Keep in mind: Thie video of the plane hitting the north tower at 8:46 was shown LATER, not live, so they had time to cgi the plane in.
Talking about 'live': There is exactly and only ONE video which was shown live. The one where 'Pinochios nose' comes out on the other side of the south tower. This ONE video was shown by ALL channels 'live'. They varied the coloration and screen cut between channels to make it appear to be different videos at first glance.
There. Were. No. Planes.
Or how do you think a plastic & aluminium plane does a cut out of it's plane shape through massive steel beams?
How better to get people ready to accept a giant conspiracy than to expose the biggest one in modern times to the people who have little trust in the official story as it is.
If you can truly believe the truth about 9/11... you're getting ready for the rest of it.
can anyone explain why this video could not be simply edited to show no plane? theres a huge compilation of videos if you search on youtube of the 2nd impact. the ID card in the beginning definitely needs to be investigated if anything.
What the fuck is this shit about? Doesnt wake anyone up, just makes the brainwashed idiots fall deeper into their slumber. Doesnt state any facts about the buildings being destroyed in a controlled demolition, or that it was done for the Greater Israel plan.
some troll operation by a bunch of loser fags with no date friday night. so they zero in on a major event that they were too young to remember and shill it with no fucking perspective about how serious it was. They did not know life before 911, they don't know what we lost. Fucking childish fucking kids.
Thats just the backside of the tower being blown out. This is disinfo to discredit you. 911 inside job they swapped the planes, markings on the actual recordings dont match a known commercial marking, if you fake it you dont leave that kind of mistake in your footage.
Ive heard this alot, all of this seems more like a distraction than anything, about if the planes were real, cgi, or holograms. The underlying fact is those buildings were brought down by explosives in a controlled demolition.
It's out there everywhere. All you have to do is open your eyes. Look at all of the official videos. You will notice that the planes are literally indestructible. They don't crumple at all, they don't break. The wings don't fall off, the tail doesn't fall off. They just disappear into a slit. If a plane lands slightly hard it's tail can fall off. A bird hitting a plane does more damage than the supposed planes hitting the WTC budings. My proof is the actual siad to be real videos you have been watching since day one but just didn't pay close enough attention to. Planes aren't stronger than steel buildings. The outside of the buildings had a steel mesh around them. They weren't just glass... They were build like a screen door... Except made of steel.
Dude I am not stronger than a bullet. A plane is like a tin can and the buildings had a steel mesh on the outside. So yeah you you shot a bullet (the wtc) at a plane (me) it would destroy me. It's not the velocity that matters so much or which object is moving, what matters is the strength of the objects and which is stronger. In this case the building is WAY stronger than the plane so the plane would crumple. Take a paper airplane and throw it into a wall as fast as you can, there may be a very small dent in the wall but the plane itself is going to be all crumpled up. You're trying to use false science to explain something. More speed, more damage to the plane. Not less.....
You are focusing on only one material. In your example, there is only one item the airplane is composed of: Paper.
What if I agree with you, and suggested it mainly wasn’t high velocity aluminum which went through the building? Was there allegedly anything else the plane was composed of?
How about copper? Some glass? Plastic? Steel? Think of the cockpit.
How about people?
How about water?
Do you understand how water is described as ‘incompressible’?
How about one of those carts the flight attendants push that is full of liquid. How much damage would that do to your wall at high velocity?
Look, your instinct is right. There is something off about what happened that day. But focusing on ‘then planes weren’t real’ and ‘energy weapons’ bull is just a distraction from the far less sensational truth.
I never said shit about energy weapons. Don't put words into my mouth. I said there weren't planes. Look at the videos. If the planes have stronger materials is irrelluvent. Those materials aren't what you see in the videos hitting the building. You see the plane hitting it. And there is 0 damage being done to the plane. Quite trying to play verbal magic tricks and either take a look at it and realize there's no damage done to the plane, or admit your mind is closed. Doesn't matter what's inside the plane the plane itself hit and didn't have damage. Idk about these energy weapons. But I tend to believe there was explosives that caused the damage to the buildings. But I know what absolutely didn't, the plane didn't because the plane is fake and that's 100 percent cleear if you open your eyes and realize it's not possible.
Those materials aren't what you see in the videos hitting the building. You see the plane hitting it.
Yes, the plane which is full of people and the materials. Frankly, you sound a bit close-minded about this. I’m not trying to play any tricks, just to have a discussion.
holy crap man look at the videos. The plane wasn't damaged was in perfect condition as it simply disappeared along a plane. A slit if you will. That shits so impossible doesn't take much to realize it's a mind fuck. Take another look at any of the official videos and you won't see so much as a hail ding happening to the plane. To the outside of the plane for that matter. Wtf does the inside contents of it have to do with anything. So you're saying you take an empty car and slam it into a wall, then take the same car and put people in it and somehow it's going to make the outside of the car indestructable.? That's crazy talk man...
Ok, I’m beginning to understand what you’re trying to get across: The rear of the plane doesn’t appear to suffer damage from the front impact. Is that accurate?
Yeah not to say there isnt something dirty about the "official" story, but the video of the plane hitting didnt look immediately like CGI to an untrained eye.
Jesus... I can't imagine what that must have been like. I'll never forget seeing the 2nd one hit. I thought it was a replay, at first (it was west coast time and I was a tired as hell high schooler) but then the news anchor started just... yelling in disbelief.
There's two versions of the footage showing the same exact side of the building, one with a plane and one without (where it frankly just looks like a botched demolition job), you try to figure out which one is real
Weel, I just watched it and within 5 minutes, YT removed it for "violating blah blah blah graphic and or violent content blh blah blah....the attacks are continuing...
Is it possible they can recognize an identical video being spammed across several channels?? Of all the things they could use their resources for... Smh.
Fucking shills man. If planes weren't used to hit the building why the fuck did one crash in PA? Why didn't they just demo the capital or whatever and 'cgi' the plane afterwards like the other locations?
something is wrong with this site---I commented a few times--but my same comments come up 3-4 times--triplets---I didn't post the same message over and over--and ALL the comments are downvoted hardcore!!!--except the retarded comments..
He's worth researching. Not just a dead reddit ceo. Heroic young man and death by suicide. But who trusts the "suicide" verdict of anybody anymore? Do you read up on him. He matters.
Gotta admit. I dont see any signs of anything going into the building. It just starts blowing outward. That glitch just before the explosion is troublesome.
NOPE --I don't think so--people are convinced of everyone saying they saw a plane--cause maybe the first one was hit with a plane---but not the second tower-----it's just a sheep mentality---
I just realized something, why are there no videos at ALL of the plane flying in the sky over the city, or heading directly towards a camera holder? Why only focus on the building if you see and/or hear a huge ass plane incoming? I also thought it was weird, on September 11 2001, that so many people had video recorded everything... this was before cell phones became commonplace...
It makes sense that planes hit the buildings since the deep state used a technique to distract the people at NORAD from being able to stop a hijacking that day.
