“They signed a contract with us to experiment here,” he said, offering no details about the terms of the alleged interplanetary deal or the nature of the experimentation – hopefully, nothing too invasive.
What do you mean you "think" you know what he means.
It's very clear that they never once mention experimenting on humans.
If scientist go to Canada to run experiments does that mean they are running experiments on humans?
If marine biologist are doing studies and experiments in a submarine in the abyss do you assume they are doing experiments on humans? If they are doing experiments and research in the jungle do you assume it is on humans?
We go to a lifeless planet or the moon to bring back handfuls of sand, that compared to a handful of earth which is far more interesting then a lifeless lumpnof coal from the moon or mars. One drop of pond water has more interesting things to research and study than anything we've gotten from space, yet we continue to study it just because it's there.
In like every other planet and moon in the known universe, Our soil is basicly alive, and compared to everything else out side of earth it would be considered to be completely alive.
Human beings would be a point of interest to study for sure, but everything on Earth would be worthy of research and "experimenting".
view the rest of the comments →
Shvonce ago
Article doesn't mention anywhere that they experiment on humans.
MetalAegis ago
Planted01 ago
What do you mean you "think" you know what he means.
It's very clear that they never once mention experimenting on humans.
If scientist go to Canada to run experiments does that mean they are running experiments on humans?
If marine biologist are doing studies and experiments in a submarine in the abyss do you assume they are doing experiments on humans? If they are doing experiments and research in the jungle do you assume it is on humans?
We go to a lifeless planet or the moon to bring back handfuls of sand, that compared to a handful of earth which is far more interesting then a lifeless lumpnof coal from the moon or mars. One drop of pond water has more interesting things to research and study than anything we've gotten from space, yet we continue to study it just because it's there.
In like every other planet and moon in the known universe, Our soil is basicly alive, and compared to everything else out side of earth it would be considered to be completely alive.
Human beings would be a point of interest to study for sure, but everything on Earth would be worthy of research and "experimenting".
But the article is bullshit anyway.