There are too many people involved which too many moving parts. Someone, somewhere would talk if this was fake. Same with Sandy Hook, 9/11, the moon landing. The real conspiracies are when there are very few people involved.
I'm not a shill, I just think sometimes you guys go a little overboard. Two people got shot and yall are claiming false flag based on a go pro video. It just feels a little disrespectful to me thats all. The bodies aren't even cold....
Shills will be shills whether they're paid in money or attention.
The longer a crime goes uninvestigated the harder it is to piece together. Don't get on us with that "too soon" bullshit. If anything it's too late. The guy apparently had a history of anger, a "human powder keg.. Waiting to go BOOM," who was ready for a "race war."
This is the stuff fairy tales are made of people. The way I see it, either the event was orchestrated deliberately to resound with the MSM's current gun ban and race war narratives, or it is an indeliberate echo of MSM rhetoric on those same narratives.
I don't believe one way or another. Belief is the death of intelligence. I strongly suspect that Oswald was a patsy, there were numerous gunmen, and complicity on the parts of certain members of the criminal federal government and criminal intelligence agencies who may have hired mafia assassins to do the hit.
The links between intelligence agencies and the mafia are well documented. Just look up the P2 lodge.
cmon man you cant lump 911 in with sandy hook and this nonsense. here at conspiracy we ask questions and explore the possibility of absolutely ridiculous notions. sometimes we are right. I just really hope that you dig deep enough to discover the most likely truth of 911. i dont mean to be a dick. sorry. just please explore our perspective some more. all i can iterate is that a building will absolutely not fall the way building 7 fell if some burning ruble fell on it. i mean freefall cmon now
My friend started posting this conspiracy stuff on Facebook now I think he's going too far. He does not trust the government and has talked about the sovereign citizen movement. It started with 9/11 and now he has gone full nut job. He posted this video today claiming it was a hoax to take away our guns. This shit scares me.
Seriously though. Or maybe you join the police/military. Or start reading the news from sources besides GE, Newscorp, Disney, Viacom, Time Warner and CBS.
If you don't know 9/11 had elements of an inside job' then you haven't been paying close enough attention.
I can't say much about BBC or RT's biases other than rather speculatively assuming they pander to British and Russian corporate interest in the same way American propaganda outlets pander to American corporate interests.
And the question was rhetorical, namely that your attention has been divided between the circus and the carnival.
I look for publications that have had a proven track record and have built trust by being correct. My trust is earned. Show me some good, hard journalistic work that is correct, then you have my trust.
view the rest of the comments →
Malek ago
There are too many people involved which too many moving parts. Someone, somewhere would talk if this was fake. Same with Sandy Hook, 9/11, the moon landing. The real conspiracies are when there are very few people involved.
anthonylancer ago
cmon man everyone knows about 911 already dont go shillin up in our parts
Malek ago
I'm not a shill, I just think sometimes you guys go a little overboard. Two people got shot and yall are claiming false flag based on a go pro video. It just feels a little disrespectful to me thats all. The bodies aren't even cold....
Dysnomia ago
Shills will be shills whether they're paid in money or attention.
The longer a crime goes uninvestigated the harder it is to piece together. Don't get on us with that "too soon" bullshit. If anything it's too late. The guy apparently had a history of anger, a "human powder keg.. Waiting to go BOOM," who was ready for a "race war."
This is the stuff fairy tales are made of people. The way I see it, either the event was orchestrated deliberately to resound with the MSM's current gun ban and race war narratives, or it is an indeliberate echo of MSM rhetoric on those same narratives.
Malek ago
So do you believe this guy was a lone nut job or was he in on it with the two other people that should be alive if that gun was fake?
Dysnomia ago
I don't believe one way or another. Belief is the death of intelligence. I strongly suspect that Oswald was a patsy, there were numerous gunmen, and complicity on the parts of certain members of the criminal federal government and criminal intelligence agencies who may have hired mafia assassins to do the hit.
The links between intelligence agencies and the mafia are well documented. Just look up the P2 lodge.
Malek ago
Nice pivot.
anthonylancer ago
cmon man you cant lump 911 in with sandy hook and this nonsense. here at conspiracy we ask questions and explore the possibility of absolutely ridiculous notions. sometimes we are right. I just really hope that you dig deep enough to discover the most likely truth of 911. i dont mean to be a dick. sorry. just please explore our perspective some more. all i can iterate is that a building will absolutely not fall the way building 7 fell if some burning ruble fell on it. i mean freefall cmon now
Malek ago
My friend started posting this conspiracy stuff on Facebook now I think he's going too far. He does not trust the government and has talked about the sovereign citizen movement. It started with 9/11 and now he has gone full nut job. He posted this video today claiming it was a hoax to take away our guns. This shit scares me.
Dysnomia ago
Maybe you should go out and buy a gun.
Kek kek kek.
Seriously though. Or maybe you join the police/military. Or start reading the news from sources besides GE, Newscorp, Disney, Viacom, Time Warner and CBS.
If you don't know 9/11 had elements of an inside job' then you haven't been paying close enough attention.
Quick, who's your favorite quarterback?
Malek ago
I liked al-jazeera America before it got too popular. The BBC seems to be pretty fair. Rt is good for anything that doesn't involve Russia.
Current or former player?
Dysnomia ago
http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/09/19/what-wikileaks-tells-us-about-al-jazeera/
I can't say much about BBC or RT's biases other than rather speculatively assuming they pander to British and Russian corporate interest in the same way American propaganda outlets pander to American corporate interests.
And the question was rhetorical, namely that your attention has been divided between the circus and the carnival.
Malek ago
I look for publications that have had a proven track record and have built trust by being correct. My trust is earned. Show me some good, hard journalistic work that is correct, then you have my trust.
Dysnomia ago
"Proven" "trust" "correct".
These words mean different things to us I think.
Malek ago
You can't go through life without trusting things, systems, people, and other things. The best way to build trust is repeat ability.
Dysnomia ago
Repeatability is also the best way to lose trust.