4 seperate simulated hijackings were organised on 9/11. This confused the people at NORAD which made it difficult for them to respond to a real hijacking.
So either the planes were actually hijacked by the deep state or the planes were remotely controlled by deep state. They could've controlled the real planes or had planes of their own.
I think NORAD was able to shoot down one of the planes. That plane could've been for wtc7.
What? Why not focus on all of the above points. So you're saying exclude specific evidence? That's disinformation tactic dude. Oh ignore that and just look at this stuff. Sure those are all valid points, BUT SO IS THIS.
Yes ignore that dumb video. You won't be able to convince anyone with it. I have seen that footage a while ago when I looked into the whole idea of there being no planes.
Planes definitely hit the building. You look crazy when you say no planes hit the building. That's not a good look for the community that is trying to show people the inconsistencies of 911.
Either one of the two videos is fake. All it shows is that someone faked one of the videos. It's unrealistic for the CIA to fake every video and add a plane to it.
It would be much easier to fly one of their own planes or remotely control the actual planes. This is the more likely scenario considering they organised 4 different simulated hijackings for NORAD. When NORAD was confused about what is going on, its easier to get past their defenses and fly planes into the buildings.
Dude no planes hit the building and it is easy to prove. Look at any video of the planes hitting the building. There is no damage to the planes at all. They don't even crumple a tiny bit. The buildings had a steel mesh all around them. The planes would have crumpled the wings would have fallen off, as would the tail have. Instead they just disappeared into a slit. Not fucking possible. A bird has done more damage to a plane than that. Planes tails fall off when then just land a bit too hard. Look with your own eyes, and I have the official real blueprints of the WTC if you don't somehow believe that they have a steel mesh surrounding them...
You can see for yourself what happens when a plane is smashed into a concrete wall. It completely disintegrates on impact. Planes are built of light weight aluminium, it's not very strong at all and will completely crumple on impact. The buildings weren't solid walls either, they had gaps for the windows so a lot of the plane would've gone inside the building.
The odd thing about the wtc impacts is that the plane wings managed to break the steel columns. It's possible that the columns were weakened before impact so it could break them.
The idea that the planes are fake isn't a very good one. They were caught live on camera and all the video footage perfectly aligns with each other to show the path of the plane. It would be too much effort to gather all the footage and then implant fake planes. It's too risky since you can't guarantee that you will get all of the footage.
So you admit the planes would crumple on impact. Now go back to any video of the event and realize they didn't. And the videos were prepared ahead of time. Why do you think ddb was reporting the WTC collapse 15 or so minutes before it occurred because of foreknowledge. And they clearly didn't get all copies and implant fake planes this very thread proves that. We have two videos one with and one without the plane, which looks faker? The one with the plane. No damage done to the plane. The wings go into a slit really? Not possible dude.... No planes.. probably was explosives that made the outline of a plane...
It's ONE video. If there were no planes then I would expect there to be multiple videos out there that didn't have a plane in them.
I don't think it was explosives in the sense you are thinking. I think the columns were weakened before the plane hit which allowed the plane to knock out the columns.
You can see that there is something glowing hot at the edges of the columns. There were reports of explosions before the plane hit. I think they were detonated slightly before the impact which allowed the plane to make such a large hole.
I really don't think they went and prepared all of these videos ahead of time. That's too much effort and it would be difficult to get it all to match up. Then you have the problem of creating realistic explosions. You would also have the problem of no eye witnesses seeing planes. Too much could go wrong when you fake the videos.
It's a much more likely scenario that they actually got some planes to hit the buildings. There are multiple ways they could've done it.
They could've got some people to hijack the real planes. Remotely controlled the real planes, or remotely controlled their own planes.
These scenarios also make more sense since they distracted NORAD with false hijackings. They wouldn't need to put so much effort into distracting NORAD if they weren't going to fly real planes.
But you're using conjecture over physical video. Quit over thinking and actually look at the video of the planes that shits impossible. Some people think the planes we're projected holographs. Idk what I do know is those planes aren't real.
The whole holographic thing is probably disinformation to make the community look crazy. There is no such technology that can do that.
You're putting too much trust into this one video. There are better sources of evidence that it was a controlled demolition. Try not to get sucked in by all the crazy ideas.
The planes aren't that important to show that it was a controlled demolition anyway. I recommend watching these 3 videos by an architect that goes over the physics of buildings.
You're again putting words in my mouth. It sure was controlled demolition, just with no planes. You won't fucking look at the evidence of course. And there actually is proof of technology for holographs, but that's completely irrelluvent. How they did with is irrellivent to the fact the planes in the videos simply aren't real. And I'm not putting anything in to "this video" I'm saying ALL OF THE OFFICIAL VIDEOS showing planes are clearly faked. Quit arguing because of your cognative dissonance and take a look and see for yourself.
This explains how the only 3 verified to be live shots of the towers actually do not show a plane at all. All three are news chopper video that aired live.
It also explains how easy it is to fake the videos and points out mistakes made in the child placement of them
But really all you have to do is have a somewhat small brain and watch the official videos released that show a plane to tell it is a very poor cgi mock up.
I understand fine the physics of building collapse, not sure why you're sending me those links.. they prove nothing on topic here.
People went and found their cameras after the first impact. You will notice that there are very few recordings of the first impact.
As to videoing the plane flying low over the city I can say that I lived right below a flight path near a local airport the plants were fairly low, but they were flying slow at that point. I would never really have had time to get out my phone and record by the time the plane was over my head and gone. Before smart phones...
Here is a video from the first impact that gives some idea what it would be like to see the plane fly over:
https://youtu.be/h3shmfKOZ9g
Looks like the video clip is looping to show that no plane hit the tower. It looks like the explosion originates inside the building. I compared it to another video showing the second plane impact at nearly the same angle and you can clearly see the plan I must say this is very interesting. If there was no real plane hitting the tower then how did they fake it so it to make it look like there was a real plane for most videos but not for this one? Very interesting!!!
I figured it out on my own, you didn't give context that this was supposed to be an original without a plane and the video was already removed so i had no idea wtf you were talking about, i get it now
Comparing the above with this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=RC3tzgrNuMc, makes it much more easier for an untrained eye to see, how a silhouette could be added to the footage.
All stations were broadcasting the manipulated version, so no wonder news has gone total fake ever since.
Can you make one at quarter speed (or whatever slow speed), cut where the explosion is in the top right corner but doesn't leave the the picture yet?
(This one is a bit too fast to register with slowbrains and a bit too much rollercoater to watch for long, no complaints, I know absolutely nothing about editing, just a remark)
I'm not understanding exactly what you are saying you have. A video of the impact but with no planes? (Sorry, I can't reference the video in OP because it's gone).
Thank you!! It's such a short snippet, it's really, really hard to get good context. So, this is the backside of the building being blown out by impact?
