Most of that information is correct in my opinion and based on the research I've done.
But none of the planes involved in 9/11 was a Boeing 757 or 767. The planes were Global Hawks modified to look somewhat like passenger planes. This is why an Air Force Lt. Colonel who was working in the Pentagon that day, and was on the scene within minutes, is on record as saying, and I paraphrase: We all wondered at what we saw. Where were the bodies, baggage,and where were the jet engines that are notoriously difficult to destroy? A sheriff in Pennsylvania who was one of the first to respond to the "crash" there said, and again I paraphrase: I have seen crash sites before, and that was no crash site. It was a smoking hole in the ground with no baggage, bodies, engines, or other debris, visible.
The Global Hawk is made of very light material and was designed to be pilotless and flown by remote.
globalhawks? Bit of a size discrepancy there.
that is lunacy, and even contradicts yogr own cherypicked testimony, a globalgawk isn't going to leave a giant smokung hole in a concrete reinforced fortress.
It would if it had explosives in it. The modifie versions would be very difficult for even experts to pick out at altitude and high speed. Several eye witnesses said the plane they saw had no windows. And where are the engines: in Pennsylvania, the pentagon, and at the WTC. You know more than an Air Force Lt. Colonel, on the scene, about all this, do you? You must be an expert.
I have seen pictures of the turbine being pulled out of there, it definately was not a globalhawk.
I do not care to speculate on the motives of this supposed lt. Colonel, but I do know that for every 1 witness that contradics the fact it was an air liner, there are dozens that don't.
I have done a lot of research on the subject and have never seen, nor heard of a jet engine being pulled out of "there," wherever you mean. Not WTC, Pennsylvania, or the Pentagon. I challenge you to show a picture of it.
If you did " a lot of research" you would defiantly come across the various conspiracy theories surrounding this very image.
Youtube videos do not constitute "research".
The picture shows a part of the Global Hawk engine, and wide-angle shots show no bodies or baggage. By the way, where is the rest of that HUGE engine, not to mention the other engine.
You would be the second person over the past several days that's tried to convince me of some fantastic conspiracy involving 9/11.
The last guy tried to convince me the "Jews" planted a tactical nuke inside the towers.... How someone could be so stupid, i don't know.
There is very little proof of any method of destruction other than those planes, and i personally have met someone who witnessed it, first hand.
Now.. I would definitely have to say i don't trust the government, pretty much ever.
I think it's likely they had foreknowledge of that event, and whether it was gross incompetence, or malicious intent, that nothing was done, we may never know.
However, they did latch onto it as an excuse to launch pointless, unethical wars for personal profit, that should be obvious enough.
I too have done a fair bit of "research". Osama Bin Laden claimed responsibility for those attacks.
It was actually bin laden, i have seen and heard enough of his writing to be confident of that, though i wouldn't it past the
cia to fake videos, i believe in this case there was no need. obl's address to the american people was quite clear as to his reasoning,
and was anything but flattering to our so called "leaders".
Which Osama are you talking about? There were at least three different ones in the videos and tapes. The faces and voices don't match up. This according to a professor and Arabic expert at Duke University. The real Osama, who was alive for 9/11, specifically said he was not involved in 9/11. Denial is not the usual MO of terrorists. I have one word for you: MOSSAD.
I see: you want me to stop because you can't conceive of such a plan. I would never say the Jews did it. I would say the Likud Party did it, and that is quite different I be lie ve.
view the rest of the comments →
jervybingly ago
Most of that information is correct in my opinion and based on the research I've done.
But none of the planes involved in 9/11 was a Boeing 757 or 767. The planes were Global Hawks modified to look somewhat like passenger planes. This is why an Air Force Lt. Colonel who was working in the Pentagon that day, and was on the scene within minutes, is on record as saying, and I paraphrase: We all wondered at what we saw. Where were the bodies, baggage,and where were the jet engines that are notoriously difficult to destroy? A sheriff in Pennsylvania who was one of the first to respond to the "crash" there said, and again I paraphrase: I have seen crash sites before, and that was no crash site. It was a smoking hole in the ground with no baggage, bodies, engines, or other debris, visible.
The Global Hawk is made of very light material and was designed to be pilotless and flown by remote.
glennvtx ago
globalhawks? Bit of a size discrepancy there. that is lunacy, and even contradicts yogr own cherypicked testimony, a globalgawk isn't going to leave a giant smokung hole in a concrete reinforced fortress.
jervybingly ago
It would if it had explosives in it. The modifie versions would be very difficult for even experts to pick out at altitude and high speed. Several eye witnesses said the plane they saw had no windows. And where are the engines: in Pennsylvania, the pentagon, and at the WTC. You know more than an Air Force Lt. Colonel, on the scene, about all this, do you? You must be an expert.
glennvtx ago
I have seen pictures of the turbine being pulled out of there, it definately was not a globalhawk. I do not care to speculate on the motives of this supposed lt. Colonel, but I do know that for every 1 witness that contradics the fact it was an air liner, there are dozens that don't.
jervybingly ago
I have done a lot of research on the subject and have never seen, nor heard of a jet engine being pulled out of "there," wherever you mean. Not WTC, Pennsylvania, or the Pentagon. I challenge you to show a picture of it.
glennvtx ago
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
If you did " a lot of research" you would defiantly come across the various conspiracy theories surrounding this very image. Youtube videos do not constitute "research".
jervybingly ago
The picture shows a part of the Global Hawk engine, and wide-angle shots show no bodies or baggage. By the way, where is the rest of that HUGE engine, not to mention the other engine.
glennvtx ago
You would be the second person over the past several days that's tried to convince me of some fantastic conspiracy involving 9/11. The last guy tried to convince me the "Jews" planted a tactical nuke inside the towers.... How someone could be so stupid, i don't know. There is very little proof of any method of destruction other than those planes, and i personally have met someone who witnessed it, first hand. Now.. I would definitely have to say i don't trust the government, pretty much ever. I think it's likely they had foreknowledge of that event, and whether it was gross incompetence, or malicious intent, that nothing was done, we may never know. However, they did latch onto it as an excuse to launch pointless, unethical wars for personal profit, that should be obvious enough.
I too have done a fair bit of "research". Osama Bin Laden claimed responsibility for those attacks. It was actually bin laden, i have seen and heard enough of his writing to be confident of that, though i wouldn't it past the cia to fake videos, i believe in this case there was no need. obl's address to the american people was quite clear as to his reasoning, and was anything but flattering to our so called "leaders".
jervybingly ago
Which Osama are you talking about? There were at least three different ones in the videos and tapes. The faces and voices don't match up. This according to a professor and Arabic expert at Duke University. The real Osama, who was alive for 9/11, specifically said he was not involved in 9/11. Denial is not the usual MO of terrorists. I have one word for you: MOSSAD.
glennvtx ago
Oh i see, your one of those "the Jews did it" people. There's not one shred of proof of this, We are not going to agree, so just please stop.
jervybingly ago
I see: you want me to stop because you can't conceive of such a plan. I would never say the Jews did it. I would say the Likud Party did it, and that is quite different I be lie ve.