DankOrganism ago

The further down this road we go, the harder it is to have any doubt that this is being orchestrated with military efficiency. I can't wait to watch the documentaries about this time in the future.

magavoices ago

It's going exactly as Q predicted.

You can't break up Twitter and Google with an antitrust suit if they aren't abusing their power. Q team gave them enough rope to hang themselves. Short term effect is we lose a little free speech in the interim. Long term effect is internet bill of rights.

bamadeplorable420 ago

got it.

CMajor ago

Why another new board (again). You a mod there or something? Why would it be isolated there and by whom? And if someone could do such a thing, why would that board be spared?

magavoices ago

Why another new board (again).

/v/GreatAwakening is the original Voat Q sub that existed long before bannings started happening.

I'm not a mod there (easy to verify). It is simply better than the incompetent shit that's going on in /v/theawakening.

For instance, you have zero CCP, so you can't submit a new thread. You never will be able to under the rules the mods from this sub set up as. They're incompetent.

d-_-bored-_-b ago

Dude sweeeet, "Full Transparency", fuck yea!

Promnite-toilet-baby ago

good reality check. the call to prepare for 8chan is also pretty solid advice. hopefully, people do not wait until it is too late.

Elbower_of_Quants ago

8chan? a basement stairs into an old over-rated video store after 11:30 pm...

ChristusRetter ago

At some point we may not have a choice. When you are at war a lot of conveniences go away. If we are fighting for survival, we will all be forced to put on our big boy pants and deal with stuff that we don't like. No criticism intended of anyone posting.

GranimalSnake ago

This is a quality post. Good shit.

AperionPatriot ago

He does occasionally hide tidbits in his posts. I actually found one.. in post 1990, he uses the phrase "Shall We Play A Game" not new, he's used it before, but he capitalized all the letters. If you searched those capital letters in google with quotes, it lead you to an old forum that had some information about a human trafficking cult an anon was trying to expose (it still exists today and has crept into the US). Now the result leads you to facebook (go figure), but I still have the forum thread that it lead me to... https://whyweprotest.net/threads/nma-random-chit-chat-off-topic-posts-moved-here.66542/page-53

Triceratography ago

That's not a reference to Global Thermonuclear Warfare?

AperionPatriot ago

Totes is almost assuredly. Just in this case he somehow a specific search query related to it only turned up one result. Kind of like how his trip codes have turned up curiously relevant reading material on google books. Coincidence? Maybe.

DamnLiquor ago

Learning all of Q's abbreviations would be a great start, but people are too lazy and want spoon feedings daily.

Keep these worthless bastards away from me while I am fighting to the death for my freedoms.

ThesePeopleAreStupid ago

Bro not everyone has as much free time as you to research and dig. You'd rather coming home from work at 7 still be tuning into CNN?

Triceratography ago

There's literally no reason to write like that. If he's real, and YOU know about him, you think the government he claims to be fighting doesn't?

It's a psychology tactic to make you more engaged. To make you feel like you are invested because you solved the riddle, and that you have secret knowledge others do not. And say he's real, to what end would he give you that knowledge? It wouldn't help you, nor him, nor anyone.

elitch2 ago

Yep. All it takes is a couple tweets and these poor misguided fucks think they're doing something positive by sitting on their hands.

Q is a LARP.

GlendonHawke ago

Yeah because LARPS have access to stacks of one of a kind Intelligence photos lmao nice try shill

elitch2 ago

https://www.talkenglish.com/grammar/grammar.aspx

Learn how to write the language, retard.

GlendonHawke ago

Lmao THAT’S your rebuttal it’s obvious you are an intellectual giant let me kowtow before your display of superiority....just kidding you’re obviously a liberal shill because like them you resort to attacking a personal attribute of the person who you disagree with because you are in fact too ignorant and or stupid to back up your claim have a nice day faggot

elitch2 ago

You just called me a liberal?

Go back where you came from. We're all full up here.