I'm glad you are here!!---I'v know no plane hit the tower for over 10 years now--just watch the video CNN released --their magical video--shows the "plane" dissapearing into the towers hahah
some kind of psyop. Real planes hit those towers, whether they brought them down by themselves different story. Use your head, thousands of witnesses and multiiple videos. There is even an fdny training vid they were filming downtown when they turned the camera up bc there was such a loud low flying fast moving plane. caught part of the first impact. Real impacts from real planes. All other fuckery yes, but real hits. Any one who promotes holographic planes is disinfo fag.
hmmmm-but the planes disappear into the building---that's not normal---so they were obviously made out of light weight material--either way--the TRUTH is about to drop!
why is that hard to believe. aluminum frame, 300 mph. steel beams what, 12-18 in wide with 24-36 inch windows. they pulverized against the steel and or smashed thought the window. the towers were huge, the video is from thousand of feet away, think you'd see the crumbs falling off the building at that distance?
Plane went through the building. You are seeing the explosion as it exited the other side.
Here's 18 videos of it from different angles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YLm3pkAiJQ
But there are 18 separate videos in the video I linked, showing a plane hitting the 2nd tower. Now, it may have been reinforced. It may have been loaded with explosives. But it looks like a fucking plane hitting the 2nd tower to me .... and it looks like it in all 18 videos.
NO PLANE hit that tower---Do you see any plane---I've been telling people this for the last 10 years---the ONE video that was "GIVEN" to the fakestream media---IS TOTAL BULLSHIT---watch that other vid---the plane DISSAPEARS INTO THE BLOOD TOWERS!!! computer generated vid
Don't sure what to look for in the smoke trail. But what I do see is that the left wing disappears before impact and those engine nacelles are just too skinny/not there.
Maybe muddying the waters for some... current event/future event? I didn't really notice much besides a bit more detail showing what looks to be the engines bursting through the tower a frame or two before the explosion... it doesn't really seem that enlightening but perhaps I'm missing something.
if you actually paid attention you would notice theres not a plane in the video. if you paid attention to investigations post 9/11 you would know that its LITERALLY impossible for a plane to have flown into the building. 100% truth that's irrefutable.
ask the plane fags. you can push turbines beyond safe operating levels. stands to reason suicide pilots (or rc pilots) would overburn the fans. those 757 could have done 500 knots or you are lying about the radar reports, 500 is well below the speed of sound. Stop the disinfo or at least learn when you are discussing things outside your element. clearly you have no technical aviation training plane fag wannabe dumb nigger.
Pilot and aerospace engineer...I agree. Those planes can do 500 knots at 30,000 feet where the density is a fraction of sea level. Flutter or some other aeroelasticity would have ripped the tail off if you overspeed at sea level.
Do you know what kind of equipment would have been clocking their speed? The "radar from the airport or something nearby" part is quite vague and if the "510 knots" is above top speed, doesn't that rule out that the radar "or something" clocked them at 510 when the previous poster specifically said "clocked at top speed"? Sorry, I know this isn't your job to educate me but any insight would be greatly appreciated!
The Pentagon was definitely a missile. The engines usually leave big holes since they are made of titanium and are very tough. The engines passed through the South Tower, for instance, yet I see no engine holes in pictures of the Pentagon.
Not a conspiracy expert, but ask me about JFK sometime.
I always wondered if these fucks planted something like thermite - if the sprinkler system went on/was triggered (REEEE!) the water would have helped "jet fuel melt steel beams", damnit (｡ì _ í｡)
If you saw all the smoke coming from the towers you know that the fire was starved for oxygen and wasn't burning very hot. Some sort of oxidizer or explosive had to have compromised the structure.
My son wants to be an aerospace engineer so bad! I need the 411 on how to help keep him on the path to his dream career.
And this is the first time I am even hearing this not being possible based on speed impossibility alone. Convenient how it was not brought up in the hearings.
Model rockets and model planes. If your kid can design a rocket that flies he's 2 years ahead of some kid who watched his phone his whole childhood when he gets to college.
Well, 1/2 ain't bad. Will start looking into designing a rocket that actually flies.
And he doesn't have a phone but spends a lot of time doing digital mapping and making blueprints of random things.
i have. My father was building manager in the village on 911. When they heard a plane hit the TT they went to the roof with a pair of binoculars to look at the fire. Shortly after a second plane flew over his head at high speed and low altitude. My father said it reminded him of artillery shells going over his head in the army. i told him that was because of how fast it was moving, the sharp pitch change from the doppler effect when it passes over your head. He saw and heard the aircraft and tracked it with binoculars as it hit the second tower. There is no doubt real aircraft hit those towers.
a few years later at an unrelated political rally at a night club a couple of so called '911 truthers' showed up to work the crowd. one of them with crazy ass eyes came up to me and told me they were holograms. this was 2005. They all looked like drugged out losers. Real honest people who wanted a better investigation have been infiltrated by hired shills promoting the most absurd ideas about the attacks. Its been going on so long, clearly there is a cover up and part of that is to promote stupid theories to discredit those that ask real questions.
ProjectROYGBIV ago
To Kill A Mockingbird 911 DARPA LOCKHEED MARTIN RELEASE Qanon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ie_An382Fk …
WWG1WWGA #MAGA #Qarmy #Qanon #Trump
Fateswebb ago
Video has been removed
LilBrattyMkr ago
The plane has been shopped out, not shopped in. Putting the two videos side by side you can tell.
RealAaronSwartz ago
Get a grip.
nullifyNWO ago
Keep in mind: Thie video of the plane hitting the north tower at 8:46 was shown LATER, not live, so they had time to cgi the plane in.
Talking about 'live': There is exactly and only ONE video which was shown live. The one where 'Pinochios nose' comes out on the other side of the south tower. This ONE video was shown by ALL channels 'live'. They varied the coloration and screen cut between channels to make it appear to be different videos at first glance.
There. Were. No. Planes.
Or how do you think a plastic & aluminium plane does a cut out of it's plane shape through massive steel beams?
RealAaronSwartz ago
Remember guys, trust your eyes https://imgoat.com/uploads/d5e957f297/146747.gif
Aprioned ago
That didn't look like a plane, that looked like a missile shot.
RealAaronSwartz ago
Tesla weapons...
DJB ago
Look into BUAP--boeing uninterruptible auto pilot
RealAaronSwartz ago
https://imgoat.com/uploads/d5e957f297/146747.gif
DJB ago
heh i just saw that video after i made my reply. idk yet but either way its bullshit. is it dark black or is it light green well it is shit
RealAaronSwartz ago
https://imgoat.com/uploads/d5e957f297/146747.gif
This is The Awakening
CrocodileRevolver ago
And just like that Im at a lose for words. If this is true it so sad.
EmergencyBroadcast ago
No planes - they are in a panic, everyone sees through the lies
CentipedeRex ago
I just realized this must be "the video" the Q was talking about a month or two ago that everyone assumed would be a damning HRC video.
GranimalSnake ago
How better to get people ready to accept a giant conspiracy than to expose the biggest one in modern times to the people who have little trust in the official story as it is.
