I read a good portion of the book "Nobody Died At Sandy Hook" via the free pdf (due to its banning from Amazon) and was so captivated that I bought a physical copy via a reprint. It's very compelling and I do believe it. My question is, wouldn't it have been easier for the government to simply arrange the shooting rather than fake it? It seems like a lot less loose ends. My theory is that if the truth ever does come to the mainstream, since the event was a hoax, the gov wouldn't have killed anyone so it wouldn't be seen as such a big deal. What are your guys' thoughts?
Tldr: it's easier to stage an event than fake one, why was Sandy Hook faked rather than created?
view the rest of the comments →
QuestionEverything ago
9/11 taught them some valuable lessons. First and foremost, killing people makes other people ask a lot of questions, and they don't go away easily.
Just remember. None of these cases EVER gain any traction because we are asking the perpetrators to investigate themselves. TRACTION is one of the biggest things they fear.
So, no killing unless necessary. But they are still killing anyone caught in the process who is not under their control. Boston bombing: the two Boston FBI agents that weren't FED? -Killed simultaneously in a training accident.. The 38 year old BPD who ran into them? -Brain aneurysm.
Zero words from defendant. Brother and cousin killed while in FED FBI custody.
It's just plainly shady: Actor's, laughing dad, lottery inconsistencies, mortgage payoffs, FBI stooges like Arrendondo, non-existent medical records, anomalous recovery times, pictures that simply show this was a hoax..
Biggest overlooked fact imo: Pictures clearly showing the bomb backpack came from a CRAFT AGENT and did not match the backpack Tsarnaev was carrying.
It's a complete mockery of justice. Why? I don't know, but it's nefarious.
http://imgur.com/a/Nx8EU
respondwithdata ago
This was the incident that made me actually take the Sandy Hook deniers seriously.