ThesePeopleAreStupid ago

Maybe you shouldn't be calling others retard. Seems hypocritical.

elitch2 ago

Maybe you should fuck off back to your safe space, faggot.

ThesePeopleAreStupid ago

Nah I'm good. I'm just saying maybe be a bit more self aware. Ya know?

elitch2 ago

Trust the plan!

Faggots, faggots everywhere...

Xyz4u ago

Thanks I was fucking confused and you came around and made total sense. What is your IQ, probably genius the way you break things down!

magavoices ago

We, as Q followers, have 1 purpose. We meme and instruct friends/family/acquaintances that everything is ok when the perp walks of high level political/hollywood figures happens so people don't freak out and flop the stock market / panic.

It's done that way because

  1. it allows Q to lead us in the direction of truth without violating national security laws

  2. we've already demonstrated our propensity to spread truth and meme, teaching people (as we helped Trump win in the first place)

  3. it creates intrigue and spreads like wildfire while bypassing the mockingbird MSM's filter, or as you like to put it, "It's a psychology tactic to make you more engaged."

We don't need to help Q in any other way. There's no riddle we have to solve on his behalf, he already knows it all.

Triceratography ago

Why would anyone panic over that unless they were involved? Nobody likes politicians, and people who care about actors probably don't hold large amounts of stock.

The Q thing is missing one key, the thing that would make it real, falsifiability. It's missing some other things too, like a sensible risk-reward ratio to divulging supposedly secret information.

If you're running a campaign and some people are already helping you, it's really a waste to spend ANY extra resources on them beyond some thank yous. You wouldn't even consider a gamble like revealing your plans.

None of that behavior squares with the 4D chess idea. We're talking about people who smash their phones with hammers. It wouldn't be smart to give them any hint at all they need to destroy evidence. Watching this Q stuff reminds me of how the gender cult on the other side holds conflicting ideals simultaneously.

All I want to know is this: In 6 years, if none of this stuff has come true, what will you say about Q then? I have to ask now because in the past I've found it very hard to get a response from other people making silly predictions after their deadline has passed.

magavoices ago

All I want to know is this: In 6 years, if none of this stuff has come true, what will you say about Q then?

First, who gives a fuck what I think. Why would it even matter to you, unless its your job to persuade me against Q.

For instance, take Flat Earthers. They're wrong, obviously. But it's a big movement. You won't see me seeking out flat earther forums to try to persuade them that the earth is round. Let them be stupid, who cares? It doesn't affect me at all.

So here you are, apparently belonging to the cult of "Thou shalt not believe in Q." Why? But to answer your question, if there aren't major happenings (red wave in November for beginners) mixed in with a mass of suicides/capital punishments (either hidden or public) roudups to Gitmo by say March of 2019, I'll be reevaluating circumstances.

None of that behavior squares with the 4D chess idea.

Arresting is the easy part. America accepting it is the hard part. The MSM must continue to be free. If Trump bitchslaps the deep state and Hillary and Obama, half the country will be shocked and the MSM will only portray one side. Trump has to crush the MSM first, to prevent that, and he's doing a damn good job of it.

Trump has gone full Sun Tzu on the deep state and MSM, they look like fools and traitors. Democrats are self destructing. By the time Trump pulls off the arrests, the right will be cheering him and the left will begrudgingly accept that foul play happened. The stock market won't crash and civil unrest will be minimized.

Triceratography ago

I don't care what a flat earther thinks, and I don't think most of them are for real. The ones who are probably have some mental illness.

I do care what you think, because I don't think you're joking or insane. Most of the Q people seem like otherwise normal people who got fooled, and I'm interested how the trick worked so well.

I wouldn't say I'm in a cult of disbelief, just that a falsifiable proof with evidence has not been presented. Likewise, if someone presented me proof the earth is flat, I'd accept it, but it would need to be real proof, not a bible with "firmament" highlighted.

magavoices ago

Sit back, relax. Q is a self-nullifying conspiracy theory if it's not true.

