This is a stupid theory because drawings are not illegal. Besides, if you knew anything about 4chan you'd be aware that people posting real cp used to be far more common and a far more plausible theory is that moot got busted for saving copies of all the cp that got posted before he deleted it and they used that to flip him.
Your citation of a statute does not change caselaw. They have tried to use to prosecute people for possessing lolicon in the US and scotus has ruled that drawings are not cp and that drawings are protected by the first amendment.
you sure about that...The first major case occurred in December 2005, when Dwight Whorley was convicted in Richmond, Virginia under 18 U.S.C. 1466A for using a Virginia Employment Commission computer to receive and distribute "obscene Japanese anime cartoons that graphically depicted prepubescent female children being forced to engage in genital-genital and oral-genital intercourse with adult males".[93][94][95] On December 18, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, consisting of 20 years' imprisonment.[96] Whorley appealed to the Supreme Court, but was denied cert.[97][98][99]
imagine they tell moot they are going to throw him in prison for 20 years if he doesn't turn it into a honey pot...
WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI ago
This is a stupid theory because drawings are not illegal. Besides, if you knew anything about 4chan you'd be aware that people posting real cp used to be far more common and a far more plausible theory is that moot got busted for saving copies of all the cp that got posted before he deleted it and they used that to flip him.
israelmossadjewgold ago
drawings considered obsecene under federal law are illegal...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A
now finding any non jew to prosecute them is another story
WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI ago
Your citation of a statute does not change caselaw. They have tried to use to prosecute people for possessing lolicon in the US and scotus has ruled that drawings are not cp and that drawings are protected by the first amendment.
israelmossadjewgold ago
sweet well lets take it to the supreme court again then now that there are less faggots in the supereme court
WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI ago
Facts don't care about your feelings nigger.
tokui ago
Problem: drawings are not illegal.
israelmossadjewgold ago
you sure about that...The first major case occurred in December 2005, when Dwight Whorley was convicted in Richmond, Virginia under 18 U.S.C. 1466A for using a Virginia Employment Commission computer to receive and distribute "obscene Japanese anime cartoons that graphically depicted prepubescent female children being forced to engage in genital-genital and oral-genital intercourse with adult males".[93][94][95] On December 18, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, consisting of 20 years' imprisonment.[96] Whorley appealed to the Supreme Court, but was denied cert.[97][98][99]
imagine they tell moot they are going to throw him in prison for 20 years if he doesn't turn it into a honey pot...
tokui ago
That might be the issue there, not drawings. Scotus ruled drawings are protected free speech.
israelmossadjewgold ago
no it's phsychological warfare on the youth of america
there are other cases not envolving a work computer. that was just the first one. you sound like a fed trying to egg on people to look at evil things.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors#United_States
tokui ago
Must be a fed!
Diggernicks ago
Seems legit
israelmossadjewgold ago
he let them make it a honey pot in exhcange for not becoming a registered sex offender and prison