portray a great and convincing role?

Change the script at the last moment with a contrary outcomes so the actors are genuinely shocked when the bomb goes off!

Zadim ago

Just think of the 90 as when you have to mail in your last 5 years of taxes then the 90 days will fly by like a week

3ra_3xtrana ago

https://files.catbox.moe/4gmf3c.png Read Between The Lines RBG

PearlyWhiteGates ago

Notorious RBG is on the way out? No report on why her lung cancers were called Malignant. No report on her health post surgery. I wish her the best, but she is a 3 time cancer victim.

GodsAngell ago

Can you hand on until Feb 15???

ThreeFourSevenOne ago

Uh... what's happening on February 15th? I am completely lost.

Q-sent-me ago

.gov shuts down again, because dems won't give wall funding.

GodsAngell ago

AND, Trump then declares a state of National Emergency, and Invokes Special Powers. Anything can happen at that stage. Remember this is ALL planned. Trump already has the money for the wall, per Q, and the wall is already being built, so there has to be ANOTHER reason why Trump wants to shut down the gov't and invoke special powers. I'm hoping, of course, it will mean the declas, which might cause riots, followed by martial law and the round ups. Could get messy or bumpy, so buckle up and stay tuned!

Q-sent-me ago

Eliminate SES and other deadwood positions.

UK_Bloke_Awoke ago

or maybe 30 days...

M2Q2 ago

correct... 30 days to declas.

DammitMan ago

Maybe 90. That’s still a blink of an eye in government time.

wealthword ago

[-30] Event one 30 days out out from mission initiation.

[-45] Event two 45 days out from mission initiation.

[-60] Event three 60 days out from mission initiation.

[-90] Event four 90 days out from mission initiation.

UK_Bloke_Awoke ago

Yes Yes Yes

That makes very good sense..

Excellent spot...

AlphabeticalAnon ago

Atomized_Individual ago

More BS to feast on

DammitMan ago

Munch munch munch. Yum yum yum

UK_Bloke_Awoke ago

For you it might be 'Crow' 🤫

DTX400 ago

Maybe giving us a 90 day countdown? I think the placeholders are active and it's a GO. Time to do more homework and prep work. WWG1WGA

M2Q2 ago

30 day... read it bottom to top not top to bottom ie: T minus not T plus.

DTX400 ago

You would be correct, sir.

Semlow ago

Or maybe the countdown lapses today? It's 90 days from posting the last placeholders.

derram ago

insideDC ago

(+) = hold . T-? And holding . Hold must be lifted to proceed with countdown from that timestamp

4 place holders at top [ ] . Indicate multiple launches

Watch film of a launch and see what happens when a (+) appears on large countdown clock . Time stalls (+) is not a normal (T-?) hold . Nothing proceeds until hold is cleared

(+) = adds time to launch sequence

Weather for instance . A predictable but UNCONTROLLABLE Variable

PygmyGoat ago

(+) usually means the mission is in progress post-launch. T+10 means 10 minutes into the mission.

https://www.quora.com/How-do-space-shuttles-launch