If you can truly believe the truth about 9/11... you're getting ready for the rest of it.
stinkydogfart ago
Its being deleted across jewtube as fast as it can be uploaded, all for a LARP? hmmm, intredasting.
bitterwon ago
Well YouTube took it down. They want this movement silenced
Eckolaker ago
Don't fall for Disinfo campaigns. The towers were rigged for demolition(possibly during construction), and planes definitely hit the towers.
This is already known fact.
ProofMR2 ago
can anyone explain why this video could not be simply edited to show no plane? theres a huge compilation of videos if you search on youtube of the 2nd impact. the ID card in the beginning definitely needs to be investigated if anything.
ImPhilippe ago
What the fuck is this shit about? Doesnt wake anyone up, just makes the brainwashed idiots fall deeper into their slumber. Doesnt state any facts about the buildings being destroyed in a controlled demolition, or that it was done for the Greater Israel plan.
somethingaweful308 ago
some troll operation by a bunch of loser fags with no date friday night. so they zero in on a major event that they were too young to remember and shill it with no fucking perspective about how serious it was. They did not know life before 911, they don't know what we lost. Fucking childish fucking kids.
Gorillion ago
WhiteDragonMage ago
Thanks downloaded and shared
LostandFound ago
Thats just the backside of the tower being blown out. This is disinfo to discredit you. 911 inside job they swapped the planes, markings on the actual recordings dont match a known commercial marking, if you fake it you dont leave that kind of mistake in your footage.
Be wary
CentipedeRex ago
Use this shot to compare/contrast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC3tzgrNuMc
dw2020 ago
Wake up, there were no planes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc
GuantanamObama ago
Nauseating if true
ImPhilippe ago
Ive heard this alot, all of this seems more like a distraction than anything, about if the planes were real, cgi, or holograms. The underlying fact is those buildings were brought down by explosives in a controlled demolition.
EmergencyBroadcast ago
No advanced weapon systems which point us directly to the perpetrators
CentipedeRex ago
I got a copy and sent to bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/aDJbWJZ1hNzJ/
FriendofAbe ago
Good shit
new4now ago
censored by youtube, Gone
nullifyNWO ago
How fast it got banned tells you that its real.
new4now ago
The War is on
I think it may be a good time to go back to radio
better yet, Trump needs to bust a move fast
he knows whats going on
he knows Twiitter and Facebook next
I know people on FB having trouble logging in or other troubles.
these are friends who have been given time outs because of what they said
even religious statements getting deleted
I dont do Twitter, but I am trying to watch whats going on in FB
Is he waiting on Kavanaugh?
Still think an interest in Ham Radios is the way to go for future CYA
DustinFromVancouver ago
EXACTLY---It was banned less than 20 minutes after the original post.
somethingaweful308 ago
yeah of course, adds Streisand effect to the shill op. yt bans the controlled op faggotry to help promote it. they are not that dumb.
GranimalSnake ago
Certainly a good tactic to build credibility.
somethingaweful308 ago
or they just remove their own vid and lock comments... ha. even simpler. occams razor. THEY took it down man!
1223344556677888 ago
Battle stations ready https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON2YVIF1znk vv
GlendonHawke ago
Already removed
131313 ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGEvn789FOg
StrangerThanFiction- ago
Youtube removed the video
k1ace ago
A plane hit the tower. Or at least something that looked like a plane. I watched it from a window not on TV.
EmergencyBroadcast ago
NO PLANE IN THAT VIDEO
Fateswebb ago
No planes at all on 9/11 it was all a mind fuck easily proven too
heygeorge ago
Please share your proof of no planes with us!
Fateswebb ago
It's out there everywhere. All you have to do is open your eyes. Look at all of the official videos. You will notice that the planes are literally indestructible. They don't crumple at all, they don't break. The wings don't fall off, the tail doesn't fall off. They just disappear into a slit. If a plane lands slightly hard it's tail can fall off. A bird hitting a plane does more damage than the supposed planes hitting the WTC budings. My proof is the actual siad to be real videos you have been watching since day one but just didn't pay close enough attention to. Planes aren't stronger than steel buildings. The outside of the buildings had a steel mesh around them. They weren't just glass... They were build like a screen door... Except made of steel.
heygeorge ago
How fast is a plane traveling in this scenario?
Fateswebb ago
https://youtu.be/ExwU6FScZ94
Why would it matter dude. Certainly a lot less fast than the wtc "impact"
heygeorge ago
If I threw a bullet at you or I shot it out of a gun, do you think that would make a difference in the impact?
Fateswebb ago
Dude I am not stronger than a bullet. A plane is like a tin can and the buildings had a steel mesh on the outside. So yeah you you shot a bullet (the wtc) at a plane (me) it would destroy me. It's not the velocity that matters so much or which object is moving, what matters is the strength of the objects and which is stronger. In this case the building is WAY stronger than the plane so the plane would crumple. Take a paper airplane and throw it into a wall as fast as you can, there may be a very small dent in the wall but the plane itself is going to be all crumpled up. You're trying to use false science to explain something. More speed, more damage to the plane. Not less.....
heygeorge ago
You are focusing on only one material. In your example, there is only one item the airplane is composed of: Paper.
What if I agree with you, and suggested it mainly wasn’t high velocity aluminum which went through the building? Was there allegedly anything else the plane was composed of?
How about copper? Some glass? Plastic? Steel? Think of the cockpit.
How about people?
How about water?
Do you understand how water is described as ‘incompressible’?
How about one of those carts the flight attendants push that is full of liquid. How much damage would that do to your wall at high velocity?
Look, your instinct is right. There is something off about what happened that day. But focusing on ‘then planes weren’t real’ and ‘energy weapons’ bull is just a distraction from the far less sensational truth.
Fateswebb ago
I never said shit about energy weapons. Don't put words into my mouth. I said there weren't planes. Look at the videos. If the planes have stronger materials is irrelluvent. Those materials aren't what you see in the videos hitting the building. You see the plane hitting it. And there is 0 damage being done to the plane. Quite trying to play verbal magic tricks and either take a look at it and realize there's no damage done to the plane, or admit your mind is closed. Doesn't matter what's inside the plane the plane itself hit and didn't have damage. Idk about these energy weapons. But I tend to believe there was explosives that caused the damage to the buildings. But I know what absolutely didn't, the plane didn't because the plane is fake and that's 100 percent cleear if you open your eyes and realize it's not possible.
heygeorge ago
Yes, the plane which is full of people and the materials. Frankly, you sound a bit close-minded about this. I’m not trying to play any tricks, just to have a discussion.
What do you mean that the plane wasn’t damaged?
Fateswebb ago
holy crap man look at the videos. The plane wasn't damaged was in perfect condition as it simply disappeared along a plane. A slit if you will. That shits so impossible doesn't take much to realize it's a mind fuck. Take another look at any of the official videos and you won't see so much as a hail ding happening to the plane. To the outside of the plane for that matter. Wtf does the inside contents of it have to do with anything. So you're saying you take an empty car and slam it into a wall, then take the same car and put people in it and somehow it's going to make the outside of the car indestructable.? That's crazy talk man...
heygeorge ago
Ok, I’m beginning to understand what you’re trying to get across: The rear of the plane doesn’t appear to suffer damage from the front impact. Is that accurate?
