Not saying that you're incorrect--or that the poster of this video is incorrect either--but my sampling (both ground and air) shows that they are comprised overwhelmingly of aluminum and barium.
The lab did not test for coal ash--as I had no idea about it. Perhaps the small samples that I still have refrigerated can be re-tested (when I have the money) for coal ash specifically. Of course, I'll keep you informed.
I use to not give a lot of credit to the whole chemtrail/geoengineering thing, but about two years back I saw a straight white cloud in Adelaide, Australia. I saw similar straight white clouds, isolated and by themselves, continue for kilometres through Southern Australia and up into the Northern Territory.
I've seen them where I currently live as well, although I've never seen planes "spraying." I though it would be interesting to be able to somehow collect samples and find out what was actually up there.
There are a lot of random slides like this up with photos of planes with tanks and sprayers, but some of them come from sources that have nothing to do with geoengineering and some are obvious fakes. I'd like to see some real sources and identifying plan info and detective work. Surely there's gotta be a way to track some of this down and expose it.
Not sure that I know exactly what you're asking but I'll try to answer:
I got air samples by applying two sterile sampling pads (adhesive) to the tail of my aircraft and flying through the "haze" brought on by spraying about 4 hours after it was sprayed. I got a control sample by flying at the same altitude, over the same airspace, at the same time of day--on a very clear day. Sample pads were handled with sterile plastic instruments that look somewhat like a cross between tweezers and scalpels. Both sent to lab.No contamination from hydrocarbons were present (ruling out my engine's exhaust) except for "normal" atmospheric levels.
The ground samples were taken in an open, fenced-off field with few trees present. This land was set aside for a park by the state and never properly used. My "control" was taken on a clear day (and showed plenty of aluminum/barium) consisting of grass and 1 square inch of topsoil. The other sample was taken 34 hours after a very heavy "spray day" (85 hours after first sample) approximately 1 foot from where the control sample was taken. There was NO precip between the sampling on the clear day and the "spray day."
These were handled with sterile wooden tongue depressors and placed into sterile plastic "sampling tubes" which were immediately capped and sent into a different environmental lab. Aluminum levels were approximately 43x greater in the "sprayed" samples than in the control samples.
view the rest of the comments →
xanaxinator ago
Not saying that you're incorrect--or that the poster of this video is incorrect either--but my sampling (both ground and air) shows that they are comprised overwhelmingly of aluminum and barium.
The lab did not test for coal ash--as I had no idea about it. Perhaps the small samples that I still have refrigerated can be re-tested (when I have the money) for coal ash specifically. Of course, I'll keep you informed.
djsumdog ago
How did you pick up your samples?
I use to not give a lot of credit to the whole chemtrail/geoengineering thing, but about two years back I saw a straight white cloud in Adelaide, Australia. I saw similar straight white clouds, isolated and by themselves, continue for kilometres through Southern Australia and up into the Northern Territory.
I've seen them where I currently live as well, although I've never seen planes "spraying." I though it would be interesting to be able to somehow collect samples and find out what was actually up there.
There are a lot of random slides like this up with photos of planes with tanks and sprayers, but some of them come from sources that have nothing to do with geoengineering and some are obvious fakes. I'd like to see some real sources and identifying plan info and detective work. Surely there's gotta be a way to track some of this down and expose it.
xanaxinator ago
Not sure that I know exactly what you're asking but I'll try to answer:
I got air samples by applying two sterile sampling pads (adhesive) to the tail of my aircraft and flying through the "haze" brought on by spraying about 4 hours after it was sprayed. I got a control sample by flying at the same altitude, over the same airspace, at the same time of day--on a very clear day. Sample pads were handled with sterile plastic instruments that look somewhat like a cross between tweezers and scalpels. Both sent to lab.No contamination from hydrocarbons were present (ruling out my engine's exhaust) except for "normal" atmospheric levels.
The ground samples were taken in an open, fenced-off field with few trees present. This land was set aside for a park by the state and never properly used. My "control" was taken on a clear day (and showed plenty of aluminum/barium) consisting of grass and 1 square inch of topsoil. The other sample was taken 34 hours after a very heavy "spray day" (85 hours after first sample) approximately 1 foot from where the control sample was taken. There was NO precip between the sampling on the clear day and the "spray day."
These were handled with sterile wooden tongue depressors and placed into sterile plastic "sampling tubes" which were immediately capped and sent into a different environmental lab. Aluminum levels were approximately 43x greater in the "sprayed" samples than in the control samples.
Is that the info you were looking for?
djsumdog ago
Yes. That is very interesting indeed.
Are there any more chemtrail conferences scheduled? Something like this would make an incredible writeup.