We were promised a red wave in November, if it doesn't happen then Q isn't real.

There's a massive amount of sealed indictments. Like, over 50k now. These must be opened relatively soon (no later than March 2019 I'd say). If it doesn't happen, or if it's not revealed to be devastating to the swamp, then Q isn't real.

Sessions is a good guy in Q lore. If Trump ever fires him, Q isn't real.

Wray is a good guy in Q lore. If Trump ever fires him, Q isn't real.

Kansas (Huber) is a good guy, if ever fired then Q isn't real.

Horowitz is a good guy, if ever fired then Q isn't real.

The whole Q scene is coming to a head after nearly a year now. Big things are happening very shortly. If the status quo continues then Q isn't real.

There's no need to debunk Q, Q will debunk itself if the above mentioned situations (and many more) are proven otherwise. If I had to bet money though, Q is absolutely legitimate. Even now as we speak here at Voat, our boot from Reddit was predicted. So is our boot from Twitter, Facebook and Youtube. It's all been predicted, as well as the anti-trust case Sessions is now bringing.

I'm 100% fully open to the idea that Q may not be real. It's just that everything has rung true through today. On the flip side, I'm sure you're not even entertaining the thought that Q is legitimate. You'll find you're living in an echo chamber bubble, the same one that had Hillary at 98+% chance of winning.

Aletheiaphile ago

Not OP but at that point I would expect it would all be a move by Trump to gain favor as he systematically put his friends in power.

I would have a very hard time explaining a lot of the drops such as the post time deltas, photos taken on his flight route, fire truck with Q on it when no other firetruck has that, posting that flag ahead of time just recently, etc. They need access to a fuckton of info.

Would have to able to explain those some other way than 'Trump is in on it.' I don't have good alternatives at this point.

Could be Trump fucking with us. Could be a hacker who happened to get a lot of info. Could be CIA psyop. It's just so structured that it has to at minimum be planned extensively.

One thought is that 'meme magic' has developed enough fake explanatory power to explain away anything. There is after all an army of anons gathering evidence. So the most impressive looking stuff sticks and hangs around. This is difficult to reconcile with how consistently Q operates. He's made what, 2000 posts? At least 5% of those have something that feels like strong evidence that he has a lot of info on what is going on and connections. Which is a stronger hit rate than I would expect for pure confirmation bias.

Triceratography ago

5% is probably fairly low for confirmation bias. A good cold reader throws out way fewer guesses than that.

Have you seen that website that generates "deep wisdom" nonsense phrases modeled after that Chopra guy? If I had to guess on Q I'd go with either a government chatbot or just a group of 3-4 college students.

The chatbot scenario is a bit scary, since some of these guys are talking about "dying fighting." That's part of why it interests me, the other is a sort of curiosity about how people in cults deal with their predictions failing.

Aletheiaphile ago

When I say 5% being strong evidence I mean the kind of shit I would be very hard pressed to even come up with an alternate explanation. I'd say another 20-30% of it is strong but maybe coincidence. Then the rest of it is structural, confusing, or not as important.

Government-chatbot idea adds complexity with little gain. Requires all the preparation of a human/organization, but doesn't answer who is doing it. We're trying to first figure out if one could cause anons to come up with this level of conspiracy from noise. So the chatbot idea stands separate from the idea it is from the government or any other specific organization for the moment.

Since like, either it has access to only public info, or some degree of classified. If it is exclusively public info and noise, then how do we explain things like the firetruck and deltas? The truck could be Trump capitalizing on a conspiracy. Pretty sure some of the deltas were called in advance. Would be surprised if none of the deltas actually were. the DOITQ in that trump tweet title was approaching too much to be pure coincidence. Still kind of plausible to find something like that by chance given there are what, 50k trump tweets? At least at that point Trump's team was fucking with stuff.