... I'm absolutely convinced it's not legit. These speeches are fluff. They're essentially money laundering. This is essentially how they run. Every time I've attended a "celebrity address" to board members, shareholders, faculty, I've been astounded at what idiots they are.
The tone was all wrong, and I bet Hilldog phoned in some shit about "growth and innovation". All she does is hammer buzzwords. That parody had more substance than her word salad.
When she's talking to us 'losers' she doesn't need anything more than buzzwords, deflection, and her vagina. Even if it was satire I sense that's exactly how her and her contributors are.
I don't think it's a question of "need". Look at how that woman "communicates": it's pablum for media manipulation, with some kind of quality control ensure by buzzwords so her "meanings" can't be taken out of context.
Neither bankers nor politicians think about people who are not in the room. In my experience, she was more likely to name check the people who invited her (so they could be tagged as Friends of Bill by their underlings) than making any statement, positive or negative.
view the rest of the comments →
McBitches ago
I'm convinced its legit. Came out of lurking to post everywhere I can. This is how they view us.
pitenius ago
... I'm absolutely convinced it's not legit. These speeches are fluff. They're essentially money laundering. This is essentially how they run. Every time I've attended a "celebrity address" to board members, shareholders, faculty, I've been astounded at what idiots they are.
The tone was all wrong, and I bet Hilldog phoned in some shit about "growth and innovation". All she does is hammer buzzwords. That parody had more substance than her word salad.
darkcharp ago
Exactly. She's talking to a room full of people, not one or two. And like you said, the tone is all wrong anyway.
McBitches ago
When she's talking to us 'losers' she doesn't need anything more than buzzwords, deflection, and her vagina. Even if it was satire I sense that's exactly how her and her contributors are.
pitenius ago
:-/
I don't think it's a question of "need". Look at how that woman "communicates": it's pablum for media manipulation, with some kind of quality control ensure by buzzwords so her "meanings" can't be taken out of context.
Neither bankers nor politicians think about people who are not in the room. In my experience, she was more likely to name check the people who invited her (so they could be tagged as Friends of Bill by their underlings) than making any statement, positive or negative.
McBitches ago
Yeah according to this link it was all about thoroughly stroking their egos like a high priced whore. She would definitely do that.