2004: CDC Study:
Age at First Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccination in Children With Autism and School-Matched Control Subjects: A Population-Based Study in Metropolitan Atlanta
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14754936
2014, CDC whistleblower press release:
"...i regret my coauthors and i omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in journal Pediatrics. the omitted data suggested AA males who received MMR vaccine before age 36 mo were at increased risk for autism..."
~ Dr William Thompson, CDC whistleblower
https://i.redd.it/1rb482xb9ty41.png
2014, CDC statement on CDC whistleblower:
The study looked at different age groups: children vaccinated by 18 months, 24 months, and 36 months. The findings revealed that vaccination between 24 and 36 months was slightly more common among children with autism, and that association was strongest among children 3-5 years of age. The authors reported this finding was most likely a result of immunization requirements for preschool special education program attendance in children with autism.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Concerns/Autism/cdc2004pediatrics.html
So instead of retracting the admitted fraud, in 2014 the CDC decided to double-down, and claim (without evidence) that the reason vaccines are linked to autism is because autism causes vaccines
The CDC could not show where a single child in their study had ever attended any special needs pre-school, or was vaccinated because of that preschool.
The CDC went on to claim (without evidence) that their fraudulent study had been properly replicated (per the scientific method) which appears to be another false statement, since nobody can find the newer studies that replicated the fraudulent CDC study.
And instead of Snopes admitting the CDC whistleblower claim was true, Snopes decided to call it “false” based on something someone else did with the data that the CDC decided fo omit.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bad-medicine/
And instead of addressing the facts that the CDC whistleblower disclosed, the notorious pro-vaccine shill Dr David Gorski went for the ad hominem attack, and said Dr William Thompson was “anti-vaccine”, as if that somehow makes Thompson less credible.
https://respectfulinsolence.com/2015/08/05/the-cdc-whistleblower-william-thompson-appears-to-have-gone-full-antivaccine/
Quote:
Oh my God, i cannot believe that we did was what we did, but we did it. It's all there. This is the lowest point in my career, that I went along with that paper. I have great shame now when I meet families of kids with autism, because I have been part of the problem"
~ Dr William Thompson, CDC whistleblower
Audio: https://youtu.be/hlxdWfTLHH0?t=58m1s
view the rest of the comments →
Civil_Warrior ago
Hillary bought snopes back in the 90s...
Glad I could clear that up for you.
111MrGuy111 ago
I'm going to need some sauce with that...
Civil_Warrior ago
Look up every anti clinton thing on snopes.
111MrGuy111 ago
Same for Obama and every other libtard ally. That doesn't prove that Clintons own it.
Civil_Warrior ago
Sort of like jewsmax throwing more than a million at the clintons and they remain the new fair and balanced guys...lolololo,
Civil_Warrior ago
It does show that SNOPES is paid to shill.
You dont do that shit that consistently,(((jew shillery))) destroying your credibility unless it pays the bills and then some. Snopes is on the take, CLINTON is on the check that comes in for them being a good house nigger.
Planted01 ago
Most of Snopes debunking these days is just to say the claim is false in so many words.
That Trump had 2.7 million or something votes stolen from him was "debunked" by them saying simply that there was no evidence of it, and then they "fortified" that with saying domi ion made a public statement denying that claim , and they posted dominion's statement saying "we categorically deny that ...." Bla bla bla.
Basicly they said " the claim is false because they can't prove it and it is here by debunked because the people being accused of rigging the election day that they didn't reg the election. Case Closed.
111MrGuy111 ago
It really doesn't matter anyway. Snopes lost their credibility over 10 years ago.