Legal precedent is one of the most important contributors to court decisions. If the FBI is able to set precedent for hacking iphones of terrorists, it gives then a pathway for accessing private data and matters of other "criminals". The challenge then transitions away from " what am I allowed to access" to " who am I allowed to access", which is an extremely slippery slope.
view the rest of the comments →
Solo ago
Legal precedent is one of the most important contributors to court decisions. If the FBI is able to set precedent for hacking iphones of terrorists, it gives then a pathway for accessing private data and matters of other "criminals". The challenge then transitions away from " what am I allowed to access" to " who am I allowed to access", which is an extremely slippery slope.