You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Tb0n3 ago

I deny it because there is zero proof.

NoisyCricket ago

That can literally only mean you've never bothered to look.

Even Tallest Shill accidentally admitted that he knows the proofs and lies about it.

There are three groups of people.

  1. Those how have bothered to honestly research and come out understanding and believing. Or at least wanting to believe.

  2. Those who are ignorant and claim there is zero proof.

  3. Those who know, lie about it, and claim there is zero proof.

Tb0n3 ago

Post ONE proof. Every single time you guys REEEEEE about some shit Q got right it's so far from proof it's hilarious.

NoisyCricket ago

NK

There's your proof. Which means you've never once bothered to look, or you've looked and you are a liar. Thusly your very post is confirming my post above. You are a #2 or a #3.

Please stop your REEEEing about REEEing which never existed. Which again, is a commonly lie told by people like you. You're REEEEing.... Isn't it terrible when you provide the proof that you, yourself, are either ignorant and/or a liar?

Seriously, it's not hard. Either you care about the truth and will bother no one any longer until you've made an effort, at which point you won't be asking idiotic questions, or you'll be converted because you know the truth and Q is real.

Tb0n3 ago

lol Q's thanks were AFTER the fucking news reported on it.

NoisyCricket ago

Factually false. Q reported on it when MSM was sabre rattling about impending war.

Nice lie.

Tb0n3 ago

I'm not spending the effort for it again, but when it came up I did the research myself and found news articles dated prior to Q's post.

NoisyCricket ago

Thank you for confirming you are a #3. A professional shill. A liar. A scumbag. A traitor.

Tb0n3 ago

I'm not some autist who keeps links to everything to post on voat to feel superior. Look it up faggot.

NoisyCricket ago

LOL. Says the guy who clearly refuses to provide anything while demanding his master educate him.

RRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeing....... Your tears.... they won't stop. LOL...

nowcomesthepain ago

@NoisyCricket is right, you're a shill motherfucker. You pussies are desperate.. That article says nothing about a deal being made. In the bolded it says the opposite. I can't wait until you fags get doxxed.

Top South Korean negotiators left for the United States Thursday to brief their American counterparts on the outcome of their historic meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un earlier this week. South Korean National Security Office Head Chung Eui-yong revealed few details of the trip as he boarded a plane at Seoul's Incheon Airport for a brief two-day visit to Washington.

"The most urgent issue is to make sure the United States and North Korea will engage in talks," Chung said, as he departed with National Intelligence Service chief Suh Hoon.

A White House official told CNN that Chung will meet US national security adviser Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster at the White House Thursday afternoon. Afterward, the South Korean delegation is expected to brief other senior officials from the US government. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is out of the country on his first official trip to sub-Saharan Africa.

The two diplomats recently returned to South Korea from an unprecedented meeting with North Korea's Kim in Pyongyang, believed to be the leader's first face-to-face talks with South Korean officials since he took power in 2011.

The meeting led to plans for an April summit when Kim will meet South Korean President Moon Jae-in at the demilitarized zone separating the two countries.

On Tuesday, Chung announced the North Koreans were prepared to discuss denuclearization with the US as long as their security was assured, prompting tentative optimism in Washington.

"I think that their statement and the statements coming out of South Korea and North Korea have been very positive," US President Donald Trump said Tuesday. "I think that they are sincere. ... I hope they're sincere. We're going to soon find out."

Robert Kelly, associate professor of political science at Pusan National University, told CNN the level of enthusiasm for talks in the United States could depend on how the South Korean government sells them to the US president.

"We're a year and a half into US President Trump's administration and it's pretty clear Trump wants the publicity and the wins," he said. "If the South Korea and North Korea deal can be marketed to him in those terms, I think he'll be on board."

If any North Korean talks with the United States do take place, there's a possibility they could be handled by an outside expert, an administration official told CNN Wednesday, due to the depleted nature of the US State Department.

The top diplomat dealing with North Korea, Joseph Yun, is set to retire from his role at the State Department this week. Additionally, the US currently has no ambassador in Seoul, and no nominees have been announced.

Officials told CNN the administration was reaching outside the government to find an expert how could help handle the North Korean regime, alongside Tillerson. But State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert on February 27 dismissed claims the US lacked diplomatic experience in the region.

Mattis: 'Optimistic' on North Korea

US Secretary of Defense Mattis has said he was "cautiously optimistic" about the offer of talks from North Korea. However he noted there had been "optimism before" about negotiations which had ultimately failed.

"We're going to have to watch actions and see if they match words," he told reporters Wednesday during a visit by the Estonian Minister of Defense to the Pentagon. It is not the first time North Korea has volunteered to hold talks on its nuclear program. In both 1994 and 2005

Pyongyang said it would give up its nuclear arsenal, only to go back on its promise each time.

Kelly said it would take "real" concessions from the North Koreans, involving human rights or their nuclear program, to make him believe they were serious.

"Then Moon can take that to the Americans and the conservatives back in the South, that's what I'm waiting for," he said. "The rest is process, what matters is that there are substantial concessions."

Despite the possibility of talks, two defense officials told CNN the United States has no plans to hold off on its annual drills with the South Korea military.

The exercises, postponed for a month by the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, will begin on March 31, the officials told CNN.

Every year when the drills are held it provokes a strong response from the North Korean government, including military displays of force. According to South Korea, Kim told Tuesday's delegation he "understands" the inability to delay them. South Korean officials said they asked the United States to postpone the drills to reduce tensions with Pyongyang, while US officials said it was only moved to avoid a strain on logistics during the Games

Tb0n3 ago

The fact that talks we're happening was what Q was talking about, but Q is so vague it could mean other shit too.

nowcomesthepain ago

You posted what Q said.. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DXz6P_dVQAEIZiM.jpg

He clearly says... "Deal made. Clowns out. Strings cut." Nice try shill

Tb0n3 ago

If you think it was predicting the future, or talking about insider information, then post the proof of it. Q posted this shit after North and South Korea was reported as having their meeting.

NoisyCricket ago

Again with the lies. You never stop lying. I find it interesting you ALWAYS avoid mentioning the photos - provided months before.

Dang, busted again! SHILL!

Tb0n3 ago

WHAT PHOTOS YOU FUCKING RETARD FAGGOT?

NoisyCricket ago

LOL. But you said you tried to research it... The same photos which have now been mentioned several times...

Sounds like you have some research to do.

Tb0n3 ago

If you actually want to convince anybody then post the pictures. You've basically just typed a bunch of insults and I got tired of it. If you posted actual proof in there, then take 5 seconds and repost it, or else I'll continue to assume you're a lying shill yourself. Getting paid in rubles or what the fuck ever.

NoisyCricket ago

I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I'm simply proving you to be a whore-shill and a chronic liar. Mission Achieved.

Let's summarize. You were pointed in the right direction, you lied about it, then lied some more, and then constantly lied, you accidentally confirmed you're a shill, lied some more and then lied some more. Along the way you completely ignored overwhelming evidence and now admit you lied that you never made any effort to research anything all the while insisting that Q is fake and that your fake "research" confirmed Q was fake while it actually confirmed absolutely nothing at all.

Yaaa.... Shill... you then continue shilling using a tactic designed to waste everyone else's time - except your own.

This is what is so awesome about NK. It's literally impossible for anyone to claim it doesn't prove Q is real without outing themselves as either an idiot and a liar or a shill and a liar. Anyone who has bothered to learn understands this to be true. Thusly the three groups at the top of this thread. Which why no one wants to play your shill games. The exact same shill games Tallest Shill employs. As if it's right out of a book...