Tdschef247 ago
Yeah not to say there isnt something dirty about the "official" story, but the video of the plane hitting didnt look immediately like CGI to an untrained eye.
VitaloStarbucky ago
Yeah this video is retarded. It's just the momentum of the plane travelling through the opposite side of the building that it hit.
SphynxtheRiddler ago
And, for what it's worth, my ex boyfriend lived in New York at the time and was not far. He has always maintained witnessing the same.
SphynxtheRiddler ago
Jesus... I can't imagine what that must have been like. I'll never forget seeing the 2nd one hit. I thought it was a replay, at first (it was west coast time and I was a tired as hell high schooler) but then the news anchor started just... yelling in disbelief.
an_angrier_dave ago
already deleted. Somebody didn't like it.
1223344556677888 ago
Battle stations ready https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON2YVIF1znk
crownedfive ago
video just removed for "graphic content" !!!!!!
1223344556677888 ago
Battle stations ready https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON2YVIF1znk ...
LooshCollector ago
very strange since theres like 100s of videos on youtube of 9/11
somethingaweful308 ago
they promote it by banning it. reverse psychology. military grade shillery
GuantanamObama ago
Streisand Effect
1223344556677888 ago
Battle stations ready https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON2YVIF1znk ...
GranimalSnake ago
Here's footage showing the plane in the hit... look at the angles. https://youtu.be/q7aFfiZB6Ik
DustinFromVancouver ago
THE VIDEO WAS JUST ERASED FROM YOUTUBE----====DIRECTLY OVER THE TARGET
RealAaronSwartz ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWM4_SmpCS0 ...
DustinFromVancouver ago
WOW thanks---Im sending this to my uncle again!
BillyBobBoJangles ago
Mirror?
RealAaronSwartz ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWM4_SmpCS0
IWishIWasFoxMulder ago
Make a BitChute mirror
the_art_collector ago
I feel like the reason the video starts at the impact is because it took less effort to remove the plane.
RealAaronSwartz ago
Come on man, the gig is up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGzKG-SSsP4
BillyBobBoJangles ago
This is fucking stupid. You are stupid. Low effort trolling.
crownedfive ago
is this not just the other side of the towers, meaning we wouldn't see the plane anyways because it was entering from behind? (lol)
Aprioned ago
There's two versions of the footage showing the same exact side of the building, one with a plane and one without (where it frankly just looks like a botched demolition job), you try to figure out which one is real
GranimalSnake ago
What do you think? https://youtu.be/q7aFfiZB6Ik
cryptex ago
The side we are looking at is the side they added the plane in on the fake news. You can compare the videos.
GranimalSnake ago
Yes... this appears to be legitimate. There should be a plane there... and nope.
Politiskep ago
Aaaand censored
SamuelHyde ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWM4_SmpCS0
Politiskep ago
REEEEEEEEEE NOT HOOKTUBE D:<<<
just kidding. Thanks friendo.
CentipedeRex ago
It was removed! ANyone have a backup! I'm trying to figure out how to get it out of my cache.
pixelkitteh ago
https://www.onlinevideoconverter.com/video-converter
set format to mp4 and download EVERYTHING that's important :) back it all up onto external hard drives, cloud accounts etc...
SiriusTheLune ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Plt3IRq-66s
DustinFromVancouver ago
I know WTF!! BUT people say it was put up on at least 10 different sites, at the exact same time.
SphynxtheRiddler ago
Well, that's not suspiciously coordinated or anything... what a crock.
DustinFromVancouver ago
Ya, no shit! man---the truth is going to be an avalanche--and I think it really just started TODAY--get out the popcorn!!
Blacksmith21 ago
Or this
Blacksmith21 ago
I think the video is gone
RealAaronSwartz ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WK4HHaNhcgU
Dantes_Lady ago
Weel, I just watched it and within 5 minutes, YT removed it for "violating blah blah blah graphic and or violent content blh blah blah....the attacks are continuing...
SiriusTheLune ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGEvn789FOg
SiriusTheLune ago
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2720868
SphynxtheRiddler ago
Is it possible they can recognize an identical video being spammed across several channels?? Of all the things they could use their resources for... Smh.
wooqy ago
Hope you downloaded it. Didn't last long.
CentipedeRex ago
REMOVED!!! Holy fuck!!
HighEnergyLife ago
Fucking shills man. If planes weren't used to hit the building why the fuck did one crash in PA? Why didn't they just demo the capital or whatever and 'cgi' the plane afterwards like the other locations?
wooqy ago
No plane there either. Here's a real crash site: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=malaysian+airlines+mh17+russian+photos&t=ffnt&iax=images&ia=images
70times7 ago
Who sais one crashed in PA?
HighEnergyLife ago
Why even bother making a story about it then
70times7 ago
Did you really just ask why would someone lie?
RealAaronSwartz ago
I'm Aaron Swartz. Why do you think I did all this?
CentipedeRex ago
Because this is a coordinated plan and all part of the great awakening.
RealAaronSwartz ago
Yes.
CentipedeRex ago
Wow...
DustinFromVancouver ago
something is wrong with this site---I commented a few times--but my same comments come up 3-4 times--triplets---I didn't post the same message over and over--and ALL the comments are downvoted hardcore!!!--except the retarded comments..
1223344556677888 ago
Battle stations ready https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON2YVIF1znk
DustinFromVancouver ago
Awesome!!
GranimalSnake ago
Thank you
RealAaronSwartz ago
Come on man...
einmal ago
Who's Aaron Swartz? I don't have the energy or inclination to search
somethingaweful308 ago
don't bother, faggot is dead
WTFChuck ago
He's worth researching. Not just a dead reddit ceo. Heroic young man and death by suicide. But who trusts the "suicide" verdict of anybody anymore? Do you read up on him. He matters.
GranimalSnake ago
All the above is accurate.
ProofMR2 ago
the dead reddit ceo
einmal ago
Ahhh, thanks. actually kind of funny now
realityisinsanity ago
https://www.perrotin.com/artists/Gelitin/33#biography The Gelitin group website
realityisinsanity ago
Their work has been on display at the historic Belvedere.
realityisinsanity ago
Pedo rituals most likely occurred there and probably still do.
realityisinsanity ago
https://www.gelitin.net/projects/
mickblueeyes ago
What the fuck did I just see?
realityisinsanity ago
Money laundering
realityisinsanity ago
They live in Vienna, Austria. They are still active.
realityisinsanity ago
Baumgasse 42/4 A - 1030 Vienna Austria
realityisinsanity ago
https://www.perrotin.com/artists/list Get digging on all these Satanists.
SukkhaMadiqqa ago
Gotta admit. I dont see any signs of anything going into the building. It just starts blowing outward. That glitch just before the explosion is troublesome.
