Like all logical fallacies presented before this one; Your rhetorical question presume's 'Q' is real and has already been qualified against a broader set of real, observable facts. Which they have not.

Your rhetorical question presumes an answer before I actually answer. You Psyop yourselves with this shit. Before discussing the details, you should discuss the implication of the sentence itself.

This is a jewish tactic, often used on their less bright jews to get them lost in details. What's that jewish phrase again... when a jew makes another jew get stuck in details instead of staying focused on the big picture?

Yod? Yohd? Yota? Shit-head?

I can't remember all their micro-macro flubber speak tied with their psycho-semantic shit.

So sleepy...