I was thinking about how Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn's visit to the UN may have actually been illegal and in violation of the Logan Act as it amounted to asking foreign powers to force the US into a specific decision on the debated controversy of controlling 'hate speech' on the internet.
There is no signs that they are going to face any prosecution or get in any trouble at all... perhaps there is a good reason for this? The Logan Act specifies that such communications can only be done by people 'authorized by the US,' so were Anita and Zoe actually authorized? Perhaps on behalf of the CIA or some comparable agency? I only say the CIA because I know they have a long history of getting agents and assets involved in the UN.
Anyway, just a thought.
Tripsick ago
Just the good work of propaganda. divide and conquer
33degree ago
Not knowingly imo. Check out this video. The kid connects the "Feminist Frequency" website all the way back to the DIA and DiGRA (part of DARPA). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18gU4HSkW9Y
Bilbo_Swaggins ago
Even if not, they're women talking about women stuff. Women are like gods in this society. Prosecuting one while she's talking about women stuff is major bad juju.
Also, if she had CIA money then she wouldn't have needed a crowd fund.
whisky_cat ago
This is the correct Adam Sandler reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsIgOj68G1Y&t=270. Gotta skip to 2m30s if the timestamp doesn't work.
whisky_cat ago
I wish Adam Sandler did an AMA on Voat.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
SaneGoatiSwear ago
SaneGoatiSwear ago
that's my secret...
i'm always bent out of shape about every little thing.
Fuckmesilly ago
Feminists are useful idiots.
pitenius ago
Allll-righty, then!
pitenius ago
? I don't wanna hurt /u/Goatboy.
pray_the_gay_away ago
At the very least, we know that you don't get to address the entire UN assembly on a highly controversial issue that threatens personal liberty around the world without the support of some heavy hitters in the deep state. But I agree with other posters that they are probably just pawns and too fucking stupid to realize that they are being used.
Bilbo_Swaggins ago
I doubt that. I think that Sarkeesian at least is less of an SJW or operative and more of a con artist greedily seizing the spot light, building a shitty little throne for herself out of scraps of Frankfurt School garbage.
Pawn ago
they barely understand the internet, they sure as hell won't see themselves being used.
lorlipone ago
Gonna have to look that up. If true; wow.
Edit: Is true; Wow. Thanks for a new thread to tug at.
goatboy ago
No. Andrea Dworkin and her ilk were trained by Soviet agents in Amsterdam back in the 60s and 70s. They were called the Provo or Provocateur School. After the collapse (strategic retreat) of the Soviet Empire, most of the Soviet's foreign assets continued on with what they had been doing previously, while biding their time and waiting for the re-emergence of the Soviet empire. The Provo School mostly hooked up with their comrades in the Frankfurt School and settled into the highest echelons of US and European academia, corrupting a generation of youth.
Snarksleezian and Quinn are more con artists than provocateurs. It's an important distinction. They are SigTel Mercenaries, rather than ideologically committed operatives. That crowd will whore themselves out to the highest bidder, while the 3rd wave crowd are actually committed to the cause of a One Socialist World Empire- complete with central planning and zero prosperity incentive (basically a failed world wide State waiting to happen).
SaneGoatiSwear ago
pitenius ago
You astound me. Congratulations.