You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

awaymay45 ago

The first time you posted this, you asked for corrections with evidence. I gave you a detailed, sourced response, informing you that the 70k sealed indictment claim was bogus, yet you still include it.

The mass resignation claim is bogus as well.

You are spreading bad information. Just pointing that out... again. shrugs

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2925556/15686645

Red-Pill-NOW ago

Whats the point of asking for edits IF I MUST INCLUDE EVERY ONE GIVEN TO ME? I looked into your argument and found in the preponderance of your claims based on the sources provided by you not enough to discredit the original assertion. Both sides make a claim, neither has sufficient evidence to (absolutely) prove or disprove, hence the disclaimer I added and no more. I went with sheer volume of increase as a deciding factor. It's now over 73k, after over 1k came off last week in one day. This coincides with's Q's latest post citing state-level GJ's opened across the country. If you can give me something more conclusive I'f love to see it. That said, I'll invite you to sedate your OCD on this with the nearly 15 OTHER points made on the list as evidence SOMETHING MAY BE HAPPENING....? BUT I suppose you will dispute those observances as well, because IF THEY ARE REALLY HAPPENING WE WOULD NEED SEALED INDICTMENTS IN ORDER TO CORROBORATE, wouldn't we....

awaymay45 ago

You said you couldn't make a counter argument to the rebuttal I made. Generally that means the rebuttal is correct... and it is.

It is a provable fact that there aren't 70k sealed indictments. If you have supposedly tracked it on Pacer.gov, then show me one single sealed indictment off of that website. You can't, because pacer doesn't identify the contents of sealed documents.

Show your source that says 6k resignations is proof of 'unprecedented turnover'. You can't because it doesn't exist. No one has ever tracked resignations before, except for US CEO's, and it's only showing about a 5% increase over 2014.

I'm not dumb, I know where I am at, so I know that you are going to cling to those bogus claims as long as possible, no matter what. No biggie.

For the benefit of anyone reading this, here are two articles. The first explains why there aren't 70k sealed indictments, and why there is no proof that anything unusual is happening in the court system.

The second shows the exact people that started the claim, and shows how their ignorance of the terminology caused the sealed indictment buzz to go viral, even though it was false. It also shows how they intentionally misrepresented the data, to trick people that dont do research into thinking something unusual is happening.

https://wmerthon6.wixsite.com/website-1/home/comprehensive-analysis-of-the-50k-sealed-indictment-claim

https://wmerthon6.wixsite.com/website-1/home/who-started-the-60k-sealed-indictment-claim

Doc_Hollidae ago

Interesting articles, you clearly put a lot of time and energy into researching them. Why though? You're clearly not going to sway many minds in this subvoat, don't you feel like you're banging your head against the wall?

awaymay45 ago

I dont post on voat much. Every now and then I will put it out there, just so people can see it. Every now and then, I get some positive feedback from it here.

I was more active with it before the midterms and first of the year. Once those milestones passed and the mass arrests didn't happen, I figure that the people that still believe in them are in it for the long haul, and not much will change their minds, except the passage of time.

Doc_Hollidae ago

I very much want to believe. Just the same, your articles really are interesting and definitely food for thought. I hope you're wrong, but I appreciate you bringing other ideas to the table.

awaymay45 ago

Just to be clear, I'm not wrong about what I discussed... it's objective, verifiable data, and there really is no ambiguity about the legitimacy of the 70k sealed indictments number. It's not accurate.

In fact, the person that maintains the spreadsheet of the Qanon research team, recently started analyzing additional data, and estimated that there are currently only around 2k sealed indictments in the system. I dont really have a problem with that number... my issue would be that I still dont think that 2k is unusual.

That being said, 70k indictments aren't needed for a big splash, 1k would do the trick if they are for the right people, and there certainly could be 1k+ sealed indictments currently in the system.

The thing to remember is that there is no 'proof' that anything unusual is taking place... it's strictly based on faith/hope. In other words, it's still 'possible' that a large number of arrests will happen on high profile targets... there's just no 'proof' of it.

Personally, I dont believe it will happen. Time will tell.

Thanks for taking the time to read the articles.

Doc_Hollidae ago

The thing to remember is that there is no 'proof' that anything unusual is taking place... it's strictly based on faith/hope. In other words, it's still 'possible' that a large number of arrests will happen on high profile targets... there's just no 'proof' of it.

There's absolutely no argument on that from me.

Truth be told, 1 single sealed indictment could make a huge splash if, as you say, it was the right person. I hope it happens. Whether it does or not, who knows?

Red-Pill-NOW ago

Okay thanks! Anything else wrong with the list...?