GranimalSnake ago
Here is an angle with the plane in the footage. https://youtu.be/q7aFfiZB6Ik
ErrorHasNoRights ago
fake video
more of the disinfo psyops
cryptex ago
Definately real.
MidnightSphinxHack ago
https://youtu.be/qGEvn789FOg in case deleted again
VapidGopher ago
Use Hooktube.
RealAaronSwartz ago
I have the video where they added the plane.
Greydle ago
Was the plane shopped out?
DustinFromVancouver ago
NOPE --I don't think so--people are convinced of everyone saying they saw a plane--cause maybe the first one was hit with a plane---but not the second tower-----it's just a sheep mentality---
RealAaronSwartz ago
No plane hit the twin towers at any point.
Greydle ago
Help me. How do you know that? I watched both videos.
RealAaronSwartz ago
I know because I am working with an auditor of Lockheed Martin.
analyticalalligator ago
Then share it.
Edit: Never mind. here it is: https://youtu.be/RC3tzgrNuMc
the_art_collector ago
Hmm it let me download this one but not the one without the plane.
crownedfive ago
I just realized something, why are there no videos at ALL of the plane flying in the sky over the city, or heading directly towards a camera holder? Why only focus on the building if you see and/or hear a huge ass plane incoming? I also thought it was weird, on September 11 2001, that so many people had video recorded everything... this was before cell phones became commonplace...
Tiessa ago
Good points.
Laserchalk ago
Planes definitely hit the buildings.
It makes sense that planes hit the buildings since the deep state used a technique to distract the people at NORAD from being able to stop a hijacking that day.
4 seperate simulated hijackings were organised on 9/11. This confused the people at NORAD which made it difficult for them to respond to a real hijacking.
So either the planes were actually hijacked by the deep state or the planes were remotely controlled by deep state. They could've controlled the real planes or had planes of their own.
I think NORAD was able to shoot down one of the planes. That plane could've been for wtc7.
Fateswebb ago
There were no planes and it's easy as f to prove
Laserchalk ago
It's disinformation because now you believe completely stupid bullshit and aren't focusing on the hard evidence.
This video is not a reliable source.
Focus on the red/gray chips found in the dust that contain the same elements as thermite.
Focus on the symmetrical free fall acceleration of wtc 7 that is inconsistent with office fires.
Focus an the multiple war games conducted by NORAD which lead to confusion and the inability to take down hijacked planes.
Fateswebb ago
What? Why not focus on all of the above points. So you're saying exclude specific evidence? That's disinformation tactic dude. Oh ignore that and just look at this stuff. Sure those are all valid points, BUT SO IS THIS.
Laserchalk ago
Yes ignore that dumb video. You won't be able to convince anyone with it. I have seen that footage a while ago when I looked into the whole idea of there being no planes.
Planes definitely hit the building. You look crazy when you say no planes hit the building. That's not a good look for the community that is trying to show people the inconsistencies of 911.
Either one of the two videos is fake. All it shows is that someone faked one of the videos. It's unrealistic for the CIA to fake every video and add a plane to it.
It would be much easier to fly one of their own planes or remotely control the actual planes. This is the more likely scenario considering they organised 4 different simulated hijackings for NORAD. When NORAD was confused about what is going on, its easier to get past their defenses and fly planes into the buildings.
Fateswebb ago
Dude no planes hit the building and it is easy to prove. Look at any video of the planes hitting the building. There is no damage to the planes at all. They don't even crumple a tiny bit. The buildings had a steel mesh all around them. The planes would have crumpled the wings would have fallen off, as would the tail have. Instead they just disappeared into a slit. Not fucking possible. A bird has done more damage to a plane than that. Planes tails fall off when then just land a bit too hard. Look with your own eyes, and I have the official real blueprints of the WTC if you don't somehow believe that they have a steel mesh surrounding them...
Laserchalk ago
The whole idea is completely stupid.
You can see for yourself what happens when a plane is smashed into a concrete wall. It completely disintegrates on impact. Planes are built of light weight aluminium, it's not very strong at all and will completely crumple on impact. The buildings weren't solid walls either, they had gaps for the windows so a lot of the plane would've gone inside the building.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk
The odd thing about the wtc impacts is that the plane wings managed to break the steel columns. It's possible that the columns were weakened before impact so it could break them.
The idea that the planes are fake isn't a very good one. They were caught live on camera and all the video footage perfectly aligns with each other to show the path of the plane. It would be too much effort to gather all the footage and then implant fake planes. It's too risky since you can't guarantee that you will get all of the footage.
Fateswebb ago
So you admit the planes would crumple on impact. Now go back to any video of the event and realize they didn't. And the videos were prepared ahead of time. Why do you think ddb was reporting the WTC collapse 15 or so minutes before it occurred because of foreknowledge. And they clearly didn't get all copies and implant fake planes this very thread proves that. We have two videos one with and one without the plane, which looks faker? The one with the plane. No damage done to the plane. The wings go into a slit really? Not possible dude.... No planes.. probably was explosives that made the outline of a plane...
Laserchalk ago
It's ONE video. If there were no planes then I would expect there to be multiple videos out there that didn't have a plane in them.
I don't think it was explosives in the sense you are thinking. I think the columns were weakened before the plane hit which allowed the plane to knock out the columns.
You can see that there is something glowing hot at the edges of the columns. There were reports of explosions before the plane hit. I think they were detonated slightly before the impact which allowed the plane to make such a large hole.
I really don't think they went and prepared all of these videos ahead of time. That's too much effort and it would be difficult to get it all to match up. Then you have the problem of creating realistic explosions. You would also have the problem of no eye witnesses seeing planes. Too much could go wrong when you fake the videos.
It's a much more likely scenario that they actually got some planes to hit the buildings. There are multiple ways they could've done it.
They could've got some people to hijack the real planes. Remotely controlled the real planes, or remotely controlled their own planes.
These scenarios also make more sense since they distracted NORAD with false hijackings. They wouldn't need to put so much effort into distracting NORAD if they weren't going to fly real planes.
Fateswebb ago
But you're using conjecture over physical video. Quit over thinking and actually look at the video of the planes that shits impossible. Some people think the planes we're projected holographs. Idk what I do know is those planes aren't real.
Laserchalk ago
The whole holographic thing is probably disinformation to make the community look crazy. There is no such technology that can do that.
You're putting too much trust into this one video. There are better sources of evidence that it was a controlled demolition. Try not to get sucked in by all the crazy ideas.
