You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

crazy_eyes ago

Where is the confirmation?

KnightsofHubris ago

The nypd is not in the chain of possesion.

crazy_eyes ago

Doesn't mean they never had it

KnightsofHubris ago

Here's the time line.

Weiner sexting with the girl breaks in British press. The daily mail article is dated Sep 21, 2016

Sept 22 Feds announce they are investigating

Sept 22 Locals announce they are investigating

Sept 23 Weiner turns over his devices to a security firm. This date is mentioned in the unsealed documents today.

My educated guess is that Weiner's lawyer knew a subpoena was coming. The Feds may have even asked the lawyer to make sure he preserved evidence. Weiner is not named anywere in the warrant. He is called the Target Subject. The security firm is named in the warrant.

Sept 26 This warrant is signed by a judge at 2.57PM

The warrant only allows the FBI to go the security firm, Granite Intelligence. LLC. So there was obviously some discussion with Weiner's lawyers if the FBI knew the laptops were given to a third party.

So when does the NYPD get the laptop? The original pizzagate stories claimed the FBI got the laptop FROM the NYPD. This is false.

The chain of possession is Weiner > Granite >FBI.

This means any story that the NYPD seized the laptop and the laptop was then taken from the NYPD by the FBI is false.

I don't see any other conclusion here.

crazy_eyes ago

It is possible that the NYPD was investigating before they announced it

KnightsofHubris ago

It is not.

I think you're just playing pretend and not dealing with the actual evidence we have.

The fact that Weiner was sexting with an underage girl was not known before Sept 21, 2016. This was not public knowledge. The people who knew were the girl, Weiner, her family maybe? and ??? It's not even know how the press found out about it.

But this whole thing goes into motion on Sept 21 2016 and we known a chain of custody from that date.

bopper ago

@KnightsofHubris Now's your chance to tell me you're not AWS but you won't...

i_scream_trucks ago

maybe its not weiner thats the bad guy and thats just a muckraking accusation to cover something else up.

maybe the evidence on this laptop points to other players being bad and he had it sent to the security firm so it wouldnt vanish full stop.

if you had a pc with an epic amount of evidence of child porn on yourself and knew you were gonna get fucked, youre not gonna hand the computer over to a security company for protection.... youd fly to Hawaii and dump it in the lava wouldnt you? "Oh im sorry judge, i was on my way here to comply with the order to hand over my laptop when i slipped and fell and my laptop dropped into a vat of hydrochloric acid i just happened to be walking past and now theres nothing left, i plead guilty to being butterfingers, plz prosecute me"

Please dont think im shilling or anything... this is just an observation that it seems odd that a dude that apparently is guitly guilty guilty seems to be co-operating and specifically had this evidence 'against him' preserved.

KnightsofHubris ago

seems a stretch

youllrememberme ago

You're talking to Are_We_Sure. https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2550145/12793413

Here's the proof he's still full of shit. http://archive.is/qbPN3

crazy_eyes ago

The NSA may have known before that date, they have all the texts

bopper ago

That person is the resident shill I'm afraid. Can't hide worth a flip.