Smoking? Yeah that's cool. Alcohol? Yeah coolio. Want to eat cholesterol laden mars bars fried in greasy shit? No problem. Load yourself up with diabeetus soda? Have fun.
Want to drink some raw milk? Fuck you, get arrested.
They need some multi national corporation to start selling raw milk, then the government would back off.
Fucking pieces of shit. I guess the police have caught all the bad guys and the Ministry of natural resources has investigated all oil spills and environmental pollution that they now have time to go after people who want to drink some motherfucking milk.
Actually raw milk has enzymes that counter act any negative bacteria. Pasteurization kills those enzymes, and then the milk has no defense against the bacteria coming back. Which is why (I speculate) there Is a growing population of lactose intolerant consumers
Actually raw milk has enzymes that counter act any negative bacteria.
That is nonsense, if that were true then it would be fresh longer than pasteurised milk, which it is not. Lactose intolerance is genetic and not due to how milk is. It is a reaction to Lactose because they can't digest it. It does not matter if they have some bacteria infested raw milk. Raw milk can be dangerous so it is important that it is not stored for a long time.
view the rest of the comments →
turdovski ago
Smoking? Yeah that's cool. Alcohol? Yeah coolio. Want to eat cholesterol laden mars bars fried in greasy shit? No problem. Load yourself up with diabeetus soda? Have fun.
Want to drink some raw milk? Fuck you, get arrested.
They need some multi national corporation to start selling raw milk, then the government would back off.
Fucking pieces of shit. I guess the police have caught all the bad guys and the Ministry of natural resources has investigated all oil spills and environmental pollution that they now have time to go after people who want to drink some motherfucking milk.
Kaizervonmaanen ago
Raw milk can easily be dangerous because it is not pasteurised. Corporations would get tons of lawsuits
Ryanwolf ago
Actually raw milk has enzymes that counter act any negative bacteria. Pasteurization kills those enzymes, and then the milk has no defense against the bacteria coming back. Which is why (I speculate) there Is a growing population of lactose intolerant consumers
Kaizervonmaanen ago
That is nonsense, if that were true then it would be fresh longer than pasteurised milk, which it is not. Lactose intolerance is genetic and not due to how milk is. It is a reaction to Lactose because they can't digest it. It does not matter if they have some bacteria infested raw milk. Raw milk can be dangerous so it is important that it is not stored for a long time.