Nice scoop. Notably a solid connection to what was obviously suspected. If it works for climate change deniability then why not make it work for big pharma?
Name and shame is a good start. But really, any 'scientist/doctor' that fabricates data to further an opinion they are paid for is a piece of human filth. Literally wolves in sheeps clothing. If there is any justice in the cosmos, these people are damned.
False equivalency, the 'climate change' debate is big coal (anti) and big oil (pro) fighting with each other, the whole process is corrupt and it's all political and money driven bullshit. I mean for fucks sakes, learn the history! BP and Dutch Royal Shell sat in on the original meetings with Clinton and Gore in the 90's!
view the rest of the comments →
QuestionEverything ago
Nice scoop. Notably a solid connection to what was obviously suspected. If it works for climate change deniability then why not make it work for big pharma?
Name and shame is a good start. But really, any 'scientist/doctor' that fabricates data to further an opinion they are paid for is a piece of human filth. Literally wolves in sheeps clothing. If there is any justice in the cosmos, these people are damned.
OWNtheNWO ago
False equivalency, the 'climate change' debate is big coal (anti) and big oil (pro) fighting with each other, the whole process is corrupt and it's all political and money driven bullshit. I mean for fucks sakes, learn the history! BP and Dutch Royal Shell sat in on the original meetings with Clinton and Gore in the 90's!