The idea of privately owned central banks ROBS the people any power over monetary policy. Money is for the bankers by the bankers, they privately sell "reserve notes" in exchange for US treasury bonds (backed by the goods/services YOU as a nation are capable of producing) in essence taking the right to be prosperous all for themselves. If we can change the way we look at this world, this life, to eliminate this predatory form of existence maybe we could get past all the injustice this life has to offer!
view the rest of the comments →
madmalloy ago
Banks should be a public utility, not privately owned.
un1ty ago
Although I agree, I tend to wonder what would happen with our inept government directly in charge of the printing presses. They have the purse, what it the purse was bottomless (in that they just legislate to print more)?
I mean, now its pretty much proven that income tax is the repayment of the interest the government owes to the Fed for borrowing.
I guess what I am trying to say is although not having the Fed would be outstanding, would having our idiot rulers be much better?
Peglius ago
well first of all according to the Constitution ONLY congress can print money, and i think that if you eliminate the vast amount of voter fraud and elect people that actually have the people of this nations best interest at hand (using currency as a public utility), then we would see a much more balanced nation!
Peglius ago
simple yet so so so so true, people walk around in slave chains and smile and consume, smile and consume......