I read a good portion of the book "Nobody Died At Sandy Hook" via the free pdf (due to its banning from Amazon) and was so captivated that I bought a physical copy via a reprint. It's very compelling and I do believe it. My question is, wouldn't it have been easier for the government to simply arrange the shooting rather than fake it? It seems like a lot less loose ends. My theory is that if the truth ever does come to the mainstream, since the event was a hoax, the gov wouldn't have killed anyone so it wouldn't be seen as such a big deal. What are your guys' thoughts?
Tldr: it's easier to stage an event than fake one, why was Sandy Hook faked rather than created?
view the rest of the comments →
threesevens ago
They have done both with false flag attacks, and depends on the situation. I think pulling this particular event off would be very difficult to control through arranging an actual shooter that would kill little kids. Controlling the fake families is easy. If those families were real, they would have seen immediately that what the authorities were telling them was fishy and would have started digging. I have no doubt that a group of families bereaved of a child would eventually get to the truth. The surviving families of 9/11 were so vocal that they forced the 9/11 commission, even though it was a complete farce. Some mistakes are made out of overconfidence. I mean if they can get away with 9/11 they must think they can get away with almost anything and the public will believe it.