...no evidence is the dominant theme around the official sandy hook story, whereas "endless flow of evidence" best describes the hoax viewpoint. For those who have not yet looked into it, this is really the best of the best "conspiracy" to look into - I think what you'll find is that it being a hoax is actually FAR MORE PROBABLE than otherwise, thereby essentially flipping the burden of proof.
It's not up to us to prove it didn't happen - it's up to someone, anyone, to offer some actual proof that it did. And thus far, nothing but crickets and illegal acts that shout "cover-up" from the mountaintop.
view the rest of the comments →
pyres ago
there is also no evidence that there were elephants and giraffes in the school at the time.
Maybe you can theorize about chem trails or something instead.
grandmacaesar ago
Your logical fallacy is burden of proof. We have been shown no proof that anyone was murdered at Sandy Hook Elementary on 12-14-2012. It is up to the person or persons making the claim to show proof.
Do you claim children were murdered there on that date? Show proof.
You want proof that no one was murdered there? I can show you pix of no bodies all day long.
Empire_of_the_mind ago
Those who make extraordinary claims (that this incident occurred as described on TV)should be prepared to show at least moderate evidence.
Lake ago
Or you could prove that it happened like they asked. I'm honestly not on the conspiracy side of this argument but the original post asked for proof and you just side stepped the question.
There is also no evidence that an elephant was or wasn't there when someone was shot. What's your point?