The planes aren't that important to show that it was a controlled demolition anyway. I recommend watching these 3 videos by an architect that goes over the physics of buildings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbKGbjfkijY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOdU0rr8zLk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFQ_S-nwVd4
Fateswebb ago
You're again putting words in my mouth. It sure was controlled demolition, just with no planes. You won't fucking look at the evidence of course. And there actually is proof of technology for holographs, but that's completely irrelluvent. How they did with is irrellivent to the fact the planes in the videos simply aren't real. And I'm not putting anything in to "this video" I'm saying ALL OF THE OFFICIAL VIDEOS showing planes are clearly faked. Quit arguing because of your cognative dissonance and take a look and see for yourself.
https://youtu.be/Ckkag_-45BA
This explains how the only 3 verified to be live shots of the towers actually do not show a plane at all. All three are news chopper video that aired live.
https://youtu.be/2c5_g7UTuGM
It also explains how easy it is to fake the videos and points out mistakes made in the child placement of them
But really all you have to do is have a somewhat small brain and watch the official videos released that show a plane to tell it is a very poor cgi mock up.
I understand fine the physics of building collapse, not sure why you're sending me those links.. they prove nothing on topic here.
analyticalalligator ago
People went and found their cameras after the first impact. You will notice that there are very few recordings of the first impact.
As to videoing the plane flying low over the city I can say that I lived right below a flight path near a local airport the plants were fairly low, but they were flying slow at that point. I would never really have had time to get out my phone and record by the time the plane was over my head and gone. Before smart phones...
Here is a video from the first impact that gives some idea what it would be like to see the plane fly over: https://youtu.be/h3shmfKOZ9g
GlendonHawke ago
Makes me wonder if one could find a single person who actually seen the plane in the air
SamuelHyde ago
maybe he's a little busy dude, what do you think?
MidnightSphinxHack ago
https://youtu.be/qGEvn789FOg
in case any go down
danthi ago
Looks like the video clip is looping to show that no plane hit the tower. It looks like the explosion originates inside the building. I compared it to another video showing the second plane impact at nearly the same angle and you can clearly see the plan I must say this is very interesting. If there was no real plane hitting the tower then how did they fake it so it to make it look like there was a real plane for most videos but not for this one? Very interesting!!!
RealAaronSwartz ago
All in good time, I will be releasing everything. All media are complicit.
DustinFromVancouver ago
YEP! That's why there are hundreds of "Reporters" going to Gitmo!!!!
GranimalSnake ago
Godspeed
Futt_Buckinton ago
Inb4 concernfags say this is made in aftereffects. Jurassic Park has amazing cgi and that was 1993
DustinFromVancouver ago
https://911planeshoax.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/empty-holes.png?w=960&h=472
derram ago
https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=MBBdLMvo1eY :
This has been an automated message.
LurkMaster ago
It looks like the back side of the second impact. Note this vid at the :25 mark. https:// youtu.be/9eTzV7HvKHU?t=371 (remove the space)
Note the smoke direction of the first tower in OP vid. Compare with the second.
HighEnergyLife ago
Exactly, they know this but are still pushing it. Faggots.
RealAaronSwartz ago
I have the video where they added the plane, I will release that too.
chris ago
im lost here, what do you mean "they added the plane"?
RealAaronSwartz ago
https://imgoat.com/uploads/d5e957f297/146747.gif
this
chris ago
I figured it out on my own, you didn't give context that this was supposed to be an original without a plane and the video was already removed so i had no idea wtf you were talking about, i get it now
wooqy ago
A side-by-side would be really nice.
RealAaronSwartz ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGzKG-SSsP4
wooqy ago
Comparing the above with this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=RC3tzgrNuMc, makes it much more easier for an untrained eye to see, how a silhouette could be added to the footage.
All stations were broadcasting the manipulated version, so no wonder news has gone total fake ever since.
RealAaronSwartz ago
https://imgoat.com/uploads/d5e957f297/146747.gif
gif of the footage
wooqy ago
Can you make one at quarter speed (or whatever slow speed), cut where the explosion is in the top right corner but doesn't leave the the picture yet?
(This one is a bit too fast to register with slowbrains and a bit too much rollercoater to watch for long, no complaints, I know absolutely nothing about editing, just a remark)
RealAaronSwartz ago
Will do so.
SphynxtheRiddler ago
I'm not understanding exactly what you are saying you have. A video of the impact but with no planes? (Sorry, I can't reference the video in OP because it's gone).
MidnightSphinxHack ago
Here is the video: https://youtu.be/qGEvn789FOg
SphynxtheRiddler ago
Thank you!! It's such a short snippet, it's really, really hard to get good context. So, this is the backside of the building being blown out by impact?
MidnightSphinxHack ago
Nope https://youtu.be/RC3tzgrNuMc
DustinFromVancouver ago
I'm glad you are here!!---I'v know no plane hit the tower for over 10 years now--just watch the video CNN released --their magical video--shows the "plane" dissapearing into the towers hahah
somethingaweful308 ago
some kind of psyop. Real planes hit those towers, whether they brought them down by themselves different story. Use your head, thousands of witnesses and multiiple videos. There is even an fdny training vid they were filming downtown when they turned the camera up bc there was such a loud low flying fast moving plane. caught part of the first impact. Real impacts from real planes. All other fuckery yes, but real hits. Any one who promotes holographic planes is disinfo fag.
DustinFromVancouver ago
hmmmm-but the planes disappear into the building---that's not normal---so they were obviously made out of light weight material--either way--the TRUTH is about to drop!
somethingaweful308 ago
why is that hard to believe. aluminum frame, 300 mph. steel beams what, 12-18 in wide with 24-36 inch windows. they pulverized against the steel and or smashed thought the window. the towers were huge, the video is from thousand of feet away, think you'd see the crumbs falling off the building at that distance?
DustinFromVancouver ago
It still doesn't add up--I think we might all be surprised, of the actual 100% truth of 9/11
RealAaronSwartz ago
Glad you are here patriot.
DustinFromVancouver ago
We need 71,000 members to be hear----maybe in time..
GranimalSnake ago
Please do friend. The world is ready.
DustinFromVancouver ago
Are u awake??? NO PLANE HIT THAT TOWER---do you see a plane hahah my god!! geezus
reddituser1968 ago
Plane went through the building. You are seeing the explosion as it exited the other side.
Here's 18 videos of it from different angles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YLm3pkAiJQ
DustinFromVancouver ago
It shows jack shit--the second tower was never hit by a plane
reddituser1968 ago
I'm on your side. I think 911 was shady as hell.
But there are 18 separate videos in the video I linked, showing a plane hitting the 2nd tower. Now, it may have been reinforced. It may have been loaded with explosives. But it looks like a fucking plane hitting the 2nd tower to me .... and it looks like it in all 18 videos.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YLm3pkAiJQ&t=291s
You do a disservice to everybody when you post retarded, easily refuted bullshit like you just posted. Perhaps that is your actual purpose?
DustinFromVancouver ago
Eat shit u fucking faget
reddituser1968 ago
You are a disgrace. Where did you go to troll school? What a loser.
baileyaxel ago
Truth is EXPLOSIVE
DustinFromVancouver ago
NO PLANE hit that tower---Do you see any plane---I've been telling people this for the last 10 years---the ONE video that was "GIVEN" to the fakestream media---IS TOTAL BULLSHIT---watch that other vid---the plane DISSAPEARS INTO THE BLOOD TOWERS!!! computer generated vid
wooqy ago
....and it appeared to slice through and come out on the other side. Ummm, nope.
