There was a theory floating around that a lot of the people in politics, music,and entertainment are basically clones grown in pods with various modifications. It was definitely a fun one to think about, and there seems to be a bunch of examples like the one posted here, showing how many of them look alike.
Also, who can forget the Pence Prime/Time traveling Trump post on 4chan that was making its rounds a few years ago?
Eugenics is certainly a viable solution to create specific types of humans. That said, and I'm just asking questions here,do you think it's possible to clone humans? If so, do you think countries would risk ethical violations to do so? And also, do you think, if given the capacity and capability to do so, those countries would use it for nefarious, or unethical purposes?
Obviously, I'm using the socratic method here. I'm not saying any of this is happening. My answers lead me to believe that it is possible, and maybe probable. I don't know and probably will never know, but it's fun to think about. Call it a thought experiment.
Yes I think it's possible to clone people, but I theorize that they become individuals just as cloned identical twins did during the breeding program. I don't think they can decide to create a clone and age it quickly.
The elite families would take cloned (identical) twins and place them in different families. I think what we are seeing is a lot of that.
I don't know if this is true, but is it not possible to mold cloned people's individual personalities into something advantageous?
I try to keep an open mind when it comes to this shit. There's been too many lies, and too many secrets for me to stand on any solid ground when it comes to any of this. I'd rather not know, and be sure of not knowing, than think I know and be wrong.
I agree,I tend to assume I know little and I take things into consideration even if they counter what I think to be true.
It's really the only way these days.
Everything we see on the science front seems to be pointing that the people in science really have no idea about anything. I think they pretend to know more than they do with so much.
view the rest of the comments →
PeckerwoodPerry ago
There was a theory floating around that a lot of the people in politics, music,and entertainment are basically clones grown in pods with various modifications. It was definitely a fun one to think about, and there seems to be a bunch of examples like the one posted here, showing how many of them look alike.
Also, who can forget the Pence Prime/Time traveling Trump post on 4chan that was making its rounds a few years ago?
Warnos44 ago
I think the reason is more simple. Remember the breeding program of the Nazis? It wasn't the beginning of such a thing.
PeckerwoodPerry ago
Eugenics is certainly a viable solution to create specific types of humans. That said, and I'm just asking questions here,do you think it's possible to clone humans? If so, do you think countries would risk ethical violations to do so? And also, do you think, if given the capacity and capability to do so, those countries would use it for nefarious, or unethical purposes?
Obviously, I'm using the socratic method here. I'm not saying any of this is happening. My answers lead me to believe that it is possible, and maybe probable. I don't know and probably will never know, but it's fun to think about. Call it a thought experiment.
Warnos44 ago
Yes I think it's possible to clone people, but I theorize that they become individuals just as cloned identical twins did during the breeding program. I don't think they can decide to create a clone and age it quickly.
The elite families would take cloned (identical) twins and place them in different families. I think what we are seeing is a lot of that.
PeckerwoodPerry ago
I don't know if this is true, but is it not possible to mold cloned people's individual personalities into something advantageous?
I try to keep an open mind when it comes to this shit. There's been too many lies, and too many secrets for me to stand on any solid ground when it comes to any of this. I'd rather not know, and be sure of not knowing, than think I know and be wrong.
Warnos44 ago
I agree,I tend to assume I know little and I take things into consideration even if they counter what I think to be true.
It's really the only way these days.
Everything we see on the science front seems to be pointing that the people in science really have no idea about anything. I think they pretend to know more than they do with so much.