You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SyntacticReality ago

Let's assume for a moment that DEW exist, what physical properties would this weapon need to have in order to be responsible for the alleged damage?

Microwaves can't heat plastic, but neither can stones, and metal can't be heated easily as well. For microwaves to work, they need a liquid medium, such as water in a piece of meat. Or water in a tree?

but you say that trees are not affected, so they probably won't be microwaves.

Possibly laser beams? A laser can heat objects, whether something starts to burn depends proportionally on the energy supplied, if a material can distribute the supplied energy faster than the laser can supply it, the object will not burn! This applies to all objects, including trees and especially plastic, but you claim it was not as affected as stone, metal and other materials that conduct heat well. Ok now let's assume that it's magically possible with DEW to set something on fire, how much energy would this weapon take to, say, set a car or house on fire?

To heat 1 liter of water from 0° to 100° takes 1kwH. now let's convert that to a house, and then to all houses and all cars, and everything you think was affected, and now my question, where do you store this amount of energy for a single DEW.

DawnPendraig ago

DEWs exist. They even boasted about them on the news in 2017.

I believe the lasers combined with the barium etc from chemtrails creates a plasma that burns at super high temps and won't be easy to put out.

Have you seen this?

Fires started by Direct Energy Weapons aka DEWs most of the time too with laser precision.

FoxNews 2017 boasting power of DEWs w/ CA Fires link video https://youtu.be/-cT-E-zXLlI

https://www.wired.com/2008/08/will-new-laser/

Lockhead Martin https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/directed-energy.html

House cut in half CA fires https://youtu.be/rEqaeNWkSDg

Backoftheqanon ago

All good points and questions none of which I can answer as I ain't a rocket scientist or a microwave/laser developer And I m definitely not Nikola Tesla. What I do know is these fires are questionable same as all the MSM BULLSHIT we are fed daily.

SyntacticReality ago

I ain't a rocket scientist or a microwave/laser developer

You don't have to be!

That's all basic physics school knowledge!

DWE are impossible!

Backoftheqanon ago

Lockheed Martin would appear to disagree with you.

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/directed-energy.html

SyntacticReality ago

where do they disagree with me?

I know very well what possibilities there are today, and if you take a look at Lockheed Martin's article, you will see very quickly that this laser does not have the corresponding properties that you would assign to the DEW. For example:

A 30 kw laser for a ridiculously tiny hole over several seconds in a motor hood, scale it up to the damage you say a DEW will do. The laser only works at a relatively short distance against small targets, approximately 1 mile.

The weapon doesn't exist in the form you say it does, it's physically impossible.

Can you make fire with a laser? Yes of course you can! but these fires will have all the characteristics of a normal forest fire that may have been deliberately set.

Backoftheqanon ago

Believe what you want. That website says DEW s exist which you said was impossible. You really think they are gonna advertise their full weapon itinerary on a public domain? They only get the big guns out when the high rollers are at the table with their wallets open.

SyntacticReality ago

No, I said that DEW are not possible with the properties you want them to have, that's a big difference.

I do not believe!

I know! again a big difference.

You cannot fuck physics, there is no free lunch.