CentipedeRex ago
Here's the one we all saw. Look at the smoke trail. Same side. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC3tzgrNuMc
wooqy ago
Don't sure what to look for in the smoke trail. But what I do see is that the left wing disappears before impact and those engine nacelles are just too skinny/not there.
CryptoBard ago
Maybe muddying the waters for some... current event/future event? I didn't really notice much besides a bit more detail showing what looks to be the engines bursting through the tower a frame or two before the explosion... it doesn't really seem that enlightening but perhaps I'm missing something.
metatrontab ago
Nicely done Aaron.
SamuelHyde ago
no fucking way, aaron swartz?
GranimalSnake ago
Wtactualfuck
showbobandvagene ago
I dont get it? Its just a loop of the second plane hitting the twin tower?
care to expand on your title?
cryptex ago
There is no plane.
HighEnergyLife ago
Shilling or psych ops. Stay frosty
Blacksmith21 ago
All of the above: "Data mining seeks to include general pattern descriptions to characterize data understood".
Maladaptivenomore ago
Look again. It's a video of no planes hitting the second tower. You can see the puffs of smokes where the engines and nose should have entered.
gnuburger ago
I watched it live. I saw the plane fly into the building. This is bullshit.
cryptex ago
Shill.
gnuburger ago
moron
ProofMR2 ago
Have you heard of Project Blue Beam? if a child saw tupac down on stage at the superbowl a few years ago they could argue to death they saw it live.
RealAaronSwartz ago
They showed fake images. I will release a video about it. You have been put under mind control project mockingbird but it's about to end.
ProofMR2 ago
Seriously put up or shut up. Id say the same thing to a chick, tits or gtfo. don't be a tease
ProofMR2 ago
if you actually paid attention you would notice theres not a plane in the video. if you paid attention to investigations post 9/11 you would know that its LITERALLY impossible for a plane to have flown into the building. 100% truth that's irrefutable.
somethingaweful308 ago
ask the plane fags. you can push turbines beyond safe operating levels. stands to reason suicide pilots (or rc pilots) would overburn the fans. those 757 could have done 500 knots or you are lying about the radar reports, 500 is well below the speed of sound. Stop the disinfo or at least learn when you are discussing things outside your element. clearly you have no technical aviation training plane fag wannabe dumb nigger.
ProofMR2 ago
man that was about the worst half ass attempt at trolling. maybe next time faggot.
somethingaweful308 ago
eat a bag of dicks guy. the only stick you've been behind is the one you were reaching around to grab.
ProofMR2 ago
yawn
WhiteRonin ago
Nah, it was a reinforced jet airliner that shot rockets before impact.
I posted a video a while back to v/TheLight
ProofMR2 ago
yea either give me the direct link or im not going to look. im not sifting through all your content for it
WhiteRonin ago
I think this was it.
https://voat.co/v/TheLight/2704211
realopticsguy ago
Pilot and aerospace engineer...I agree. Those planes can do 500 knots at 30,000 feet where the density is a fraction of sea level. Flutter or some other aeroelasticity would have ripped the tail off if you overspeed at sea level.
SphynxtheRiddler ago
Do you know what kind of equipment would have been clocking their speed? The "radar from the airport or something nearby" part is quite vague and if the "510 knots" is above top speed, doesn't that rule out that the radar "or something" clocked them at 510 when the previous poster specifically said "clocked at top speed"? Sorry, I know this isn't your job to educate me but any insight would be greatly appreciated!
realopticsguy ago
Radar figures that out from the location change from various pings and or Doppler shift. You can usually ask ATC for your speed.
Ovrcmr ago
Just curious, my longtime opinion is cruise missile but unsure of the payload. Thoughts?
realopticsguy ago
The Pentagon was definitely a missile. The engines usually leave big holes since they are made of titanium and are very tough. The engines passed through the South Tower, for instance, yet I see no engine holes in pictures of the Pentagon.
Not a conspiracy expert, but ask me about JFK sometime.
sugarlief ago
I always wondered if these fucks planted something like thermite - if the sprinkler system went on/was triggered (REEEE!) the water would have helped "jet fuel melt steel beams", damnit (｡ì _ í｡)
realopticsguy ago
If you saw all the smoke coming from the towers you know that the fire was starved for oxygen and wasn't burning very hot. Some sort of oxidizer or explosive had to have compromised the structure.
realityisinsanity ago
The "crater" at Shanksville is a ravine that has been there forever.
WanderingTaurus ago
My son wants to be an aerospace engineer so bad! I need the 411 on how to help keep him on the path to his dream career.
And this is the first time I am even hearing this not being possible based on speed impossibility alone. Convenient how it was not brought up in the hearings.
WhyAserverWasBuilt ago
Lots of MATH and science! My niece ia an aerospace engineer. Has a master's in field.
realopticsguy ago
Model rockets and model planes. If your kid can design a rocket that flies he's 2 years ahead of some kid who watched his phone his whole childhood when he gets to college.
WanderingTaurus ago
Well, 1/2 ain't bad. Will start looking into designing a rocket that actually flies. And he doesn't have a phone but spends a lot of time doing digital mapping and making blueprints of random things.
realopticsguy ago
drafting is an important skill
SamuelHyde ago
Bingo - thank you
einmal ago
Interesting, hadn't heard this explanation before
somethingaweful308 ago
i have. My father was building manager in the village on 911. When they heard a plane hit the TT they went to the roof with a pair of binoculars to look at the fire. Shortly after a second plane flew over his head at high speed and low altitude. My father said it reminded him of artillery shells going over his head in the army. i told him that was because of how fast it was moving, the sharp pitch change from the doppler effect when it passes over your head. He saw and heard the aircraft and tracked it with binoculars as it hit the second tower. There is no doubt real aircraft hit those towers.
a few years later at an unrelated political rally at a night club a couple of so called '911 truthers' showed up to work the crowd. one of them with crazy ass eyes came up to me and told me they were holograms. this was 2005. They all looked like drugged out losers. Real honest people who wanted a better investigation have been infiltrated by hired shills promoting the most absurd ideas about the attacks. Its been going on so long, clearly there is a cover up and part of that is to promote stupid theories to discredit those that ask real questions.
middle-path ago
I work in aviation. This is the first time I've heard of this, but holy hell it rings true.
GranimalSnake ago
It looks like several ANON channels are uploading the same video?
I'm not sure what this is yet.
HighEnergyLife ago
Serious shilling on this, lots of faggotry involved. Stay frosty.
WanderingTaurus ago
At least I still learned something new (to me) from @ProofMR2 and @realopticsguy
Blacksmith21 ago
Full on assault coming soon. Prepare the memes. And the M855.
GranimalSnake ago
Yeah... I'm tracking. We'll see.
RealAaronSwartz ago
Whut? lol
GranimalSnake ago
I saw this posted via another channel, but a shorter clip.